Cargando…

Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?

Prior reports have demonstrated the improved ability of delayed fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging (dual-time-point imaging) in detecting more patients with liver metastases. To evaluate whether routine triple-time-point FDG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yen, Yu-An, Huang, Wen-Sheng, Chiu, Chuang-Hsin, Tyan, Yu-Chang, Wang, Jhi-Joung, Wu, Li-Chun, Feng, I Jung, Lee, Chiang Hsuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090609
_version_ 1783593874253414400
author Yen, Yu-An
Huang, Wen-Sheng
Chiu, Chuang-Hsin
Tyan, Yu-Chang
Wang, Jhi-Joung
Wu, Li-Chun
Feng, I Jung
Lee, Chiang Hsuan
author_facet Yen, Yu-An
Huang, Wen-Sheng
Chiu, Chuang-Hsin
Tyan, Yu-Chang
Wang, Jhi-Joung
Wu, Li-Chun
Feng, I Jung
Lee, Chiang Hsuan
author_sort Yen, Yu-An
collection PubMed
description Prior reports have demonstrated the improved ability of delayed fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging (dual-time-point imaging) in detecting more patients with liver metastases. To evaluate whether routine triple-time-point FDG PET/CT imaging improves the detection of liver metastasis not visualized on initial imaging. To our knowledge, no triple-time-point imaging has been reported. This retrospective study included total 310 patients with various malignancies who underwent PET/CT scans. Triple-time-point imaging including the liver was obtained. The comparison between negative and positive liver lesions on delayed imaging for patients with initial negative imaging were analyzed. Of the 310 patients, 286 did not exhibit liver lesions on initial imaging, but six of the 286 patients exhibited lesions on delayed imaging. No additional liver lesions were detected on further delayed imaging in the 286 patients. The other 24 patients with liver lesions identified on initial imaging still showed lesions on delayed and further delayed imaging. The analysis showed a significant difference in the percentage of colorectal cancer (66.7%) and liver lesions before the PET scan (50.0%) compared with unchanged results (22.1% and 3.9%, respectively). Routine triple-time-point imaging did not improve the detection of liver metastases; however, it may be recommended in patients with colorectal cancer and liver lesions before the PET scan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7554868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75548682020-10-14 Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases? Yen, Yu-An Huang, Wen-Sheng Chiu, Chuang-Hsin Tyan, Yu-Chang Wang, Jhi-Joung Wu, Li-Chun Feng, I Jung Lee, Chiang Hsuan Diagnostics (Basel) Article Prior reports have demonstrated the improved ability of delayed fluorine-18 ((18)F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging (dual-time-point imaging) in detecting more patients with liver metastases. To evaluate whether routine triple-time-point FDG PET/CT imaging improves the detection of liver metastasis not visualized on initial imaging. To our knowledge, no triple-time-point imaging has been reported. This retrospective study included total 310 patients with various malignancies who underwent PET/CT scans. Triple-time-point imaging including the liver was obtained. The comparison between negative and positive liver lesions on delayed imaging for patients with initial negative imaging were analyzed. Of the 310 patients, 286 did not exhibit liver lesions on initial imaging, but six of the 286 patients exhibited lesions on delayed imaging. No additional liver lesions were detected on further delayed imaging in the 286 patients. The other 24 patients with liver lesions identified on initial imaging still showed lesions on delayed and further delayed imaging. The analysis showed a significant difference in the percentage of colorectal cancer (66.7%) and liver lesions before the PET scan (50.0%) compared with unchanged results (22.1% and 3.9%, respectively). Routine triple-time-point imaging did not improve the detection of liver metastases; however, it may be recommended in patients with colorectal cancer and liver lesions before the PET scan. MDPI 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7554868/ /pubmed/32825064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090609 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yen, Yu-An
Huang, Wen-Sheng
Chiu, Chuang-Hsin
Tyan, Yu-Chang
Wang, Jhi-Joung
Wu, Li-Chun
Feng, I Jung
Lee, Chiang Hsuan
Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?
title Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?
title_full Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?
title_fullStr Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?
title_full_unstemmed Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?
title_short Does Routine Triple-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Improve the Detection of Liver Metastases?
title_sort does routine triple-time-point fdg pet/ct imaging improve the detection of liver metastases?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090609
work_keys_str_mv AT yenyuan doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases
AT huangwensheng doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases
AT chiuchuanghsin doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases
AT tyanyuchang doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases
AT wangjhijoung doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases
AT wulichun doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases
AT fengijung doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases
AT leechianghsuan doesroutinetripletimepointfdgpetctimagingimprovethedetectionoflivermetastases