Cargando…
A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study
BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs can optimize clinical outcomes and have been widely used across multiple specialties, but a personalized prediction model involving ERAS for the prognosis of gastric cancer is lacking. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038207 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.926347 |
_version_ | 1783594194655248384 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Yuqi Li, Zequn Liu, Xiaodong Cao, Shougen Liu, Xuechao Hu, Chuan Tian, Yulong Xu, Jianfei Wang, Daosheng Zhou, Xin Zhou, Yanbing |
author_facet | Sun, Yuqi Li, Zequn Liu, Xiaodong Cao, Shougen Liu, Xuechao Hu, Chuan Tian, Yulong Xu, Jianfei Wang, Daosheng Zhou, Xin Zhou, Yanbing |
author_sort | Sun, Yuqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs can optimize clinical outcomes and have been widely used across multiple specialties, but a personalized prediction model involving ERAS for the prognosis of gastric cancer is lacking. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on 725 gastric cancer patients within ERAS who underwent curative gastric resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2007 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional risk model were used to determine the independent prognostic factors of patients. The accuracy of model was evaluated by C-index, calibration curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the nomogram model with the predictive value of TNM staging system. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of 725 patients within ERAS was 72.5%. Age at diagnosis, T stage, N stage, and postoperative complications were determined to be independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients within ERAS, and nomogram model was constructed. The C-index of the training group was 0.809 and that of the verification group was 0.804; the calibration curves and DCA of the 2 groups showed good accuracy. Through verification, we found that, compared with the TNM staging assessment method, the nomogram model was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer, and we constructed the first prognostic nomogram model in ERAS mode to facilitate postoperative personalized prognostic evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7556291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75562912021-03-04 A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study Sun, Yuqi Li, Zequn Liu, Xiaodong Cao, Shougen Liu, Xuechao Hu, Chuan Tian, Yulong Xu, Jianfei Wang, Daosheng Zhou, Xin Zhou, Yanbing Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs can optimize clinical outcomes and have been widely used across multiple specialties, but a personalized prediction model involving ERAS for the prognosis of gastric cancer is lacking. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on 725 gastric cancer patients within ERAS who underwent curative gastric resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2007 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional risk model were used to determine the independent prognostic factors of patients. The accuracy of model was evaluated by C-index, calibration curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the nomogram model with the predictive value of TNM staging system. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of 725 patients within ERAS was 72.5%. Age at diagnosis, T stage, N stage, and postoperative complications were determined to be independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients within ERAS, and nomogram model was constructed. The C-index of the training group was 0.809 and that of the verification group was 0.804; the calibration curves and DCA of the 2 groups showed good accuracy. Through verification, we found that, compared with the TNM staging assessment method, the nomogram model was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer, and we constructed the first prognostic nomogram model in ERAS mode to facilitate postoperative personalized prognostic evaluation. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7556291/ /pubmed/33038207 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.926347 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Sun, Yuqi Li, Zequn Liu, Xiaodong Cao, Shougen Liu, Xuechao Hu, Chuan Tian, Yulong Xu, Jianfei Wang, Daosheng Zhou, Xin Zhou, Yanbing A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title | A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_full | A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_short | A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study |
title_sort | nomogram for prediction of survival in patients after gastrectomy within enhanced recovery after surgery (eras): a single-center retrospective study |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038207 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.926347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunyuqi anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT lizequn anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT liuxiaodong anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT caoshougen anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT liuxuechao anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT huchuan anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT tianyulong anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT xujianfei anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT wangdaosheng anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT zhouxin anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT zhouyanbing anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT sunyuqi nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT lizequn nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT liuxiaodong nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT caoshougen nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT liuxuechao nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT huchuan nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT tianyulong nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT xujianfei nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT wangdaosheng nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT zhouxin nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT zhouyanbing nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy |