Cargando…
Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
BACKGROUND: The detection of a low amount of viral RNA is crucial to identify a SARS-CoV-2 positive individual harboring a low level of virus, especially during the convalescent period. However, the detection of one gene at high Cycle threshold (Ct) has to be interpreted with caution. In this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104660 |
_version_ | 1783593698844475392 |
---|---|
author | Falasca, Francesca Sciandra, Ilaria Di Carlo, Daniele Gentile, Massimo Deales, Alberto Antonelli, Guido Turriziani, Ombretta |
author_facet | Falasca, Francesca Sciandra, Ilaria Di Carlo, Daniele Gentile, Massimo Deales, Alberto Antonelli, Guido Turriziani, Ombretta |
author_sort | Falasca, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The detection of a low amount of viral RNA is crucial to identify a SARS-CoV-2 positive individual harboring a low level of virus, especially during the convalescent period. However, the detection of one gene at high Cycle threshold (Ct) has to be interpreted with caution. In this study we address this specific issue and report our real-life experience. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1639 nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed with Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2. Positive samples showing high Ct values (Ct>35) were concentrated by centrifugation and re-tested with Cepheid or other methods (RealStar SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR, Altona Diagnostics; GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit, Elitech). RESULTS: 1599 (97.5%) negative samples, 36 (2.3%) positive samples and 4 (0.2%) presumptive positive samples were detected. In 17 out of 36 positive patients, very low viral RNA copies were suspected since positivity was detected at high Ct. We confirmed positivity for patients who showed both E and N genes detected and for patients with only N detected but with Ct <39. On the contrary, samples with only gene N detected with Ct values >39 were found negative. NPS taken 24 hours after the first collection confirmed the negativity of the 12 samples. Clinical data sustained these results since only 2 of these 12 patients showed COVID-19-like symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These data support our consideration that detection of the N2 gene at high Ct needs to be interpreted with caution, suggesting that collaboration between virologists and clinicians is important for better understanding of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7553900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75539002020-10-14 Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? Falasca, Francesca Sciandra, Ilaria Di Carlo, Daniele Gentile, Massimo Deales, Alberto Antonelli, Guido Turriziani, Ombretta J Clin Virol Short Communication BACKGROUND: The detection of a low amount of viral RNA is crucial to identify a SARS-CoV-2 positive individual harboring a low level of virus, especially during the convalescent period. However, the detection of one gene at high Cycle threshold (Ct) has to be interpreted with caution. In this study we address this specific issue and report our real-life experience. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1639 nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) were analyzed with Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2. Positive samples showing high Ct values (Ct>35) were concentrated by centrifugation and re-tested with Cepheid or other methods (RealStar SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR, Altona Diagnostics; GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit, Elitech). RESULTS: 1599 (97.5%) negative samples, 36 (2.3%) positive samples and 4 (0.2%) presumptive positive samples were detected. In 17 out of 36 positive patients, very low viral RNA copies were suspected since positivity was detected at high Ct. We confirmed positivity for patients who showed both E and N genes detected and for patients with only N detected but with Ct <39. On the contrary, samples with only gene N detected with Ct values >39 were found negative. NPS taken 24 hours after the first collection confirmed the negativity of the 12 samples. Clinical data sustained these results since only 2 of these 12 patients showed COVID-19-like symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These data support our consideration that detection of the N2 gene at high Ct needs to be interpreted with caution, suggesting that collaboration between virologists and clinicians is important for better understanding of results. Elsevier B.V. 2020-12 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7553900/ /pubmed/33126109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104660 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Falasca, Francesca Sciandra, Ilaria Di Carlo, Daniele Gentile, Massimo Deales, Alberto Antonelli, Guido Turriziani, Ombretta Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? |
title | Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? |
title_full | Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? |
title_fullStr | Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? |
title_short | Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive? |
title_sort | detection of sars-cov n2 gene: very low amounts of viral rna or false positive? |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT falascafrancesca detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive AT sciandrailaria detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive AT dicarlodaniele detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive AT gentilemassimo detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive AT dealesalberto detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive AT antonelliguido detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive AT turrizianiombretta detectionofsarscovn2geneverylowamountsofviralrnaorfalsepositive |