Cargando…
Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients evaluated in the Ophthalmic Genetics clinic at the National Eye Institute (NEI) between 2008 and 2018 were searched for a superficial ODD diagnosis. Color fundus and autofluorescence images were reviewed to confirm ODD, supplemented with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5082706 |
_version_ | 1783594521022431232 |
---|---|
author | Serpen, Jasmine Y. Prasov, Lev Zein, Wadih M. Cukras, Catherine A. Cunningham, Denise Murphy, Elizabeth C. Turriff, Amy Brooks, Brian P. Huryn, Laryssa A. |
author_facet | Serpen, Jasmine Y. Prasov, Lev Zein, Wadih M. Cukras, Catherine A. Cunningham, Denise Murphy, Elizabeth C. Turriff, Amy Brooks, Brian P. Huryn, Laryssa A. |
author_sort | Serpen, Jasmine Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients evaluated in the Ophthalmic Genetics clinic at the National Eye Institute (NEI) between 2008 and 2018 were searched for a superficial ODD diagnosis. Color fundus and autofluorescence images were reviewed to confirm ODD, supplemented with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in uncertain cases when available. Demographic information, examination, and genetic testing were reviewed. Disc areas and disc-to-macula distance to disc diameter ratios (DM : DD) were calculated. RESULTS: Fifty six of 6207 patients had photographically confirmed ODD (0.9%). Drusen were predominantly bilateral (66%), with a female (62%) and Caucasian (73%) predilection. ODD prevalence in our cohort of patients with inherited retinal degenerations was 2.5%, and ODD were more prevalent in the rod-cone dystrophy subgroup at 2.95% (OR = 3.3 [2.1–5.3], P < 0.001) compared to the ophthalmic genetics cohort. Usher patients were more likely to have ODD (10/132, 7.6%, OR = 9.0 [4.3–17.7], P < 0.001) and had significantly smaller discs compared to the rest of our ODD cohort (disc area: P=0.001, DM : DD: P=0.03). Discussion. While an association between ODD and retinitis pigmentosa has been reported, this study surveys a large cohort of patients with inherited eye conditions and finds the prevalence of superficial ODD is lower than that in the literature. Some subpopulations, such as rod-cone dystrophy and Usher syndrome, had a higher prevalence than the cohort as a whole. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7557906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75579062020-10-19 Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort Serpen, Jasmine Y. Prasov, Lev Zein, Wadih M. Cukras, Catherine A. Cunningham, Denise Murphy, Elizabeth C. Turriff, Amy Brooks, Brian P. Huryn, Laryssa A. J Ophthalmol Research Article MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients evaluated in the Ophthalmic Genetics clinic at the National Eye Institute (NEI) between 2008 and 2018 were searched for a superficial ODD diagnosis. Color fundus and autofluorescence images were reviewed to confirm ODD, supplemented with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in uncertain cases when available. Demographic information, examination, and genetic testing were reviewed. Disc areas and disc-to-macula distance to disc diameter ratios (DM : DD) were calculated. RESULTS: Fifty six of 6207 patients had photographically confirmed ODD (0.9%). Drusen were predominantly bilateral (66%), with a female (62%) and Caucasian (73%) predilection. ODD prevalence in our cohort of patients with inherited retinal degenerations was 2.5%, and ODD were more prevalent in the rod-cone dystrophy subgroup at 2.95% (OR = 3.3 [2.1–5.3], P < 0.001) compared to the ophthalmic genetics cohort. Usher patients were more likely to have ODD (10/132, 7.6%, OR = 9.0 [4.3–17.7], P < 0.001) and had significantly smaller discs compared to the rest of our ODD cohort (disc area: P=0.001, DM : DD: P=0.03). Discussion. While an association between ODD and retinitis pigmentosa has been reported, this study surveys a large cohort of patients with inherited eye conditions and finds the prevalence of superficial ODD is lower than that in the literature. Some subpopulations, such as rod-cone dystrophy and Usher syndrome, had a higher prevalence than the cohort as a whole. Hindawi 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7557906/ /pubmed/33083048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5082706 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jasmine Y. Serpen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Serpen, Jasmine Y. Prasov, Lev Zein, Wadih M. Cukras, Catherine A. Cunningham, Denise Murphy, Elizabeth C. Turriff, Amy Brooks, Brian P. Huryn, Laryssa A. Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort |
title | Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort |
title_full | Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort |
title_fullStr | Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort |
title_short | Clinical Features of Optic Disc Drusen in an Ophthalmic Genetics Cohort |
title_sort | clinical features of optic disc drusen in an ophthalmic genetics cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7557906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5082706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serpenjasminey clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT prasovlev clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT zeinwadihm clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT cukrascatherinea clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT cunninghamdenise clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT murphyelizabethc clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT turriffamy clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT brooksbrianp clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort AT hurynlaryssaa clinicalfeaturesofopticdiscdruseninanophthalmicgeneticscohort |