Cargando…
Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case
Due to its multiple advantages, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is being considered as a complementary technique to mass spectrometry (MS). The goal of this work is to investigate and compare the capacity of IMS and MS in the classification of olive oil according to its quality. For this purpose, tw...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091288 |
_version_ | 1783594133704671232 |
---|---|
author | García-Nicolás, María Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia Arce, Lourdes Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel Viñas, Pilar |
author_facet | García-Nicolás, María Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia Arce, Lourdes Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel Viñas, Pilar |
author_sort | García-Nicolás, María |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to its multiple advantages, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is being considered as a complementary technique to mass spectrometry (MS). The goal of this work is to investigate and compare the capacity of IMS and MS in the classification of olive oil according to its quality. For this purpose, two analytical methods based on headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) coupled with MS or with IMS have been optimized and characterized for the determination of volatile organic compounds from olive oil samples. Both detectors were compared in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, demonstrating that complementary data were obtained and both detectors have proven to be complementary. MS and IMS showed similar selectivity (10 out of 38 compounds were detected by HS-GC-IMS, whereas twelve compounds were detected by HS-GC-MS). However, IMS presented slightly better sensitivity (Limits of quantification (LOQ) ranged between 0.08 and 0.8 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-IMS, and between 0.2 and 2.1 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-MS). Finally, the potential of both detectors coupled with HS-GC for classification of olive oil samples depending on its quality was investigated. In this case, similar results were obtained when using both HS-GC-MS and HS-GC-IMS equipment (85.71 % of samples of the external validation set were classified correctly (validation rate)) and, although both techniques were shown to be complementary, data fusion did not improve validation results (80.95% validation rate). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7555980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75559802020-10-19 Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case García-Nicolás, María Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia Arce, Lourdes Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel Viñas, Pilar Foods Article Due to its multiple advantages, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is being considered as a complementary technique to mass spectrometry (MS). The goal of this work is to investigate and compare the capacity of IMS and MS in the classification of olive oil according to its quality. For this purpose, two analytical methods based on headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) coupled with MS or with IMS have been optimized and characterized for the determination of volatile organic compounds from olive oil samples. Both detectors were compared in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, demonstrating that complementary data were obtained and both detectors have proven to be complementary. MS and IMS showed similar selectivity (10 out of 38 compounds were detected by HS-GC-IMS, whereas twelve compounds were detected by HS-GC-MS). However, IMS presented slightly better sensitivity (Limits of quantification (LOQ) ranged between 0.08 and 0.8 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-IMS, and between 0.2 and 2.1 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-MS). Finally, the potential of both detectors coupled with HS-GC for classification of olive oil samples depending on its quality was investigated. In this case, similar results were obtained when using both HS-GC-MS and HS-GC-IMS equipment (85.71 % of samples of the external validation set were classified correctly (validation rate)) and, although both techniques were shown to be complementary, data fusion did not improve validation results (80.95% validation rate). MDPI 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7555980/ /pubmed/32937810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091288 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article García-Nicolás, María Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia Arce, Lourdes Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel Viñas, Pilar Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case |
title | Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case |
title_full | Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case |
title_fullStr | Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case |
title_full_unstemmed | Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case |
title_short | Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case |
title_sort | headspace gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry: classification of virgin olive oils as a study case |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garcianicolasmaria headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase AT arroyomanzanaresnatalia headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase AT arcelourdes headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase AT hernandezcordobamanuel headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase AT vinaspilar headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase |