Cargando…

Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments

CONTEXT: The current upsurge in telehealth use in palliative and hospice care warrants consideration of patient, family caregiver, and interdisciplinary palliative perspectives on telehealth modality and communication experiences. Currently, telehealth experiences and encounters are being described...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weaver, Meaghann S., Lukowski, Joe, Wichman, Brittany, Navaneethan, Hema, Fisher, Alfred L., Neumann, Marie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.010
_version_ 1783594188457115648
author Weaver, Meaghann S.
Lukowski, Joe
Wichman, Brittany
Navaneethan, Hema
Fisher, Alfred L.
Neumann, Marie L.
author_facet Weaver, Meaghann S.
Lukowski, Joe
Wichman, Brittany
Navaneethan, Hema
Fisher, Alfred L.
Neumann, Marie L.
author_sort Weaver, Meaghann S.
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: The current upsurge in telehealth use in palliative and hospice care warrants consideration of patient, family caregiver, and interdisciplinary palliative perspectives on telehealth modality and communication experiences. Currently, telehealth experiences and encounters are being described but not yet extensively evaluated by palliative care teams. OBJECTIVES: To locate survey instruments available to assess telehealth interactions, to determine the content and constructs covered by the available instruments, and to describe the patient populations previously surveyed by the existing instruments. METHODS: This study and its reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with the protocol registered in The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Three databases were searched with over 3100 articles analyzed for use of a telehealth survey instrument. RESULTS: Twelve telehealth communication assessment instruments were identified with a mean length of 20 questions, primarily Likert-scale responses with one inclusive of free text and one qualitative inquiry survey. Three inquired only into modality, four queried communication, and five studied both modality and communication experience. Existing telehealth survey instruments are unidirectional in exploring patient or family experience, with two inclusive of provider perspectives. Participant demographics are notably underreported in telehealth experience studies with a frank lack of diversity in ethnic/racial, geographic, age, educational, and income representativeness in current telehealth survey instrument respondents. CONCLUSION: Palliative care teams may consider familiarity with telehealth survey instrument as an essential component to progress from description of telehealth use to evaluation of telehealth encounters. Current survey instrument outcome reports do not represent inclusivity or diversity, although telehealth is now being clinically applied across settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7556265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75562652020-10-14 Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments Weaver, Meaghann S. Lukowski, Joe Wichman, Brittany Navaneethan, Hema Fisher, Alfred L. Neumann, Marie L. J Pain Symptom Manage Review Article CONTEXT: The current upsurge in telehealth use in palliative and hospice care warrants consideration of patient, family caregiver, and interdisciplinary palliative perspectives on telehealth modality and communication experiences. Currently, telehealth experiences and encounters are being described but not yet extensively evaluated by palliative care teams. OBJECTIVES: To locate survey instruments available to assess telehealth interactions, to determine the content and constructs covered by the available instruments, and to describe the patient populations previously surveyed by the existing instruments. METHODS: This study and its reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with the protocol registered in The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Three databases were searched with over 3100 articles analyzed for use of a telehealth survey instrument. RESULTS: Twelve telehealth communication assessment instruments were identified with a mean length of 20 questions, primarily Likert-scale responses with one inclusive of free text and one qualitative inquiry survey. Three inquired only into modality, four queried communication, and five studied both modality and communication experience. Existing telehealth survey instruments are unidirectional in exploring patient or family experience, with two inclusive of provider perspectives. Participant demographics are notably underreported in telehealth experience studies with a frank lack of diversity in ethnic/racial, geographic, age, educational, and income representativeness in current telehealth survey instrument respondents. CONCLUSION: Palliative care teams may consider familiarity with telehealth survey instrument as an essential component to progress from description of telehealth use to evaluation of telehealth encounters. Current survey instrument outcome reports do not represent inclusivity or diversity, although telehealth is now being clinically applied across settings. American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7556265/ /pubmed/33068709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.010 Text en © 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Article
Weaver, Meaghann S.
Lukowski, Joe
Wichman, Brittany
Navaneethan, Hema
Fisher, Alfred L.
Neumann, Marie L.
Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments
title Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments
title_full Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments
title_fullStr Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments
title_full_unstemmed Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments
title_short Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments
title_sort human connection and technology connectivity: a systematic review of available telehealth survey instruments
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.010
work_keys_str_mv AT weavermeaghanns humanconnectionandtechnologyconnectivityasystematicreviewofavailabletelehealthsurveyinstruments
AT lukowskijoe humanconnectionandtechnologyconnectivityasystematicreviewofavailabletelehealthsurveyinstruments
AT wichmanbrittany humanconnectionandtechnologyconnectivityasystematicreviewofavailabletelehealthsurveyinstruments
AT navaneethanhema humanconnectionandtechnologyconnectivityasystematicreviewofavailabletelehealthsurveyinstruments
AT fisheralfredl humanconnectionandtechnologyconnectivityasystematicreviewofavailabletelehealthsurveyinstruments
AT neumannmariel humanconnectionandtechnologyconnectivityasystematicreviewofavailabletelehealthsurveyinstruments