Cargando…
Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study
To clarify the effect of different respiratory sample types on SARS-CoV-2 detection, we collected throat swabs, nasal swabs and hock-a-loogie saliva or sputum, and compared their detection rates and viral loads. The detection rates of sputum (95.65%, 22/23) and hock-a-loogie saliva (88.09%, 37/42) w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.004 |
_version_ | 1783594367963889664 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Jian Yu, Fei Wang, Xiang Zou, Qianda Lou, Bin Xie, Guoliang Yang, Xianzhi Chen, Weizhen Wang, Qi Zhang, Dan Wang, Ruonan Feng, Baihuan Dong, Yuejiao Huang, Li Teng, Yun Deng, Zhenzhen Yu, Ling Xu, Kaijin Sheng, Jifang Zheng, Shufa Chen, Yu |
author_facet | Fan, Jian Yu, Fei Wang, Xiang Zou, Qianda Lou, Bin Xie, Guoliang Yang, Xianzhi Chen, Weizhen Wang, Qi Zhang, Dan Wang, Ruonan Feng, Baihuan Dong, Yuejiao Huang, Li Teng, Yun Deng, Zhenzhen Yu, Ling Xu, Kaijin Sheng, Jifang Zheng, Shufa Chen, Yu |
author_sort | Fan, Jian |
collection | PubMed |
description | To clarify the effect of different respiratory sample types on SARS-CoV-2 detection, we collected throat swabs, nasal swabs and hock-a-loogie saliva or sputum, and compared their detection rates and viral loads. The detection rates of sputum (95.65%, 22/23) and hock-a-loogie saliva (88.09%, 37/42) were significantly higher than those in throat swabs (41.54%, 27/65) and nasal swabs (72.31%, 47/65) (P < 0.001). The Ct Values of sputum, hock-a-loogie saliva and nasal swabs were significantly higher than that in throat swabs, whereas no significant difference was observed between sputum and saliva samples. Hock-a-loogie saliva are reliable sample types that can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2, and worthy of clinical promotion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7557199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75571992020-10-15 Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study Fan, Jian Yu, Fei Wang, Xiang Zou, Qianda Lou, Bin Xie, Guoliang Yang, Xianzhi Chen, Weizhen Wang, Qi Zhang, Dan Wang, Ruonan Feng, Baihuan Dong, Yuejiao Huang, Li Teng, Yun Deng, Zhenzhen Yu, Ling Xu, Kaijin Sheng, Jifang Zheng, Shufa Chen, Yu Clin Chim Acta Article To clarify the effect of different respiratory sample types on SARS-CoV-2 detection, we collected throat swabs, nasal swabs and hock-a-loogie saliva or sputum, and compared their detection rates and viral loads. The detection rates of sputum (95.65%, 22/23) and hock-a-loogie saliva (88.09%, 37/42) were significantly higher than those in throat swabs (41.54%, 27/65) and nasal swabs (72.31%, 47/65) (P < 0.001). The Ct Values of sputum, hock-a-loogie saliva and nasal swabs were significantly higher than that in throat swabs, whereas no significant difference was observed between sputum and saliva samples. Hock-a-loogie saliva are reliable sample types that can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2, and worthy of clinical promotion. Elsevier B.V. 2020-12 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7557199/ /pubmed/33068630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.004 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Fan, Jian Yu, Fei Wang, Xiang Zou, Qianda Lou, Bin Xie, Guoliang Yang, Xianzhi Chen, Weizhen Wang, Qi Zhang, Dan Wang, Ruonan Feng, Baihuan Dong, Yuejiao Huang, Li Teng, Yun Deng, Zhenzhen Yu, Ling Xu, Kaijin Sheng, Jifang Zheng, Shufa Chen, Yu Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study |
title | Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study |
title_full | Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study |
title_fullStr | Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study |
title_full_unstemmed | Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study |
title_short | Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: A diagnostic validity study |
title_sort | hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for sars-cov-2 by a pcr-based assay: a diagnostic validity study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33068630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanjian hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT yufei hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT wangxiang hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT zouqianda hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT loubin hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT xieguoliang hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT yangxianzhi hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT chenweizhen hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT wangqi hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT zhangdan hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT wangruonan hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT fengbaihuan hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT dongyuejiao hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT huangli hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT tengyun hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT dengzhenzhen hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT yuling hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT xukaijin hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT shengjifang hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT zhengshufa hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy AT chenyu hockaloogiesalivaasadiagnosticspecimenforsarscov2byapcrbasedassayadiagnosticvaliditystudy |