Cargando…

Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine

BACKGROUND: (131)I source is widely used in the treatment of hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancers. (131)I emits both beta and gamma-rays. Radiation protection is considered for gamma rays emitted by (131)I. It seems no special shield against (131)I source to be designed. OBJECTIVE: This research aims...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: R., Parvaresh, M., Jalili, A., Haghparast, K., Khoshgard, M. T., Eivazi, M., Ghorbani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134225
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1118
_version_ 1783594426390544384
author R., Parvaresh
M., Jalili
A., Haghparast
K., Khoshgard
M. T., Eivazi
M., Ghorbani
author_facet R., Parvaresh
M., Jalili
A., Haghparast
K., Khoshgard
M. T., Eivazi
M., Ghorbani
author_sort R., Parvaresh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: (131)I source is widely used in the treatment of hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancers. (131)I emits both beta and gamma-rays. Radiation protection is considered for gamma rays emitted by (131)I. It seems no special shield against (131)I source to be designed. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to evaluate determination of optimum shields in nuclear medicine against (99)Tc(m) and (131)I sources by dosimetric method. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulation was used to find the optimum thickness of lead for protection against (131)I source. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an experimental research in the field of radiation protection. A calibrated model of GraetzX5C Plus dosimeter was used to measure exposure rates passing through the shields. The efficiency of the shields was evaluated against (99)Tc(m) and (131)I. Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulation was used to find the optimum thickness of lead for protection against (131)I source. RESULTS: The findings of the dosimetric method show that the minimum and maximum efficiencies obtained by the lead apron with lead equivalent thickness of 0.25 mm and the syringe holder shields with thickness of 0.5 mm lead were 50.86% and 99.50%, respectively. The results of the simulations show that the minimum and maximum efficiencies obtained by lead thicknesses of 1 mm and 43 mm were 19.36% and 99.79%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The optimum shields against (99)Tc(m) are the syringe holder shield, the tungsten syringe shield, and the lead partition, respectively. Furthermore, based on simulations, the thicknesses of 11-28 mm of lead with efficiencies between 90.6% to 99% are suggested as the optimum thicknesses to protect against (131)I source.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7557463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75574632020-10-30 Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine R., Parvaresh M., Jalili A., Haghparast K., Khoshgard M. T., Eivazi M., Ghorbani J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: (131)I source is widely used in the treatment of hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancers. (131)I emits both beta and gamma-rays. Radiation protection is considered for gamma rays emitted by (131)I. It seems no special shield against (131)I source to be designed. OBJECTIVE: This research aims to evaluate determination of optimum shields in nuclear medicine against (99)Tc(m) and (131)I sources by dosimetric method. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulation was used to find the optimum thickness of lead for protection against (131)I source. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an experimental research in the field of radiation protection. A calibrated model of GraetzX5C Plus dosimeter was used to measure exposure rates passing through the shields. The efficiency of the shields was evaluated against (99)Tc(m) and (131)I. Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulation was used to find the optimum thickness of lead for protection against (131)I source. RESULTS: The findings of the dosimetric method show that the minimum and maximum efficiencies obtained by the lead apron with lead equivalent thickness of 0.25 mm and the syringe holder shields with thickness of 0.5 mm lead were 50.86% and 99.50%, respectively. The results of the simulations show that the minimum and maximum efficiencies obtained by lead thicknesses of 1 mm and 43 mm were 19.36% and 99.79%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The optimum shields against (99)Tc(m) are the syringe holder shield, the tungsten syringe shield, and the lead partition, respectively. Furthermore, based on simulations, the thicknesses of 11-28 mm of lead with efficiencies between 90.6% to 99% are suggested as the optimum thicknesses to protect against (131)I source. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7557463/ /pubmed/33134225 http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1118 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
R., Parvaresh
M., Jalili
A., Haghparast
K., Khoshgard
M. T., Eivazi
M., Ghorbani
Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine
title Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine
title_full Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine
title_fullStr Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine
title_short Evaluations for Determination of Optimum Shields in Nuclear Medicine
title_sort evaluations for determination of optimum shields in nuclear medicine
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33134225
http://dx.doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1118
work_keys_str_mv AT rparvaresh evaluationsfordeterminationofoptimumshieldsinnuclearmedicine
AT mjalili evaluationsfordeterminationofoptimumshieldsinnuclearmedicine
AT ahaghparast evaluationsfordeterminationofoptimumshieldsinnuclearmedicine
AT kkhoshgard evaluationsfordeterminationofoptimumshieldsinnuclearmedicine
AT mteivazi evaluationsfordeterminationofoptimumshieldsinnuclearmedicine
AT mghorbani evaluationsfordeterminationofoptimumshieldsinnuclearmedicine