Cargando…
Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?
Prior reports have demonstrated the improved ability of delayed fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging (dual-time-point imaging) in detecting more patients with liver metastases. To evaluate whether routine triple-time-point FDG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090609 |
_version_ | 1783593874253414400 |
---|---|
author | Yen, Yu-An Huang, Wen-Sheng Chiu, Chuang-Hsin Tyan, Yu-Chang Wang, Jhi-Joung Wu, Li-Chun Feng, I Jung Lee, Chiang Hsuan |
author_facet | Yen, Yu-An Huang, Wen-Sheng Chiu, Chuang-Hsin Tyan, Yu-Chang Wang, Jhi-Joung Wu, Li-Chun Feng, I Jung Lee, Chiang Hsuan |
author_sort | Yen, Yu-An |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prior reports have demonstrated the improved ability of delayed fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging (dual-time-point imaging) in detecting more patients with liver metastases. To evaluate whether routine triple-time-point FDG PET/CT imaging improves the detection of liver metastasis not visualized on initial imaging. To our knowledge, no triple-time-point imaging has been reported. This retrospective study included total 310 patients with various malignancies who underwent PET/CT scans. Triple-time-point imaging including the liver was obtained. The comparison between negative and positive liver lesions on delayed imaging for patients with initial negative imaging were analyzed. Of the 310 patients, 286 did not exhibit liver lesions on initial imaging, but six of the 286 patients exhibited lesions on delayed imaging. No additional liver lesions were detected on further delayed imaging in the 286 patients. The other 24 patients with liver lesions identified on initial imaging still showed lesions on delayed and further delayed imaging. The analysis showed a significant difference in the percentage of colorectal cancer (66.7%) and liver lesions before the PET scan (50.0%) compared with unchanged results (22.1% and 3.9%, respectively). Routine triple-time-point imaging did not improve the detection of liver metastases; however, it may be recommended in patients with colorectal cancer and liver lesions before the PET scan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7554868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75548682020-10-14 Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? Yen, Yu-An Huang, Wen-Sheng Chiu, Chuang-Hsin Tyan, Yu-Chang Wang, Jhi-Joung Wu, Li-Chun Feng, I Jung Lee, Chiang Hsuan Diagnostics (Basel) Article Prior reports have demonstrated the improved ability of delayed fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging (dual-time-point imaging) in detecting more patients with liver metastases. To evaluate whether routine triple-time-point FDG PET/CT imaging improves the detection of liver metastasis not visualized on initial imaging. To our knowledge, no triple-time-point imaging has been reported. This retrospective study included total 310 patients with various malignancies who underwent PET/CT scans. Triple-time-point imaging including the liver was obtained. The comparison between negative and positive liver lesions on delayed imaging for patients with initial negative imaging were analyzed. Of the 310 patients, 286 did not exhibit liver lesions on initial imaging, but six of the 286 patients exhibited lesions on delayed imaging. No additional liver lesions were detected on further delayed imaging in the 286 patients. The other 24 patients with liver lesions identified on initial imaging still showed lesions on delayed and further delayed imaging. The analysis showed a significant difference in the percentage of colorectal cancer (66.7%) and liver lesions before the PET scan (50.0%) compared with unchanged results (22.1% and 3.9%, respectively). Routine triple-time-point imaging did not improve the detection of liver metastases; however, it may be recommended in patients with colorectal cancer and liver lesions before the PET scan. MDPI 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7554868/ /pubmed/32825064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090609 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yen, Yu-An Huang, Wen-Sheng Chiu, Chuang-Hsin Tyan, Yu-Chang Wang, Jhi-Joung Wu, Li-Chun Feng, I Jung Lee, Chiang Hsuan Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? |
title | Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? |
title_full | Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? |
title_fullStr | Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? |
title_short | Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? |
title_sort | does routine triple-time-point fdg pet/ct imaging improve the detection of liver metastases? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yenyuan doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases AT huangwensheng doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases AT chiuchuanghsin doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases AT tyanyuchang doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases AT wangjhijoung doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases AT wulichun doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases AT fengijung doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases AT leechianghsuan doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases |