Cargando…

A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI

Computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems have the potential to improve robustness and efficiency compared to traditional radiological reading of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fully automated segmentation of the prostate is a crucial step of CAD for prostate cancer, but visual inspect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sunoqrot, Mohammed R. S., Selnæs, Kirsten M., Sandsmark, Elise, Nketiah, Gabriel A., Zavala-Romero, Olmo, Stoyanova, Radka, Bathen, Tone F., Elschot, Mattijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090714
_version_ 1783594004957364224
author Sunoqrot, Mohammed R. S.
Selnæs, Kirsten M.
Sandsmark, Elise
Nketiah, Gabriel A.
Zavala-Romero, Olmo
Stoyanova, Radka
Bathen, Tone F.
Elschot, Mattijs
author_facet Sunoqrot, Mohammed R. S.
Selnæs, Kirsten M.
Sandsmark, Elise
Nketiah, Gabriel A.
Zavala-Romero, Olmo
Stoyanova, Radka
Bathen, Tone F.
Elschot, Mattijs
author_sort Sunoqrot, Mohammed R. S.
collection PubMed
description Computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems have the potential to improve robustness and efficiency compared to traditional radiological reading of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fully automated segmentation of the prostate is a crucial step of CAD for prostate cancer, but visual inspection is still required to detect poorly segmented cases. The aim of this work was therefore to establish a fully automated quality control (QC) system for prostate segmentation based on T2-weighted MRI. Four different deep learning-based segmentation methods were used to segment the prostate for 585 patients. First order, shape and textural radiomics features were extracted from the segmented prostate masks. A reference quality score (QS) was calculated for each automated segmentation in comparison to a manual segmentation. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was trained and optimized on a randomly assigned training dataset (N = 1756, 439 cases from each segmentation method) to build a generalizable linear regression model based on the radiomics features that best estimated the reference QS. Subsequently, the model was used to estimate the QSs for an independent testing dataset (N = 584, 146 cases from each segmentation method). The mean ± standard deviation absolute error between the estimated and reference QSs was 5.47 ± 6.33 on a scale from 0 to 100. In addition, we found a strong correlation between the estimated and reference QSs (rho = 0.70). In conclusion, we developed an automated QC system that may be helpful for evaluating the quality of automated prostate segmentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7555425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75554252020-10-19 A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI Sunoqrot, Mohammed R. S. Selnæs, Kirsten M. Sandsmark, Elise Nketiah, Gabriel A. Zavala-Romero, Olmo Stoyanova, Radka Bathen, Tone F. Elschot, Mattijs Diagnostics (Basel) Article Computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems have the potential to improve robustness and efficiency compared to traditional radiological reading of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fully automated segmentation of the prostate is a crucial step of CAD for prostate cancer, but visual inspection is still required to detect poorly segmented cases. The aim of this work was therefore to establish a fully automated quality control (QC) system for prostate segmentation based on T2-weighted MRI. Four different deep learning-based segmentation methods were used to segment the prostate for 585 patients. First order, shape and textural radiomics features were extracted from the segmented prostate masks. A reference quality score (QS) was calculated for each automated segmentation in comparison to a manual segmentation. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was trained and optimized on a randomly assigned training dataset (N = 1756, 439 cases from each segmentation method) to build a generalizable linear regression model based on the radiomics features that best estimated the reference QS. Subsequently, the model was used to estimate the QSs for an independent testing dataset (N = 584, 146 cases from each segmentation method). The mean ± standard deviation absolute error between the estimated and reference QSs was 5.47 ± 6.33 on a scale from 0 to 100. In addition, we found a strong correlation between the estimated and reference QSs (rho = 0.70). In conclusion, we developed an automated QC system that may be helpful for evaluating the quality of automated prostate segmentations. MDPI 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7555425/ /pubmed/32961895 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090714 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sunoqrot, Mohammed R. S.
Selnæs, Kirsten M.
Sandsmark, Elise
Nketiah, Gabriel A.
Zavala-Romero, Olmo
Stoyanova, Radka
Bathen, Tone F.
Elschot, Mattijs
A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI
title A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI
title_full A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI
title_fullStr A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI
title_full_unstemmed A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI
title_short A Quality Control System for Automated Prostate Segmentation on T2-Weighted MRI
title_sort quality control system for automated prostate segmentation on t2-weighted mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961895
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090714
work_keys_str_mv AT sunoqrotmohammedrs aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT selnæskirstenm aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT sandsmarkelise aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT nketiahgabriela aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT zavalaromeroolmo aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT stoyanovaradka aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT bathentonef aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT elschotmattijs aqualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT sunoqrotmohammedrs qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT selnæskirstenm qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT sandsmarkelise qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT nketiahgabriela qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT zavalaromeroolmo qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT stoyanovaradka qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT bathentonef qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri
AT elschotmattijs qualitycontrolsystemforautomatedprostatesegmentationont2weightedmri