Cargando…

Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?

BACKGROUND: The detection of a low amount of viral RNA is crucial to identify a SARS-CoV-2 positive individual harboring a low level of virus, especially during the convalescent period. However, the detection of one gene at high Cycle threshold (Ct) has to be interpreted with caution. In this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falasca, Francesca, Sciandra, Ilaria, Di Carlo, Daniele, Gentile, Massimo, Deales, Alberto, Antonelli, Guido, Turriziani, Ombretta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104660
_version_ 1783593698844475392
author Falasca, Francesca
Sciandra, Ilaria
Di Carlo, Daniele
Gentile, Massimo
Deales, Alberto
Antonelli, Guido
Turriziani, Ombretta
author_facet Falasca, Francesca
Sciandra, Ilaria
Di Carlo, Daniele
Gentile, Massimo
Deales, Alberto
Antonelli, Guido
Turriziani, Ombretta
author_sort Falasca, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The detection of a low amount of viral RNA is crucial to identify a SARS-CoV-2 positive individual harboring a low level of virus, especially during the convalescent period. However, the detection of one gene at high Cycle threshold (Ct) has to be interpreted with caution. In this study we address this specific issue and report our real-life experience. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1639 nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed with Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2. Positive samples showing high Ct values (Ct>35) were concentrated by centrifugation and re-tested with Cepheid or other methods (RealStar SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR, Altona Diagnostics; GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit, Elitech). RESULTS: 1599 (97.5%) negative samples, 36 (2.3%) positive samples and 4 (0.2%) presumptive positive samples were detected. In 17 out of 36 positive patients, very low viral RNA copies were suspected since positivity was detected at high Ct. We confirmed positivity for patients who showed both E and N genes detected and for patients with only N detected but with Ct <39. On the contrary, samples with only gene N detected with Ct values >39 were found negative. NPS taken 24 hours after the first collection confirmed the negativity of the 12 samples. Clinical data sustained these results since only 2 of these 12 patients showed COVID-19-like symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These data support our consideration that detection of the N2 gene at high Ct needs to be interpreted with caution, suggesting that collaboration between virologists and clinicians is important for better understanding of results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7553900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75539002020-10-14 Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? Falasca, Francesca Sciandra, Ilaria Di Carlo, Daniele Gentile, Massimo Deales, Alberto Antonelli, Guido Turriziani, Ombretta J Clin Virol Short Communication BACKGROUND: The detection of a low amount of viral RNA is crucial to identify a SARS-CoV-2 positive individual harboring a low level of virus, especially during the convalescent period. However, the detection of one gene at high Cycle threshold (Ct) has to be interpreted with caution. In this study we address this specific issue and report our real-life experience. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1639 nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed with Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2. Positive samples showing high Ct values (Ct>35) were concentrated by centrifugation and re-tested with Cepheid or other methods (RealStar SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR, Altona Diagnostics; GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit, Elitech). RESULTS: 1599 (97.5%) negative samples, 36 (2.3%) positive samples and 4 (0.2%) presumptive positive samples were detected. In 17 out of 36 positive patients, very low viral RNA copies were suspected since positivity was detected at high Ct. We confirmed positivity for patients who showed both E and N genes detected and for patients with only N detected but with Ct <39. On the contrary, samples with only gene N detected with Ct values >39 were found negative. NPS taken 24 hours after the first collection confirmed the negativity of the 12 samples. Clinical data sustained these results since only 2 of these 12 patients showed COVID-19-like symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These data support our consideration that detection of the N2 gene at high Ct needs to be interpreted with caution, suggesting that collaboration between virologists and clinicians is important for better understanding of results. Elsevier B.V. 2020-12 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7553900/ /pubmed/33126109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104660 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Falasca, Francesca
Sciandra, Ilaria
Di Carlo, Daniele
Gentile, Massimo
Deales, Alberto
Antonelli, Guido
Turriziani, Ombretta
Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
title Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
title_full Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
title_fullStr Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
title_full_unstemmed Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
title_short Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
title_sort detection of sars-cov n2 gene: very low amounts of viral rna or false positive?
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104660
work_keys_str_mv AT falascafrancesca detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive
AT sciandrailaria detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive
AT dicarlodaniele detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive
AT gentilemassimo detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive
AT dealesalberto detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive
AT antonelliguido detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive
AT turrizianiombretta detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive