Cargando…
Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects
Cycling and walking have gained a prominent role in the mobility policy agenda as awareness has risen over the growing unsustainability of the current transport system and the multiple co-benefits of active mobility. As interest and investments for cycling and walking increase, how active mobility c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553907/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.08.005 |
_version_ | 1783593700509614080 |
---|---|
author | Ruffino, Paolo Jarre, Matteo |
author_facet | Ruffino, Paolo Jarre, Matteo |
author_sort | Ruffino, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cycling and walking have gained a prominent role in the mobility policy agenda as awareness has risen over the growing unsustainability of the current transport system and the multiple co-benefits of active mobility. As interest and investments for cycling and walking increase, how active mobility can be appraised becomes a crucial question, which has been tackled over the years through different methods and tools. The aim of this chapter is to provide a structured review of the methods and the practices of appraisal of walking and cycling policies and projects, focusing on both traditional and emerging assessment techniques. At present, much attention has been paid to the application of four main traditional methods: Balance Sheet Calculations, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis. We compare and discuss these methods to identify strengths and weaknesses for each of them, as well as their main limitations and knowledge gaps in their application. We conclude that over the last decades much effort has been undertaken to further expand and develop these tools thanks to an increased attention to walking and cycling. However, much research is still needed, particularly in the quantification and valuation of specific effects within Cost-Benefit Analysis and in better integrating different appraisal techniques. Finally, the impact of appraisals on decision-making outcomes is still underexplored. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7553907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75539072020-10-14 Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects Ruffino, Paolo Jarre, Matteo Advances in Transport Policy and Planning Article Cycling and walking have gained a prominent role in the mobility policy agenda as awareness has risen over the growing unsustainability of the current transport system and the multiple co-benefits of active mobility. As interest and investments for cycling and walking increase, how active mobility can be appraised becomes a crucial question, which has been tackled over the years through different methods and tools. The aim of this chapter is to provide a structured review of the methods and the practices of appraisal of walking and cycling policies and projects, focusing on both traditional and emerging assessment techniques. At present, much attention has been paid to the application of four main traditional methods: Balance Sheet Calculations, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis. We compare and discuss these methods to identify strengths and weaknesses for each of them, as well as their main limitations and knowledge gaps in their application. We conclude that over the last decades much effort has been undertaken to further expand and develop these tools thanks to an increased attention to walking and cycling. However, much research is still needed, particularly in the quantification and valuation of specific effects within Cost-Benefit Analysis and in better integrating different appraisal techniques. Finally, the impact of appraisals on decision-making outcomes is still underexplored. Elsevier Inc. 2021 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7553907/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.08.005 Text en Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Ruffino, Paolo Jarre, Matteo Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects |
title | Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects |
title_full | Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects |
title_fullStr | Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects |
title_full_unstemmed | Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects |
title_short | Appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects |
title_sort | appraisal of cycling and pedestrian projects |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553907/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.08.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruffinopaolo appraisalofcyclingandpedestrianprojects AT jarrematteo appraisalofcyclingandpedestrianprojects |