Cargando…

Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review

Preventive transhepatic tract embolisation (PTTE) after percutaneous biliary intervention (PBI) may reduce adverse events. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PTTE with different embolic agents. A systematic literature research was performed accordin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitz, Daniel, Chang, De-Hua, Rudi, Jochen, Hetjens, Svetlana, Ebert, Matthias P. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8849284
_version_ 1783594154692968448
author Schmitz, Daniel
Chang, De-Hua
Rudi, Jochen
Hetjens, Svetlana
Ebert, Matthias P. A.
author_facet Schmitz, Daniel
Chang, De-Hua
Rudi, Jochen
Hetjens, Svetlana
Ebert, Matthias P. A.
author_sort Schmitz, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Preventive transhepatic tract embolisation (PTTE) after percutaneous biliary intervention (PBI) may reduce adverse events. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PTTE with different embolic agents. A systematic literature research was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The identified studies were analysed concerning study quality, number of cases, indication, embolic agent, embolisation technique, success, and embolisation-related adverse events. Out of 62 identified records, 7 studies of mainly moderate study quality published through 2019 were included for further analysis. Cyanoacrylate (n = 4), gelatin sponge (n = 2), and coils (n = 1) were used as embolic agents in a total number of 314 patients. Technical success was 96–100%. Embolisation-related adverse events (glue migration, pain) occurred in 10/314 (3.2%) patients. Reduction of PBI-related pain was approved by one controlled study; haemorrhage events were reduced but not clearly significant. Overall, biliary leak, transhepatic bleeding, and PBI-related pain occurred in 7/201 (3.5%), 1/293 (0.3%), and 17/46 (36.9%) documented patients after PTTE. Adverse events which likely could not have been prevented by PTTE occurred in 23/180 (12.8%) patients. Embolic agents were not compared. In conclusion, PTTE is feasible and safe. It is effective concerning the prevention of PBI-related pain, and it may be effective concerning haemorrhage. Prevention of biliary leak is not proven. It remains unclear which embolic agent should be preferred. A prospective randomised trial including all preventable adverse events is lacking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7556068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75560682020-10-19 Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review Schmitz, Daniel Chang, De-Hua Rudi, Jochen Hetjens, Svetlana Ebert, Matthias P. A. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Review Article Preventive transhepatic tract embolisation (PTTE) after percutaneous biliary intervention (PBI) may reduce adverse events. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PTTE with different embolic agents. A systematic literature research was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The identified studies were analysed concerning study quality, number of cases, indication, embolic agent, embolisation technique, success, and embolisation-related adverse events. Out of 62 identified records, 7 studies of mainly moderate study quality published through 2019 were included for further analysis. Cyanoacrylate (n = 4), gelatin sponge (n = 2), and coils (n = 1) were used as embolic agents in a total number of 314 patients. Technical success was 96–100%. Embolisation-related adverse events (glue migration, pain) occurred in 10/314 (3.2%) patients. Reduction of PBI-related pain was approved by one controlled study; haemorrhage events were reduced but not clearly significant. Overall, biliary leak, transhepatic bleeding, and PBI-related pain occurred in 7/201 (3.5%), 1/293 (0.3%), and 17/46 (36.9%) documented patients after PTTE. Adverse events which likely could not have been prevented by PTTE occurred in 23/180 (12.8%) patients. Embolic agents were not compared. In conclusion, PTTE is feasible and safe. It is effective concerning the prevention of PBI-related pain, and it may be effective concerning haemorrhage. Prevention of biliary leak is not proven. It remains unclear which embolic agent should be preferred. A prospective randomised trial including all preventable adverse events is lacking. Hindawi 2020-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7556068/ /pubmed/33083384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8849284 Text en Copyright © 2020 Daniel Schmitz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Schmitz, Daniel
Chang, De-Hua
Rudi, Jochen
Hetjens, Svetlana
Ebert, Matthias P. A.
Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review
title Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_full Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_short Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review
title_sort preventive transhepatic tract embolisation after percutaneous biliary interventions: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8849284
work_keys_str_mv AT schmitzdaniel preventivetranshepatictractembolisationafterpercutaneousbiliaryinterventionsasystematicreview
AT changdehua preventivetranshepatictractembolisationafterpercutaneousbiliaryinterventionsasystematicreview
AT rudijochen preventivetranshepatictractembolisationafterpercutaneousbiliaryinterventionsasystematicreview
AT hetjenssvetlana preventivetranshepatictractembolisationafterpercutaneousbiliaryinterventionsasystematicreview
AT ebertmatthiaspa preventivetranshepatictractembolisationafterpercutaneousbiliaryinterventionsasystematicreview