Cargando…

Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case

Due to its multiple advantages, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is being considered as a complementary technique to mass spectrometry (MS). The goal of this work is to investigate and compare the capacity of IMS and MS in the classification of olive oil according to its quality. For this purpose, tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Nicolás, María, Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia, Arce, Lourdes, Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel, Viñas, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091288
_version_ 1783594133704671232
author García-Nicolás, María
Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia
Arce, Lourdes
Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel
Viñas, Pilar
author_facet García-Nicolás, María
Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia
Arce, Lourdes
Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel
Viñas, Pilar
author_sort García-Nicolás, María
collection PubMed
description Due to its multiple advantages, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is being considered as a complementary technique to mass spectrometry (MS). The goal of this work is to investigate and compare the capacity of IMS and MS in the classification of olive oil according to its quality. For this purpose, two analytical methods based on headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) coupled with MS or with IMS have been optimized and characterized for the determination of volatile organic compounds from olive oil samples. Both detectors were compared in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, demonstrating that complementary data were obtained and both detectors have proven to be complementary. MS and IMS showed similar selectivity (10 out of 38 compounds were detected by HS-GC-IMS, whereas twelve compounds were detected by HS-GC-MS). However, IMS presented slightly better sensitivity (Limits of quantification (LOQ) ranged between 0.08 and 0.8 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-IMS, and between 0.2 and 2.1 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-MS). Finally, the potential of both detectors coupled with HS-GC for classification of olive oil samples depending on its quality was investigated. In this case, similar results were obtained when using both HS-GC-MS and HS-GC-IMS equipment (85.71 % of samples of the external validation set were classified correctly (validation rate)) and, although both techniques were shown to be complementary, data fusion did not improve validation results (80.95% validation rate).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7555980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75559802020-10-19 Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case García-Nicolás, María Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia Arce, Lourdes Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel Viñas, Pilar Foods Article Due to its multiple advantages, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is being considered as a complementary technique to mass spectrometry (MS). The goal of this work is to investigate and compare the capacity of IMS and MS in the classification of olive oil according to its quality. For this purpose, two analytical methods based on headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) coupled with MS or with IMS have been optimized and characterized for the determination of volatile organic compounds from olive oil samples. Both detectors were compared in terms of sensitivity and selectivity, demonstrating that complementary data were obtained and both detectors have proven to be complementary. MS and IMS showed similar selectivity (10 out of 38 compounds were detected by HS-GC-IMS, whereas twelve compounds were detected by HS-GC-MS). However, IMS presented slightly better sensitivity (Limits of quantification (LOQ) ranged between 0.08 and 0.8 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-IMS, and between 0.2 and 2.1 µg g(−1) for HS-GC-MS). Finally, the potential of both detectors coupled with HS-GC for classification of olive oil samples depending on its quality was investigated. In this case, similar results were obtained when using both HS-GC-MS and HS-GC-IMS equipment (85.71 % of samples of the external validation set were classified correctly (validation rate)) and, although both techniques were shown to be complementary, data fusion did not improve validation results (80.95% validation rate). MDPI 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7555980/ /pubmed/32937810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091288 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
García-Nicolás, María
Arroyo-Manzanares, Natalia
Arce, Lourdes
Hernández-Córdoba, Manuel
Viñas, Pilar
Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case
title Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case
title_full Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case
title_fullStr Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case
title_full_unstemmed Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case
title_short Headspace Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Classification of Virgin Olive Oils as a Study Case
title_sort headspace gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry: classification of virgin olive oils as a study case
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7555980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091288
work_keys_str_mv AT garcianicolasmaria headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase
AT arroyomanzanaresnatalia headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase
AT arcelourdes headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase
AT hernandezcordobamanuel headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase
AT vinaspilar headspacegaschromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryandionmobilityspectrometryclassificationofvirginoliveoilsasastudycase