Cargando…

Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice

The technique of catheter ablation has been improved within the past few decades, especially by three-dimensional (3D) mapping system. 3D mapping system has reduced radiation exposure but ablation procedures still require fluoroscopy. Our previous study showed the safety and efficacy of catheter abl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsubara, Takumi J., Fujiu, Katsuhito, Shimizu, Yu, Oshima, Tsukasa, Matsuda, Jun, Matsunaga, Hiroshi, Oguri, Gaku, Hasumi, Eriko, Kojima, Toshiya, Komuro, Issei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74165-y
_version_ 1783593714151587840
author Matsubara, Takumi J.
Fujiu, Katsuhito
Shimizu, Yu
Oshima, Tsukasa
Matsuda, Jun
Matsunaga, Hiroshi
Oguri, Gaku
Hasumi, Eriko
Kojima, Toshiya
Komuro, Issei
author_facet Matsubara, Takumi J.
Fujiu, Katsuhito
Shimizu, Yu
Oshima, Tsukasa
Matsuda, Jun
Matsunaga, Hiroshi
Oguri, Gaku
Hasumi, Eriko
Kojima, Toshiya
Komuro, Issei
author_sort Matsubara, Takumi J.
collection PubMed
description The technique of catheter ablation has been improved within the past few decades, especially by three-dimensional (3D) mapping system. 3D mapping system has reduced radiation exposure but ablation procedures still require fluoroscopy. Our previous study showed the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation based on intracardiac echogram combined with CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 system, however fluoroscopy use for an average of 16 min is required for this procedure. The present study was aimed to reduce radiation exposure to zero and establish a radiation free catheter ablation method with the goal of utilizing it in routine clinical practice. We conducted single center, retrospective study during 2019 April to 2020 February. Consecutive 76 patients were enrolled. In the first 18 cases, the previously reported procedure (CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 method) was used. The remaining 58 cases were transitioned to fluoroless catheter ablation. The procedure time, success rates and complication rates were analyzed. Not only AF patients but atrial flutter (AFL), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and ventricular arrhythmia patients were included. Catheter positioning, catheter visualization and collecting the geometry of each camber of the heart were conducted by using contact force and ICE based geometry on CARTO system without either prior computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance image (MRI). In fluoroless group, all catheter ablations were successfully performed without lead aprons. No complications occurred in either group. There were no significant differences in procedure time in any type of procedure (Total procedure time Fluoro-group; 149 ± 51 min vs. Fluoroless-group; 162 ± 43 min, N.S.), (PSVT 170 ± 53 min vs. 162 ± 29 min, N.S.), (AFL 110 ± 70 min vs. 123 ± 43 min, N.S.), (AF 162 ± 43 min vs. 163 ± 32 min, N.S.). The total radiation time was reduced to zero in fluoroless group. Catheter ablation with ICE and 3D mapping system guide without fluoroscopy could be safely performed with a high success rate, without any prior CT/MRI 3D images. Radiation was reduced completely for patients and staff, negating the need for protective wear for operators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7553968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75539682020-10-14 Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice Matsubara, Takumi J. Fujiu, Katsuhito Shimizu, Yu Oshima, Tsukasa Matsuda, Jun Matsunaga, Hiroshi Oguri, Gaku Hasumi, Eriko Kojima, Toshiya Komuro, Issei Sci Rep Article The technique of catheter ablation has been improved within the past few decades, especially by three-dimensional (3D) mapping system. 3D mapping system has reduced radiation exposure but ablation procedures still require fluoroscopy. Our previous study showed the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation based on intracardiac echogram combined with CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 system, however fluoroscopy use for an average of 16 min is required for this procedure. The present study was aimed to reduce radiation exposure to zero and establish a radiation free catheter ablation method with the goal of utilizing it in routine clinical practice. We conducted single center, retrospective study during 2019 April to 2020 February. Consecutive 76 patients were enrolled. In the first 18 cases, the previously reported procedure (CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 method) was used. The remaining 58 cases were transitioned to fluoroless catheter ablation. The procedure time, success rates and complication rates were analyzed. Not only AF patients but atrial flutter (AFL), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and ventricular arrhythmia patients were included. Catheter positioning, catheter visualization and collecting the geometry of each camber of the heart were conducted by using contact force and ICE based geometry on CARTO system without either prior computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance image (MRI). In fluoroless group, all catheter ablations were successfully performed without lead aprons. No complications occurred in either group. There were no significant differences in procedure time in any type of procedure (Total procedure time Fluoro-group; 149 ± 51 min vs. Fluoroless-group; 162 ± 43 min, N.S.), (PSVT 170 ± 53 min vs. 162 ± 29 min, N.S.), (AFL 110 ± 70 min vs. 123 ± 43 min, N.S.), (AF 162 ± 43 min vs. 163 ± 32 min, N.S.). The total radiation time was reduced to zero in fluoroless group. Catheter ablation with ICE and 3D mapping system guide without fluoroscopy could be safely performed with a high success rate, without any prior CT/MRI 3D images. Radiation was reduced completely for patients and staff, negating the need for protective wear for operators. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7553968/ /pubmed/33051503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74165-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Matsubara, Takumi J.
Fujiu, Katsuhito
Shimizu, Yu
Oshima, Tsukasa
Matsuda, Jun
Matsunaga, Hiroshi
Oguri, Gaku
Hasumi, Eriko
Kojima, Toshiya
Komuro, Issei
Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice
title Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice
title_full Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice
title_fullStr Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice
title_short Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice
title_sort fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7553968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74165-y
work_keys_str_mv AT matsubaratakumij fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT fujiukatsuhito fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT shimizuyu fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT oshimatsukasa fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT matsudajun fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT matsunagahiroshi fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT ogurigaku fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT hasumieriko fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT kojimatoshiya fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice
AT komuroissei fluorolessandcontrastfreecatheterablationwithoutaleadaproninroutineclinicalpractice