Cargando…

The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew

Molecular changes associated with response to powdery mildew (PM) caused by Erysiphe necator have been largely explored in Vitis vinifera cultivars, but little is known on transcriptional and metabolic modifications following application of resistance elicitors against this disease. In this study, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pagliarani, Chiara, Moine, Amedeo, Chitarra, Walter, Meloni, Giovanna Roberta, Abbà, Simona, Nerva, Luca, Pugliese, Massimo, Gullino, Maria Lodovica, Gambino, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186776
_version_ 1783594071097344000
author Pagliarani, Chiara
Moine, Amedeo
Chitarra, Walter
Meloni, Giovanna Roberta
Abbà, Simona
Nerva, Luca
Pugliese, Massimo
Gullino, Maria Lodovica
Gambino, Giorgio
author_facet Pagliarani, Chiara
Moine, Amedeo
Chitarra, Walter
Meloni, Giovanna Roberta
Abbà, Simona
Nerva, Luca
Pugliese, Massimo
Gullino, Maria Lodovica
Gambino, Giorgio
author_sort Pagliarani, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Molecular changes associated with response to powdery mildew (PM) caused by Erysiphe necator have been largely explored in Vitis vinifera cultivars, but little is known on transcriptional and metabolic modifications following application of resistance elicitors against this disease. In this study, the whole transcriptome sequencing, and hormone and metabolite analyses were combined to dissect long-term defense mechanisms induced by molecular reprogramming events in PM-infected ‘Moscato’ and ‘Nebbiolo’ leaves treated with three resistance inducers: acibenzolar-S-methyl, potassium phosphonate, and laminarin. Although all compounds were effective in counteracting the disease, acibenzolar-S-methyl caused the most intense transcriptional modifications in both cultivars. These involved a strong down-regulation of photosynthesis and energy metabolism and changes in carbohydrate accumulation and partitioning that most likely shifted the plant growth-defense trade-off towards the establishment of disease resistance processes. It was also shown that genotype-associated metabolic signals significantly affected the cultivar defense machinery. Indeed, ‘Nebbiolo’ and ‘Moscato’ built up different defense strategies, often enhanced by the application of a specific elicitor, which resulted in either reinforcement of early defense mechanisms (e.g., epicuticular wax deposition and overexpression of pathogenesis-related genes in ‘Nebbiolo’), or accumulation of endogenous hormones and antimicrobial compounds (e.g., high content of abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, and viniferin in ‘Moscato’).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7555711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75557112020-10-19 The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew Pagliarani, Chiara Moine, Amedeo Chitarra, Walter Meloni, Giovanna Roberta Abbà, Simona Nerva, Luca Pugliese, Massimo Gullino, Maria Lodovica Gambino, Giorgio Int J Mol Sci Article Molecular changes associated with response to powdery mildew (PM) caused by Erysiphe necator have been largely explored in Vitis vinifera cultivars, but little is known on transcriptional and metabolic modifications following application of resistance elicitors against this disease. In this study, the whole transcriptome sequencing, and hormone and metabolite analyses were combined to dissect long-term defense mechanisms induced by molecular reprogramming events in PM-infected ‘Moscato’ and ‘Nebbiolo’ leaves treated with three resistance inducers: acibenzolar-S-methyl, potassium phosphonate, and laminarin. Although all compounds were effective in counteracting the disease, acibenzolar-S-methyl caused the most intense transcriptional modifications in both cultivars. These involved a strong down-regulation of photosynthesis and energy metabolism and changes in carbohydrate accumulation and partitioning that most likely shifted the plant growth-defense trade-off towards the establishment of disease resistance processes. It was also shown that genotype-associated metabolic signals significantly affected the cultivar defense machinery. Indeed, ‘Nebbiolo’ and ‘Moscato’ built up different defense strategies, often enhanced by the application of a specific elicitor, which resulted in either reinforcement of early defense mechanisms (e.g., epicuticular wax deposition and overexpression of pathogenesis-related genes in ‘Nebbiolo’), or accumulation of endogenous hormones and antimicrobial compounds (e.g., high content of abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, and viniferin in ‘Moscato’). MDPI 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7555711/ /pubmed/32942781 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186776 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pagliarani, Chiara
Moine, Amedeo
Chitarra, Walter
Meloni, Giovanna Roberta
Abbà, Simona
Nerva, Luca
Pugliese, Massimo
Gullino, Maria Lodovica
Gambino, Giorgio
The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew
title The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew
title_full The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew
title_fullStr The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew
title_full_unstemmed The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew
title_short The Molecular Priming of Defense Responses is Differently Regulated in Grapevine Genotypes Following Elicitor Application against Powdery Mildew
title_sort molecular priming of defense responses is differently regulated in grapevine genotypes following elicitor application against powdery mildew
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186776
work_keys_str_mv AT pagliaranichiara themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT moineamedeo themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT chitarrawalter themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT melonigiovannaroberta themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT abbasimona themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT nervaluca themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT pugliesemassimo themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT gullinomarialodovica themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT gambinogiorgio themolecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT pagliaranichiara molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT moineamedeo molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT chitarrawalter molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT melonigiovannaroberta molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT abbasimona molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT nervaluca molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT pugliesemassimo molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT gullinomarialodovica molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew
AT gambinogiorgio molecularprimingofdefenseresponsesisdifferentlyregulatedingrapevinegenotypesfollowingelicitorapplicationagainstpowderymildew