Cargando…
Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study
OBJECTIVE: Long-term extension (LTE) studies of belimumab in SLE do not include a comparator arm, preventing comparisons between belimumab plus standard therapy and standard therapy alone for organ damage accrual. Propensity score matching can be used to match belimumab-treated patients from LTE stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000412 |
_version_ | 1783593929710501888 |
---|---|
author | Urowitz, Murray B Ohsfeldt, Robert L Wielage, Ronald C Dever, John J Zakerifar, Mehdi Asukai, Yumi Ramachandran, Sulabha Joshi, Ashish V |
author_facet | Urowitz, Murray B Ohsfeldt, Robert L Wielage, Ronald C Dever, John J Zakerifar, Mehdi Asukai, Yumi Ramachandran, Sulabha Joshi, Ashish V |
author_sort | Urowitz, Murray B |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Long-term extension (LTE) studies of belimumab in SLE do not include a comparator arm, preventing comparisons between belimumab plus standard therapy and standard therapy alone for organ damage accrual. Propensity score matching can be used to match belimumab-treated patients from LTE studies with standard therapy–treated patients from observational cohort studies. This analysis was designed to compare organ damage progression between treatment groups (belimumab plus standard therapy vs standard therapy alone) in patients with SLE with ≥5 years of follow-up, reproducing our previous study with more generalisable data. METHODS: This exploratory post hoc analysis used a heterogeneous population of US and non-US patients receiving monthly intravenous belimumab from pooled BLISS LTE trials (BEL112234/NCT00712933) and standard therapy–treated patients from the Toronto Lupus Cohort. Sixteen clinical variables were selected to calculate the propensity score. RESULTS: The 592 LTE and 381 Toronto Lupus Cohort patients were highly dissimilar across the 16 variables; an adequately balanced sample of 181 LTE and 181 matched Toronto Lupus Cohort patients (mean bias=3.7%) was created using propensity score matching. Belimumab treatment was associated with a smaller increase in Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) over 5 years than standard therapy alone (mean treatment difference=–0.453 (95% CI –0.646 to –0.260); p<0.001). Patients treated with belimumab were 60% less likely to progress to a higher SDI score over any given year of follow-up, compared with standard therapy alone (HR (95% CI) 0.397 (0.275 to 0.572); p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using propensity score matching, this highly heterogeneous sample was sufficiently matched to the Toronto Lupus Cohort, suggesting that patients treated with intravenous belimumab may have reduced organ damage progression versus standard therapy alone. This analysis of a large and diverse pooled SLE population was consistent with our previously published US-focused study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7555104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75551042020-10-22 Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study Urowitz, Murray B Ohsfeldt, Robert L Wielage, Ronald C Dever, John J Zakerifar, Mehdi Asukai, Yumi Ramachandran, Sulabha Joshi, Ashish V Lupus Sci Med Brief Communication OBJECTIVE: Long-term extension (LTE) studies of belimumab in SLE do not include a comparator arm, preventing comparisons between belimumab plus standard therapy and standard therapy alone for organ damage accrual. Propensity score matching can be used to match belimumab-treated patients from LTE studies with standard therapy–treated patients from observational cohort studies. This analysis was designed to compare organ damage progression between treatment groups (belimumab plus standard therapy vs standard therapy alone) in patients with SLE with ≥5 years of follow-up, reproducing our previous study with more generalisable data. METHODS: This exploratory post hoc analysis used a heterogeneous population of US and non-US patients receiving monthly intravenous belimumab from pooled BLISS LTE trials (BEL112234/NCT00712933) and standard therapy–treated patients from the Toronto Lupus Cohort. Sixteen clinical variables were selected to calculate the propensity score. RESULTS: The 592 LTE and 381 Toronto Lupus Cohort patients were highly dissimilar across the 16 variables; an adequately balanced sample of 181 LTE and 181 matched Toronto Lupus Cohort patients (mean bias=3.7%) was created using propensity score matching. Belimumab treatment was associated with a smaller increase in Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) over 5 years than standard therapy alone (mean treatment difference=–0.453 (95% CI –0.646 to –0.260); p<0.001). Patients treated with belimumab were 60% less likely to progress to a higher SDI score over any given year of follow-up, compared with standard therapy alone (HR (95% CI) 0.397 (0.275 to 0.572); p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using propensity score matching, this highly heterogeneous sample was sufficiently matched to the Toronto Lupus Cohort, suggesting that patients treated with intravenous belimumab may have reduced organ damage progression versus standard therapy alone. This analysis of a large and diverse pooled SLE population was consistent with our previously published US-focused study. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7555104/ /pubmed/33051264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000412 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Urowitz, Murray B Ohsfeldt, Robert L Wielage, Ronald C Dever, John J Zakerifar, Mehdi Asukai, Yumi Ramachandran, Sulabha Joshi, Ashish V Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study |
title | Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study |
title_full | Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study |
title_short | Comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study |
title_sort | comparative analysis of long-term organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using belimumab versus standard therapy: a post hoc longitudinal study |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT urowitzmurrayb comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy AT ohsfeldtrobertl comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy AT wielageronaldc comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy AT deverjohnj comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy AT zakerifarmehdi comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy AT asukaiyumi comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy AT ramachandransulabha comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy AT joshiashishv comparativeanalysisoflongtermorgandamageinpatientswithsystemiclupuserythematosususingbelimumabversusstandardtherapyaposthoclongitudinalstudy |