Cargando…
Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products
African swine fever (ASF) is a highly lethal disease of pigs caused by the ASF virus (ASFV), which presents a serious threat to global food security. The movement of contaminated pork products has previously been postulated as contributing to the introduction of ASF into new areas. To evaluate the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091148 |
_version_ | 1783593877299527680 |
---|---|
author | Flannery, John Moore, Rebecca Marsella, Laura Harris, Katie Ashby, Martin Rajko-Nenow, Paulina Roberts, Helen Gubbins, Simon Batten, Carrie |
author_facet | Flannery, John Moore, Rebecca Marsella, Laura Harris, Katie Ashby, Martin Rajko-Nenow, Paulina Roberts, Helen Gubbins, Simon Batten, Carrie |
author_sort | Flannery, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | African swine fever (ASF) is a highly lethal disease of pigs caused by the ASF virus (ASFV), which presents a serious threat to global food security. The movement of contaminated pork products has previously been postulated as contributing to the introduction of ASF into new areas. To evaluate the performance of ASFV detection systems in multi-component pork products, we spiked sausage meat with four different ASFV-containing materials (ASFV cell culture, pork loin, meat juice and bone marrow). DNA was extracted using two manual systems (MagMAX CORE, Qiagen) and one automated (MagMAX CORE) one, and three qPCR assays (VetMAX, King, UPL) were used. The performance of the DNA extraction systems was as follows; automated MagMAX > manual MagMAX > manual Qiagen. The commercial VetMAX qPCR assay yielded significantly lower C(T) values (p < 0.001), showing greater sensitivity than the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)-prescribed assays (King, UPL). Detection probability was the highest for matrices contaminated with bone marrow compared with pork loin or meat juice. An estimated minimum sample size of one 1-g sample is sufficient to detect ASFV in a homogenous pork product if bone marrow from infected pigs comprises 1 part in 10,000. We demonstrated that existing ASFV detection systems are appropriate for use in a food-testing capacity, which can provide an additional control measure for ASF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7554881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75548812020-10-14 Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products Flannery, John Moore, Rebecca Marsella, Laura Harris, Katie Ashby, Martin Rajko-Nenow, Paulina Roberts, Helen Gubbins, Simon Batten, Carrie Foods Article African swine fever (ASF) is a highly lethal disease of pigs caused by the ASF virus (ASFV), which presents a serious threat to global food security. The movement of contaminated pork products has previously been postulated as contributing to the introduction of ASF into new areas. To evaluate the performance of ASFV detection systems in multi-component pork products, we spiked sausage meat with four different ASFV-containing materials (ASFV cell culture, pork loin, meat juice and bone marrow). DNA was extracted using two manual systems (MagMAX CORE, Qiagen) and one automated (MagMAX CORE) one, and three qPCR assays (VetMAX, King, UPL) were used. The performance of the DNA extraction systems was as follows; automated MagMAX > manual MagMAX > manual Qiagen. The commercial VetMAX qPCR assay yielded significantly lower C(T) values (p < 0.001), showing greater sensitivity than the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)-prescribed assays (King, UPL). Detection probability was the highest for matrices contaminated with bone marrow compared with pork loin or meat juice. An estimated minimum sample size of one 1-g sample is sufficient to detect ASFV in a homogenous pork product if bone marrow from infected pigs comprises 1 part in 10,000. We demonstrated that existing ASFV detection systems are appropriate for use in a food-testing capacity, which can provide an additional control measure for ASF. MDPI 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7554881/ /pubmed/32825271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091148 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Flannery, John Moore, Rebecca Marsella, Laura Harris, Katie Ashby, Martin Rajko-Nenow, Paulina Roberts, Helen Gubbins, Simon Batten, Carrie Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products |
title | Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products |
title_full | Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products |
title_fullStr | Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products |
title_short | Towards a Sampling Rationale for African Swine Fever Virus Detection in Pork Products |
title_sort | towards a sampling rationale for african swine fever virus detection in pork products |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7554881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flanneryjohn towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT moorerebecca towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT marsellalaura towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT harriskatie towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT ashbymartin towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT rajkonenowpaulina towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT robertshelen towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT gubbinssimon towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts AT battencarrie towardsasamplingrationaleforafricanswinefevervirusdetectioninporkproducts |