Cargando…
Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: Numerous cases of gentamicin underdosing have been described in the literature in the context of sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care units (ICU). A survey of clinical practice was conducted with the aim to rationalise the use of gentamicin in the unit. The secondary obje...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103145 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.57255 |
_version_ | 1783594262959489024 |
---|---|
author | Pernod, Cyril Lamblin, Antoine Cividjian, Andrei Gerome, Patrick Pierre-François, Wey |
author_facet | Pernod, Cyril Lamblin, Antoine Cividjian, Andrei Gerome, Patrick Pierre-François, Wey |
author_sort | Pernod, Cyril |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Numerous cases of gentamicin underdosing have been described in the literature in the context of sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care units (ICU). A survey of clinical practice was conducted with the aim to rationalise the use of gentamicin in the unit. The secondary objective was to propose a corrective formula for adjusting individual dosage. METHODS: A single-centre survey was used to determine the initial dose of gentamicin administered, in an anaesthesia-ICU, during the first hours of sepsis/septic shock. An initial retrospective phase allowed focusing on the points of improvement in terms of prescription. A second prospective phase enabled the evaluation of benefits following the implemented changes. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included during the retrospective phase (2014–2015) and 28 patients during the prospective phase (2016–2017). Out-of-guideline prescriptions significantly decreased between these two study periods (i.e., pulmonary infections decreased from 70.5% to 18%, p<0.001) and the mean±standard deviation administered dosage increased from 7.3±1.2 mg kg(−1) to 9.5±1.5 mg kg(−1) (p<0.001). Nevertheless, the proportion of Cmax (peak plasma concentration) ≥30 mg L(−1) and the mean Cmax did not change significantly. A significant association (p<0.05) was found between Cmax, body mass index, haematocrit and creatinine, enabling a corrective formula to be proposed. CONCLUSION: The present study allowed improvement in gentamicin prescription in an anaesthesia-ICU. A Cmax ≥30 mg L(−1) remains difficult to achieve, but a Cmax ≥16 mg L(−1) could be considered relevant for community infections and would be more attainable. A corrective formula could be used to adjust the dosage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7556638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75566382020-10-23 Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation Pernod, Cyril Lamblin, Antoine Cividjian, Andrei Gerome, Patrick Pierre-François, Wey Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: Numerous cases of gentamicin underdosing have been described in the literature in the context of sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care units (ICU). A survey of clinical practice was conducted with the aim to rationalise the use of gentamicin in the unit. The secondary objective was to propose a corrective formula for adjusting individual dosage. METHODS: A single-centre survey was used to determine the initial dose of gentamicin administered, in an anaesthesia-ICU, during the first hours of sepsis/septic shock. An initial retrospective phase allowed focusing on the points of improvement in terms of prescription. A second prospective phase enabled the evaluation of benefits following the implemented changes. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included during the retrospective phase (2014–2015) and 28 patients during the prospective phase (2016–2017). Out-of-guideline prescriptions significantly decreased between these two study periods (i.e., pulmonary infections decreased from 70.5% to 18%, p<0.001) and the mean±standard deviation administered dosage increased from 7.3±1.2 mg kg(−1) to 9.5±1.5 mg kg(−1) (p<0.001). Nevertheless, the proportion of Cmax (peak plasma concentration) ≥30 mg L(−1) and the mean Cmax did not change significantly. A significant association (p<0.05) was found between Cmax, body mass index, haematocrit and creatinine, enabling a corrective formula to be proposed. CONCLUSION: The present study allowed improvement in gentamicin prescription in an anaesthesia-ICU. A Cmax ≥30 mg L(−1) remains difficult to achieve, but a Cmax ≥16 mg L(−1) could be considered relevant for community infections and would be more attainable. A corrective formula could be used to adjust the dosage. Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2020-10 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7556638/ /pubmed/33103145 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.57255 Text en © Copyright 2020 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pernod, Cyril Lamblin, Antoine Cividjian, Andrei Gerome, Patrick Pierre-François, Wey Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation |
title | Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation |
title_full | Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation |
title_short | Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation |
title_sort | use of gentamicin for sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care unit: a clinical practice evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103145 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.57255 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pernodcyril useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation AT lamblinantoine useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation AT cividjianandrei useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation AT geromepatrick useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation AT pierrefrancoiswey useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation |