Cargando…

Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing

Sepsis represents a serious medical problem accounting for numerous deaths of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). An early, sensitive, and specific diagnosis is considered a key element for improving the outcome of sepsis patients. In addition to classical laboratory markers, ICU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Link, Fabian, Krohn, Knut, Burgdorff, Anna-Maria, Christel, Annett, Schumann, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090701
_version_ 1783593931594792960
author Link, Fabian
Krohn, Knut
Burgdorff, Anna-Maria
Christel, Annett
Schumann, Julia
author_facet Link, Fabian
Krohn, Knut
Burgdorff, Anna-Maria
Christel, Annett
Schumann, Julia
author_sort Link, Fabian
collection PubMed
description Sepsis represents a serious medical problem accounting for numerous deaths of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). An early, sensitive, and specific diagnosis is considered a key element for improving the outcome of sepsis patients. In addition to classical laboratory markers, ICU scoring systems and serum miRNAs are discussed as potential sepsis biomarkers. In the present prospective observational study, the suitability of miRNAs in sepsis diagnosis was tested based on proper validated and normalized data (i.e., absolute quantification by means of Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)) in direct comparison to classical sepsis markers and ICU scores within the same patient cohort. Therefore, blood samples of septic intensive care patients (n = 12) taken at day of admission at ICU were compared to non-septic intensive care patients (n = 12) and a healthy control group (n = 12). Our analysis indicates that all tested biomarkers have only a moderate informative power and do not allow an unequivocal differentiation between septic and non-septic ICU patients. In conclusion, there is no standalone laboratory parameter that enables a reliable diagnosis of sepsis. miRNAs are not superior to classical parameters in this respect. It seems recommendable to measure multiple parameters and scores and to interpret them with regard to the clinical presentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7555112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75551122020-10-14 Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing Link, Fabian Krohn, Knut Burgdorff, Anna-Maria Christel, Annett Schumann, Julia Diagnostics (Basel) Article Sepsis represents a serious medical problem accounting for numerous deaths of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). An early, sensitive, and specific diagnosis is considered a key element for improving the outcome of sepsis patients. In addition to classical laboratory markers, ICU scoring systems and serum miRNAs are discussed as potential sepsis biomarkers. In the present prospective observational study, the suitability of miRNAs in sepsis diagnosis was tested based on proper validated and normalized data (i.e., absolute quantification by means of Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)) in direct comparison to classical sepsis markers and ICU scores within the same patient cohort. Therefore, blood samples of septic intensive care patients (n = 12) taken at day of admission at ICU were compared to non-septic intensive care patients (n = 12) and a healthy control group (n = 12). Our analysis indicates that all tested biomarkers have only a moderate informative power and do not allow an unequivocal differentiation between septic and non-septic ICU patients. In conclusion, there is no standalone laboratory parameter that enables a reliable diagnosis of sepsis. miRNAs are not superior to classical parameters in this respect. It seems recommendable to measure multiple parameters and scores and to interpret them with regard to the clinical presentation. MDPI 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7555112/ /pubmed/32948040 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090701 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Link, Fabian
Krohn, Knut
Burgdorff, Anna-Maria
Christel, Annett
Schumann, Julia
Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing
title Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing
title_full Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing
title_fullStr Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing
title_full_unstemmed Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing
title_short Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing
title_sort sepsis diagnostics: intensive care scoring systems superior to microrna biomarker testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090701
work_keys_str_mv AT linkfabian sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting
AT krohnknut sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting
AT burgdorffannamaria sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting
AT christelannett sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting
AT schumannjulia sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting