Cargando…

A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers

Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baltenweck, Isabelle, Cherney, Debbie, Duncan, Alan, Eldermire, Erin, Lwoga, Edda Tandi, Labarta, Ricardo, Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu, Staal, Steven, Teufel, Nils
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w
_version_ 1783593688090279936
author Baltenweck, Isabelle
Cherney, Debbie
Duncan, Alan
Eldermire, Erin
Lwoga, Edda Tandi
Labarta, Ricardo
Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu
Staal, Steven
Teufel, Nils
author_facet Baltenweck, Isabelle
Cherney, Debbie
Duncan, Alan
Eldermire, Erin
Lwoga, Edda Tandi
Labarta, Ricardo
Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu
Staal, Steven
Teufel, Nils
author_sort Baltenweck, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towards higher productivity. This scoping review assessed the evidence for the uptake of improved ruminant livestock feed options, the effect of this uptake on livestock productivity and the degree to which this improves smallholder farmer livelihoods. In total, 22,981 papers were identified, of which 73 papers were included in the final analysis after a rigorous double-blind screening review. Only papers that reported farmers’ decision to use a new feed intervention were selected, thereby excluding feeding trials and participatory feed assessments. Of the 73 papers, only 6 reported combined evidence of adoption, effect on productivity and livelihood changes. A total of 58 papers looked at adoption, 19 at productivity change and 22 at livelihood change. This scoping review highlights the gap in evidence for the adoption of new livestock feeding practices and provides recommendations to support farmers’ uptake of feed interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7553850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75538502020-10-19 A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers Baltenweck, Isabelle Cherney, Debbie Duncan, Alan Eldermire, Erin Lwoga, Edda Tandi Labarta, Ricardo Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu Staal, Steven Teufel, Nils Nat Plants Article Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towards higher productivity. This scoping review assessed the evidence for the uptake of improved ruminant livestock feed options, the effect of this uptake on livestock productivity and the degree to which this improves smallholder farmer livelihoods. In total, 22,981 papers were identified, of which 73 papers were included in the final analysis after a rigorous double-blind screening review. Only papers that reported farmers’ decision to use a new feed intervention were selected, thereby excluding feeding trials and participatory feed assessments. Of the 73 papers, only 6 reported combined evidence of adoption, effect on productivity and livelihood changes. A total of 58 papers looked at adoption, 19 at productivity change and 22 at livelihood change. This scoping review highlights the gap in evidence for the adoption of new livestock feeding practices and provides recommendations to support farmers’ uptake of feed interventions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7553850/ /pubmed/33051615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Baltenweck, Isabelle
Cherney, Debbie
Duncan, Alan
Eldermire, Erin
Lwoga, Edda Tandi
Labarta, Ricardo
Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu
Staal, Steven
Teufel, Nils
A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
title A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
title_full A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
title_fullStr A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
title_short A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
title_sort scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w
work_keys_str_mv AT baltenweckisabelle ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT cherneydebbie ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT duncanalan ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT eldermireerin ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT lwogaeddatandi ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT labartaricardo ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT raoelizaphanjamesoburu ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT staalsteven ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT teufelnils ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT baltenweckisabelle scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT cherneydebbie scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT duncanalan scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT eldermireerin scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT lwogaeddatandi scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT labartaricardo scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT raoelizaphanjamesoburu scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT staalsteven scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers
AT teufelnils scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers