Cargando…
Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing
Sepsis represents a serious medical problem accounting for numerous deaths of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). An early, sensitive, and specific diagnosis is considered a key element for improving the outcome of sepsis patients. In addition to classical laboratory markers, ICU...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948040 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090701 |
_version_ | 1783593931594792960 |
---|---|
author | Link, Fabian Krohn, Knut Burgdorff, Anna-Maria Christel, Annett Schumann, Julia |
author_facet | Link, Fabian Krohn, Knut Burgdorff, Anna-Maria Christel, Annett Schumann, Julia |
author_sort | Link, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sepsis represents a serious medical problem accounting for numerous deaths of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). An early, sensitive, and specific diagnosis is considered a key element for improving the outcome of sepsis patients. In addition to classical laboratory markers, ICU scoring systems and serum miRNAs are discussed as potential sepsis biomarkers. In the present prospective observational study, the suitability of miRNAs in sepsis diagnosis was tested based on proper validated and normalized data (i.e., absolute quantification by means of Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)) in direct comparison to classical sepsis markers and ICU scores within the same patient cohort. Therefore, blood samples of septic intensive care patients (n = 12) taken at day of admission at ICU were compared to non-septic intensive care patients (n = 12) and a healthy control group (n = 12). Our analysis indicates that all tested biomarkers have only a moderate informative power and do not allow an unequivocal differentiation between septic and non-septic ICU patients. In conclusion, there is no standalone laboratory parameter that enables a reliable diagnosis of sepsis. miRNAs are not superior to classical parameters in this respect. It seems recommendable to measure multiple parameters and scores and to interpret them with regard to the clinical presentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7555112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75551122020-10-14 Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing Link, Fabian Krohn, Knut Burgdorff, Anna-Maria Christel, Annett Schumann, Julia Diagnostics (Basel) Article Sepsis represents a serious medical problem accounting for numerous deaths of critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). An early, sensitive, and specific diagnosis is considered a key element for improving the outcome of sepsis patients. In addition to classical laboratory markers, ICU scoring systems and serum miRNAs are discussed as potential sepsis biomarkers. In the present prospective observational study, the suitability of miRNAs in sepsis diagnosis was tested based on proper validated and normalized data (i.e., absolute quantification by means of Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR)) in direct comparison to classical sepsis markers and ICU scores within the same patient cohort. Therefore, blood samples of septic intensive care patients (n = 12) taken at day of admission at ICU were compared to non-septic intensive care patients (n = 12) and a healthy control group (n = 12). Our analysis indicates that all tested biomarkers have only a moderate informative power and do not allow an unequivocal differentiation between septic and non-septic ICU patients. In conclusion, there is no standalone laboratory parameter that enables a reliable diagnosis of sepsis. miRNAs are not superior to classical parameters in this respect. It seems recommendable to measure multiple parameters and scores and to interpret them with regard to the clinical presentation. MDPI 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7555112/ /pubmed/32948040 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090701 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Link, Fabian Krohn, Knut Burgdorff, Anna-Maria Christel, Annett Schumann, Julia Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing |
title | Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing |
title_full | Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing |
title_fullStr | Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing |
title_short | Sepsis Diagnostics: Intensive Care Scoring Systems Superior to MicroRNA Biomarker Testing |
title_sort | sepsis diagnostics: intensive care scoring systems superior to microrna biomarker testing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948040 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linkfabian sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting AT krohnknut sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting AT burgdorffannamaria sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting AT christelannett sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting AT schumannjulia sepsisdiagnosticsintensivecarescoringsystemssuperiortomicrornabiomarkertesting |