Cargando…
A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers
Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w |
_version_ | 1783593688090279936 |
---|---|
author | Baltenweck, Isabelle Cherney, Debbie Duncan, Alan Eldermire, Erin Lwoga, Edda Tandi Labarta, Ricardo Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu Staal, Steven Teufel, Nils |
author_facet | Baltenweck, Isabelle Cherney, Debbie Duncan, Alan Eldermire, Erin Lwoga, Edda Tandi Labarta, Ricardo Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu Staal, Steven Teufel, Nils |
author_sort | Baltenweck, Isabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towards higher productivity. This scoping review assessed the evidence for the uptake of improved ruminant livestock feed options, the effect of this uptake on livestock productivity and the degree to which this improves smallholder farmer livelihoods. In total, 22,981 papers were identified, of which 73 papers were included in the final analysis after a rigorous double-blind screening review. Only papers that reported farmers’ decision to use a new feed intervention were selected, thereby excluding feeding trials and participatory feed assessments. Of the 73 papers, only 6 reported combined evidence of adoption, effect on productivity and livelihood changes. A total of 58 papers looked at adoption, 19 at productivity change and 22 at livelihood change. This scoping review highlights the gap in evidence for the adoption of new livestock feeding practices and provides recommendations to support farmers’ uptake of feed interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7553850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75538502020-10-19 A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers Baltenweck, Isabelle Cherney, Debbie Duncan, Alan Eldermire, Erin Lwoga, Edda Tandi Labarta, Ricardo Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu Staal, Steven Teufel, Nils Nat Plants Article Livestock support the livelihoods of one billion people in Africa, Asia and Latin America, but the productivity of animals remains low, reducing the potential of the sector to support higher incomes and better nutrition. Improved livestock feeding has been identified as the most important step towards higher productivity. This scoping review assessed the evidence for the uptake of improved ruminant livestock feed options, the effect of this uptake on livestock productivity and the degree to which this improves smallholder farmer livelihoods. In total, 22,981 papers were identified, of which 73 papers were included in the final analysis after a rigorous double-blind screening review. Only papers that reported farmers’ decision to use a new feed intervention were selected, thereby excluding feeding trials and participatory feed assessments. Of the 73 papers, only 6 reported combined evidence of adoption, effect on productivity and livelihood changes. A total of 58 papers looked at adoption, 19 at productivity change and 22 at livelihood change. This scoping review highlights the gap in evidence for the adoption of new livestock feeding practices and provides recommendations to support farmers’ uptake of feed interventions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7553850/ /pubmed/33051615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Baltenweck, Isabelle Cherney, Debbie Duncan, Alan Eldermire, Erin Lwoga, Edda Tandi Labarta, Ricardo Rao, Elizaphan James Oburu Staal, Steven Teufel, Nils A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers |
title | A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers |
title_full | A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers |
title_short | A scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers |
title_sort | scoping review of feed interventions and livelihoods of small-scale livestock keepers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00786-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baltenweckisabelle ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT cherneydebbie ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT duncanalan ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT eldermireerin ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT lwogaeddatandi ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT labartaricardo ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT raoelizaphanjamesoburu ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT staalsteven ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT teufelnils ascopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT baltenweckisabelle scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT cherneydebbie scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT duncanalan scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT eldermireerin scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT lwogaeddatandi scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT labartaricardo scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT raoelizaphanjamesoburu scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT staalsteven scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers AT teufelnils scopingreviewoffeedinterventionsandlivelihoodsofsmallscalelivestockkeepers |