Cargando…

Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion

Our study aimed to explore the applicability of deep learning and machine learning techniques to distinguish MPE from BPE. We initially used a retrospective cohort with 726 PE patients to train and test the predictive performances of the driverless artificial intelligence (AI), and then stacked with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yuan, Tian, Shan, Huang, Yajun, Dong, Weiguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100896
_version_ 1783594517544304640
author Li, Yuan
Tian, Shan
Huang, Yajun
Dong, Weiguo
author_facet Li, Yuan
Tian, Shan
Huang, Yajun
Dong, Weiguo
author_sort Li, Yuan
collection PubMed
description Our study aimed to explore the applicability of deep learning and machine learning techniques to distinguish MPE from BPE. We initially used a retrospective cohort with 726 PE patients to train and test the predictive performances of the driverless artificial intelligence (AI), and then stacked with a deep learning and five machine learning models, namely gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), extremely randomized trees (XRT), distributed random forest (DRF), and generalized linear models (GLM). Furthermore, a prospective cohort with 172 PE patients was applied to detect the external validity of the predictive models. The area under the curve (AUC) in the training, test and validation set were deep learning (0.995, 0.848, 0.917), GBM (0.981, 0.910, 0.951), XGBoost (0.933, 0.916, 0.935), XRT (0.927, 0.909, 0.963), DRF (0.906, 0.809, 0.969), and GLM (0.898, 0.866, 0.892), respectively. Although the Deep Learning model had the highest AUC in the training set (AUC = 0.995), GBM demonstrated stable and high predictive efficiency in three data sets. The final AI model by stacked ensemble yielded optimal diagnostic performance with AUC of 0.991, 0.912 and 0.953 in the training, test and validation sets, respectively. Using the driverless AI framework based on the routinely collected clinical data could significantly improve diagnostic performance in distinguishing MPE from BPE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7557891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75578912020-10-22 Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion Li, Yuan Tian, Shan Huang, Yajun Dong, Weiguo Transl Oncol Original Research Our study aimed to explore the applicability of deep learning and machine learning techniques to distinguish MPE from BPE. We initially used a retrospective cohort with 726 PE patients to train and test the predictive performances of the driverless artificial intelligence (AI), and then stacked with a deep learning and five machine learning models, namely gradient boosting machine (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), extremely randomized trees (XRT), distributed random forest (DRF), and generalized linear models (GLM). Furthermore, a prospective cohort with 172 PE patients was applied to detect the external validity of the predictive models. The area under the curve (AUC) in the training, test and validation set were deep learning (0.995, 0.848, 0.917), GBM (0.981, 0.910, 0.951), XGBoost (0.933, 0.916, 0.935), XRT (0.927, 0.909, 0.963), DRF (0.906, 0.809, 0.969), and GLM (0.898, 0.866, 0.892), respectively. Although the Deep Learning model had the highest AUC in the training set (AUC = 0.995), GBM demonstrated stable and high predictive efficiency in three data sets. The final AI model by stacked ensemble yielded optimal diagnostic performance with AUC of 0.991, 0.912 and 0.953 in the training, test and validation sets, respectively. Using the driverless AI framework based on the routinely collected clinical data could significantly improve diagnostic performance in distinguishing MPE from BPE. Neoplasia Press 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7557891/ /pubmed/33045678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100896 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Yuan
Tian, Shan
Huang, Yajun
Dong, Weiguo
Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion
title Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion
title_full Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion
title_fullStr Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion
title_full_unstemmed Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion
title_short Driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion
title_sort driverless artificial intelligence framework for the identification of malignant pleural effusion
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100896
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuan driverlessartificialintelligenceframeworkfortheidentificationofmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT tianshan driverlessartificialintelligenceframeworkfortheidentificationofmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT huangyajun driverlessartificialintelligenceframeworkfortheidentificationofmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT dongweiguo driverlessartificialintelligenceframeworkfortheidentificationofmalignantpleuraleffusion