Cargando…

A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) and kinesiotaping (KT) therapies on pain, quality of life, depression, and physical function in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 60 patients (4 males, 56...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yılmaz, Nurdan, Erdal, Akın, Demir, Osman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089092
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.3917
_version_ 1783594463345508352
author Yılmaz, Nurdan
Erdal, Akın
Demir, Osman
author_facet Yılmaz, Nurdan
Erdal, Akın
Demir, Osman
author_sort Yılmaz, Nurdan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) and kinesiotaping (KT) therapies on pain, quality of life, depression, and physical function in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 60 patients (4 males, 56 females; mean age 31.2±9.8 years; range, 18 to 56 years) diagnosed with MPS between January 2014 and June 2014. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: the DN group (n=30) and KT group (n=30). Both groups performed stretching and postural exercises. The scales used for measurements were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, a pressure algometer for the pressure-pain threshold, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) for the quality of life, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for depression, and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) for physical function. The patients were evaluated by a single assessor three times: pre-treatment, at the end of the treatment, and two months after the treatment. RESULTS: Both DN and KT provided significant improvements for all baseline measurements (VAS, pressure pain threshold, all subscales of SF-36, BDI, and NPDS scores) at the end of the treatment and two months after the treatment (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in all measurements (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Kinesiotaping is as an effective method as DN in the treatment of MPS. It can be served as a non-invasive alternative to patients with needle phobia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7557629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75576292020-10-20 A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study Yılmaz, Nurdan Erdal, Akın Demir, Osman Turk J Phys Med Rehabil Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) and kinesiotaping (KT) therapies on pain, quality of life, depression, and physical function in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 60 patients (4 males, 56 females; mean age 31.2±9.8 years; range, 18 to 56 years) diagnosed with MPS between January 2014 and June 2014. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: the DN group (n=30) and KT group (n=30). Both groups performed stretching and postural exercises. The scales used for measurements were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, a pressure algometer for the pressure-pain threshold, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) for the quality of life, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for depression, and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) for physical function. The patients were evaluated by a single assessor three times: pre-treatment, at the end of the treatment, and two months after the treatment. RESULTS: Both DN and KT provided significant improvements for all baseline measurements (VAS, pressure pain threshold, all subscales of SF-36, BDI, and NPDS scores) at the end of the treatment and two months after the treatment (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in all measurements (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Kinesiotaping is as an effective method as DN in the treatment of MPS. It can be served as a non-invasive alternative to patients with needle phobia. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7557629/ /pubmed/33089092 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.3917 Text en Copyright © 2020, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yılmaz, Nurdan
Erdal, Akın
Demir, Osman
A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study
title A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study
title_full A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study
title_fullStr A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study
title_short A comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical study
title_sort comparison of dry needling and kinesiotaping therapies in myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089092
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.3917
work_keys_str_mv AT yılmaznurdan acomparisonofdryneedlingandkinesiotapingtherapiesinmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicalstudy
AT erdalakın acomparisonofdryneedlingandkinesiotapingtherapiesinmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicalstudy
AT demirosman acomparisonofdryneedlingandkinesiotapingtherapiesinmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicalstudy
AT yılmaznurdan comparisonofdryneedlingandkinesiotapingtherapiesinmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicalstudy
AT erdalakın comparisonofdryneedlingandkinesiotapingtherapiesinmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicalstudy
AT demirosman comparisonofdryneedlingandkinesiotapingtherapiesinmyofascialpainsyndromearandomizedclinicalstudy