Cargando…

A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs can optimize clinical outcomes and have been widely used across multiple specialties, but a personalized prediction model involving ERAS for the prognosis of gastric cancer is lacking. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yuqi, Li, Zequn, Liu, Xiaodong, Cao, Shougen, Liu, Xuechao, Hu, Chuan, Tian, Yulong, Xu, Jianfei, Wang, Daosheng, Zhou, Xin, Zhou, Yanbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038207
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.926347
_version_ 1783594194655248384
author Sun, Yuqi
Li, Zequn
Liu, Xiaodong
Cao, Shougen
Liu, Xuechao
Hu, Chuan
Tian, Yulong
Xu, Jianfei
Wang, Daosheng
Zhou, Xin
Zhou, Yanbing
author_facet Sun, Yuqi
Li, Zequn
Liu, Xiaodong
Cao, Shougen
Liu, Xuechao
Hu, Chuan
Tian, Yulong
Xu, Jianfei
Wang, Daosheng
Zhou, Xin
Zhou, Yanbing
author_sort Sun, Yuqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs can optimize clinical outcomes and have been widely used across multiple specialties, but a personalized prediction model involving ERAS for the prognosis of gastric cancer is lacking. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on 725 gastric cancer patients within ERAS who underwent curative gastric resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2007 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional risk model were used to determine the independent prognostic factors of patients. The accuracy of model was evaluated by C-index, calibration curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the nomogram model with the predictive value of TNM staging system. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of 725 patients within ERAS was 72.5%. Age at diagnosis, T stage, N stage, and postoperative complications were determined to be independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients within ERAS, and nomogram model was constructed. The C-index of the training group was 0.809 and that of the verification group was 0.804; the calibration curves and DCA of the 2 groups showed good accuracy. Through verification, we found that, compared with the TNM staging assessment method, the nomogram model was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer, and we constructed the first prognostic nomogram model in ERAS mode to facilitate postoperative personalized prognostic evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7556291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75562912021-03-04 A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study Sun, Yuqi Li, Zequn Liu, Xiaodong Cao, Shougen Liu, Xuechao Hu, Chuan Tian, Yulong Xu, Jianfei Wang, Daosheng Zhou, Xin Zhou, Yanbing Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs can optimize clinical outcomes and have been widely used across multiple specialties, but a personalized prediction model involving ERAS for the prognosis of gastric cancer is lacking. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on 725 gastric cancer patients within ERAS who underwent curative gastric resection in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2007 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional risk model were used to determine the independent prognostic factors of patients. The accuracy of model was evaluated by C-index, calibration curve, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the nomogram model with the predictive value of TNM staging system. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) of 725 patients within ERAS was 72.5%. Age at diagnosis, T stage, N stage, and postoperative complications were determined to be independent factors affecting the prognosis of patients within ERAS, and nomogram model was constructed. The C-index of the training group was 0.809 and that of the verification group was 0.804; the calibration curves and DCA of the 2 groups showed good accuracy. Through verification, we found that, compared with the TNM staging assessment method, the nomogram model was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified factors affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer, and we constructed the first prognostic nomogram model in ERAS mode to facilitate postoperative personalized prognostic evaluation. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7556291/ /pubmed/33038207 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.926347 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Sun, Yuqi
Li, Zequn
Liu, Xiaodong
Cao, Shougen
Liu, Xuechao
Hu, Chuan
Tian, Yulong
Xu, Jianfei
Wang, Daosheng
Zhou, Xin
Zhou, Yanbing
A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_fullStr A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_short A Nomogram for Prediction of Survival in Patients After Gastrectomy Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): A Single-Center Retrospective Study
title_sort nomogram for prediction of survival in patients after gastrectomy within enhanced recovery after surgery (eras): a single-center retrospective study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33038207
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.926347
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyuqi anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT lizequn anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT liuxiaodong anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT caoshougen anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT liuxuechao anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT huchuan anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT tianyulong anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT xujianfei anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT wangdaosheng anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhouxin anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhouyanbing anomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT sunyuqi nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT lizequn nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT liuxiaodong nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT caoshougen nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT liuxuechao nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT huchuan nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT tianyulong nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT xujianfei nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT wangdaosheng nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhouxin nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhouyanbing nomogramforpredictionofsurvivalinpatientsaftergastrectomywithinenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasasinglecenterretrospectivestudy