Cargando…

Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of thoracic aortic dimensions with non-ECG-triggered contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is accompanied with motion artefacts and requires gadolinium. To avoid both motion artefacts and gadolinium administration, we evaluated the similarity and reproducib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snel, G. J. H., Hernandez, L. M., Slart, R. H. J. A., Nguyen, C. T., Sosnovik, D. E., van Deursen, V. M., Dierckx, R. A. J. O., Velthuis, B. K., Borra, R. J. H., Prakken, N. H. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32506262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06963-x
_version_ 1783593723282587648
author Snel, G. J. H.
Hernandez, L. M.
Slart, R. H. J. A.
Nguyen, C. T.
Sosnovik, D. E.
van Deursen, V. M.
Dierckx, R. A. J. O.
Velthuis, B. K.
Borra, R. J. H.
Prakken, N. H. J.
author_facet Snel, G. J. H.
Hernandez, L. M.
Slart, R. H. J. A.
Nguyen, C. T.
Sosnovik, D. E.
van Deursen, V. M.
Dierckx, R. A. J. O.
Velthuis, B. K.
Borra, R. J. H.
Prakken, N. H. J.
author_sort Snel, G. J. H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Assessment of thoracic aortic dimensions with non-ECG-triggered contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is accompanied with motion artefacts and requires gadolinium. To avoid both motion artefacts and gadolinium administration, we evaluated the similarity and reproducibility of dimensions measured on ECG-triggered, balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRA as alternative to CE-MRA. METHODS: All patients, with varying medical conditions, referred for thoracic aortic examination between September 2016 and March 2018, who underwent non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA and SSFP-MRA (1.5 T) were retrospectively included (n = 30). Aortic dimensions were measured after double-oblique multiplanar reconstruction by two observers at nine landmarks predefined by literature guidelines. Image quality was scored at the sinus of Valsalva, mid-ascending aorta and mid-descending aorta by semi-automatically assessing the vessel sharpness. RESULTS: Aortic dimensions showed high agreement between non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA and SSFP-MRA (r = 0.99, p < 0.05) without overestimation or underestimation of aortic dimensions in SSFP-MRA (mean difference, 0.1 mm; limits of agreement, − 1.9 mm and 1.9 mm). Intra- and inter-observer variabilities were significantly smaller with SSFP-MRA for the sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction. Image quality of the sinus of Valsalva was significantly better with SSFP-MRA, as fewer images were of impaired quality (3/30) than in CE-MRA (21/30). Reproducibility of dimensions was significantly better in images scored as good quality compared to impaired quality in both sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic dimensions measured on SSFP-MRA and non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA were similar. As expected, SSFP-MRA showed better reproducibility close to the aortic root because of lesser motion artefacts, making it a feasible non-contrast imaging alternative. KEY POINTS: • SSFP-MRA provides similar dimensions as non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA. • Intra- and inter-observer reproducibilities improve for the sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction with SSFP-MRA. • ECG-triggered SSFP-MRA shows better image quality for landmarks close to the aortic root in the absence of cardiac motion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-06963-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7554008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75540082020-10-19 Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA Snel, G. J. H. Hernandez, L. M. Slart, R. H. J. A. Nguyen, C. T. Sosnovik, D. E. van Deursen, V. M. Dierckx, R. A. J. O. Velthuis, B. K. Borra, R. J. H. Prakken, N. H. J. Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: Assessment of thoracic aortic dimensions with non-ECG-triggered contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is accompanied with motion artefacts and requires gadolinium. To avoid both motion artefacts and gadolinium administration, we evaluated the similarity and reproducibility of dimensions measured on ECG-triggered, balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRA as alternative to CE-MRA. METHODS: All patients, with varying medical conditions, referred for thoracic aortic examination between September 2016 and March 2018, who underwent non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA and SSFP-MRA (1.5 T) were retrospectively included (n = 30). Aortic dimensions were measured after double-oblique multiplanar reconstruction by two observers at nine landmarks predefined by literature guidelines. Image quality was scored at the sinus of Valsalva, mid-ascending aorta and mid-descending aorta by semi-automatically assessing the vessel sharpness. RESULTS: Aortic dimensions showed high agreement between non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA and SSFP-MRA (r = 0.99, p < 0.05) without overestimation or underestimation of aortic dimensions in SSFP-MRA (mean difference, 0.1 mm; limits of agreement, − 1.9 mm and 1.9 mm). Intra- and inter-observer variabilities were significantly smaller with SSFP-MRA for the sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction. Image quality of the sinus of Valsalva was significantly better with SSFP-MRA, as fewer images were of impaired quality (3/30) than in CE-MRA (21/30). Reproducibility of dimensions was significantly better in images scored as good quality compared to impaired quality in both sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic aortic dimensions measured on SSFP-MRA and non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA were similar. As expected, SSFP-MRA showed better reproducibility close to the aortic root because of lesser motion artefacts, making it a feasible non-contrast imaging alternative. KEY POINTS: • SSFP-MRA provides similar dimensions as non-ECG-triggered CE-MRA. • Intra- and inter-observer reproducibilities improve for the sinus of Valsalva and sinotubular junction with SSFP-MRA. • ECG-triggered SSFP-MRA shows better image quality for landmarks close to the aortic root in the absence of cardiac motion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-06963-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7554008/ /pubmed/32506262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06963-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Snel, G. J. H.
Hernandez, L. M.
Slart, R. H. J. A.
Nguyen, C. T.
Sosnovik, D. E.
van Deursen, V. M.
Dierckx, R. A. J. O.
Velthuis, B. K.
Borra, R. J. H.
Prakken, N. H. J.
Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA
title Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA
title_full Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA
title_fullStr Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA
title_full_unstemmed Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA
title_short Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA
title_sort validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ecg-triggered ssfp as alternative to contrast-enhanced mra
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32506262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06963-x
work_keys_str_mv AT snelgjh validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT hernandezlm validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT slartrhja validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT nguyenct validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT sosnovikde validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT vandeursenvm validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT dierckxrajo validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT velthuisbk validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT borrarjh validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra
AT prakkennhj validationofthoracicaorticdimensionsonecgtriggeredssfpasalternativetocontrastenhancedmra