Cargando…

Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation

OBJECTIVE: Numerous cases of gentamicin underdosing have been described in the literature in the context of sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care units (ICU). A survey of clinical practice was conducted with the aim to rationalise the use of gentamicin in the unit. The secondary obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pernod, Cyril, Lamblin, Antoine, Cividjian, Andrei, Gerome, Patrick, Pierre-François, Wey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103145
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.57255
_version_ 1783594262959489024
author Pernod, Cyril
Lamblin, Antoine
Cividjian, Andrei
Gerome, Patrick
Pierre-François, Wey
author_facet Pernod, Cyril
Lamblin, Antoine
Cividjian, Andrei
Gerome, Patrick
Pierre-François, Wey
author_sort Pernod, Cyril
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Numerous cases of gentamicin underdosing have been described in the literature in the context of sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care units (ICU). A survey of clinical practice was conducted with the aim to rationalise the use of gentamicin in the unit. The secondary objective was to propose a corrective formula for adjusting individual dosage. METHODS: A single-centre survey was used to determine the initial dose of gentamicin administered, in an anaesthesia-ICU, during the first hours of sepsis/septic shock. An initial retrospective phase allowed focusing on the points of improvement in terms of prescription. A second prospective phase enabled the evaluation of benefits following the implemented changes. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included during the retrospective phase (2014–2015) and 28 patients during the prospective phase (2016–2017). Out-of-guideline prescriptions significantly decreased between these two study periods (i.e., pulmonary infections decreased from 70.5% to 18%, p<0.001) and the mean±standard deviation administered dosage increased from 7.3±1.2 mg kg(−1) to 9.5±1.5 mg kg(−1) (p<0.001). Nevertheless, the proportion of Cmax (peak plasma concentration) ≥30 mg L(−1) and the mean Cmax did not change significantly. A significant association (p<0.05) was found between Cmax, body mass index, haematocrit and creatinine, enabling a corrective formula to be proposed. CONCLUSION: The present study allowed improvement in gentamicin prescription in an anaesthesia-ICU. A Cmax ≥30 mg L(−1) remains difficult to achieve, but a Cmax ≥16 mg L(−1) could be considered relevant for community infections and would be more attainable. A corrective formula could be used to adjust the dosage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7556638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75566382020-10-23 Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation Pernod, Cyril Lamblin, Antoine Cividjian, Andrei Gerome, Patrick Pierre-François, Wey Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Article OBJECTIVE: Numerous cases of gentamicin underdosing have been described in the literature in the context of sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care units (ICU). A survey of clinical practice was conducted with the aim to rationalise the use of gentamicin in the unit. The secondary objective was to propose a corrective formula for adjusting individual dosage. METHODS: A single-centre survey was used to determine the initial dose of gentamicin administered, in an anaesthesia-ICU, during the first hours of sepsis/septic shock. An initial retrospective phase allowed focusing on the points of improvement in terms of prescription. A second prospective phase enabled the evaluation of benefits following the implemented changes. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included during the retrospective phase (2014–2015) and 28 patients during the prospective phase (2016–2017). Out-of-guideline prescriptions significantly decreased between these two study periods (i.e., pulmonary infections decreased from 70.5% to 18%, p<0.001) and the mean±standard deviation administered dosage increased from 7.3±1.2 mg kg(−1) to 9.5±1.5 mg kg(−1) (p<0.001). Nevertheless, the proportion of Cmax (peak plasma concentration) ≥30 mg L(−1) and the mean Cmax did not change significantly. A significant association (p<0.05) was found between Cmax, body mass index, haematocrit and creatinine, enabling a corrective formula to be proposed. CONCLUSION: The present study allowed improvement in gentamicin prescription in an anaesthesia-ICU. A Cmax ≥30 mg L(−1) remains difficult to achieve, but a Cmax ≥16 mg L(−1) could be considered relevant for community infections and would be more attainable. A corrective formula could be used to adjust the dosage. Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2020-10 2019-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7556638/ /pubmed/33103145 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.57255 Text en © Copyright 2020 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Article
Pernod, Cyril
Lamblin, Antoine
Cividjian, Andrei
Gerome, Patrick
Pierre-François, Wey
Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation
title Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation
title_full Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation
title_fullStr Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation
title_short Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation
title_sort use of gentamicin for sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care unit: a clinical practice evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33103145
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2019.57255
work_keys_str_mv AT pernodcyril useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation
AT lamblinantoine useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation
AT cividjianandrei useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation
AT geromepatrick useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation
AT pierrefrancoiswey useofgentamicinforsepsisandsepticshockinanaesthesiaintensivecareunitaclinicalpracticeevaluation