Cargando…

Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review

New classification systems based on molecular features have been introduced to improve precision medicine for prostate cancer (PCa). This review covers the increasing risk of PCa and the differences in response to targeted therapy that are related to specific gene variations. We believe that genomic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Jae-Seung, Morgan, Todd M., Hong, Sung Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.09.001
_version_ 1783594365139025920
author Chung, Jae-Seung
Morgan, Todd M.
Hong, Sung Kyu
author_facet Chung, Jae-Seung
Morgan, Todd M.
Hong, Sung Kyu
author_sort Chung, Jae-Seung
collection PubMed
description New classification systems based on molecular features have been introduced to improve precision medicine for prostate cancer (PCa). This review covers the increasing risk of PCa and the differences in response to targeted therapy that are related to specific gene variations. We believe that genomic evaluations will be useful for guiding PCa risk stratification, screening, and treatment. We searched the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for articles related to genomic testing for PCa that were published in 2020 or earlier. There is increasing evidence that germline mutations in DNA repair genes, such as BRCA1/2 or ATM, are closely related to the development and aggressiveness of PCa. Targeted prostate-specific antigen screening based on the presence of germline alterations in DNA repair genes is recommend to achieve an early diagnosis of PCa. In cases of localized PCa, even if it has a favorable risk classification, patients under active surveillance with these gene alterations are likely to develop aggressive PCa. Thus, active treatment may be preferable to active surveillance for these patients. In cases of metastatic castration–resistant PCa, BRCA1/2 and DNA mismatch repair genes may be useful biomarkers for predicting the response to androgen receptor–targeting agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, platinum chemotherapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radium-223. Genomic evaluations may allow for risk stratification of patients with PCa based on their molecular features, which may help guide precision medicine for treating PCa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7557186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75571862020-10-23 Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review Chung, Jae-Seung Morgan, Todd M. Hong, Sung Kyu Prostate Int Review Article New classification systems based on molecular features have been introduced to improve precision medicine for prostate cancer (PCa). This review covers the increasing risk of PCa and the differences in response to targeted therapy that are related to specific gene variations. We believe that genomic evaluations will be useful for guiding PCa risk stratification, screening, and treatment. We searched the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for articles related to genomic testing for PCa that were published in 2020 or earlier. There is increasing evidence that germline mutations in DNA repair genes, such as BRCA1/2 or ATM, are closely related to the development and aggressiveness of PCa. Targeted prostate-specific antigen screening based on the presence of germline alterations in DNA repair genes is recommend to achieve an early diagnosis of PCa. In cases of localized PCa, even if it has a favorable risk classification, patients under active surveillance with these gene alterations are likely to develop aggressive PCa. Thus, active treatment may be preferable to active surveillance for these patients. In cases of metastatic castration–resistant PCa, BRCA1/2 and DNA mismatch repair genes may be useful biomarkers for predicting the response to androgen receptor–targeting agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, platinum chemotherapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radium-223. Genomic evaluations may allow for risk stratification of patients with PCa based on their molecular features, which may help guide precision medicine for treating PCa. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2020-09 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7557186/ /pubmed/33102389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.09.001 Text en © 2020 Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Chung, Jae-Seung
Morgan, Todd M.
Hong, Sung Kyu
Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review
title Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review
title_full Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review
title_fullStr Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review
title_short Clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review
title_sort clinical implications of genomic evaluations for prostate cancer risk stratification, screening, and treatment: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33102389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2020.09.001
work_keys_str_mv AT chungjaeseung clinicalimplicationsofgenomicevaluationsforprostatecancerriskstratificationscreeningandtreatmentanarrativereview
AT morgantoddm clinicalimplicationsofgenomicevaluationsforprostatecancerriskstratificationscreeningandtreatmentanarrativereview
AT hongsungkyu clinicalimplicationsofgenomicevaluationsforprostatecancerriskstratificationscreeningandtreatmentanarrativereview