Cargando…

Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity

In this work, the efficiency of a conventional chlorination pretreatment is compared with a novel modified low-fouling polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration (UF) membrane, in terms of bacteria attachment and membrane biofouling reduction. This study highlights the use of membrane modification as an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nady, Norhan, Salem, Noha, Amer, Ranya, El-Shazly, Ahmed, Kandil, Sherif H., Hassouna, Mohamed Salah El-Din
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32927801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090227
_version_ 1783594544901652480
author Nady, Norhan
Salem, Noha
Amer, Ranya
El-Shazly, Ahmed
Kandil, Sherif H.
Hassouna, Mohamed Salah El-Din
author_facet Nady, Norhan
Salem, Noha
Amer, Ranya
El-Shazly, Ahmed
Kandil, Sherif H.
Hassouna, Mohamed Salah El-Din
author_sort Nady, Norhan
collection PubMed
description In this work, the efficiency of a conventional chlorination pretreatment is compared with a novel modified low-fouling polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration (UF) membrane, in terms of bacteria attachment and membrane biofouling reduction. This study highlights the use of membrane modification as an effective strategy to reduce bacterial attachment, which is the initial step of biofilm formation, rather than using antimicrobial agents that can enhance bacterial regrowth. The obtained results revealed that the filtration of pretreated, inoculated seawater using the modified PES UF membrane without the pre-chlorination step maintained the highest initial flux (3.27 ± 0.13 m(3)·m(−2)·h(−1)) in the membrane, as well as having one and a half times higher water productivity than the unmodified membrane. The highest removal of bacterial cells was achieved by the modified membrane without chlorination, in which about 12.07 × 10(4) and 8.9 × 10(4) colony-forming unit (CFU) m(−2) bacterial cells were retained on the unmodified and modified membrane surfaces, respectively, while 29.4 × 10(6) and 0.42 × 10(6) CFU mL(−1) reached the filtrate for the unmodified and modified membranes, respectively. The use of chlorine disinfectant resulted in significant bacterial regrowth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75580142020-10-22 Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity Nady, Norhan Salem, Noha Amer, Ranya El-Shazly, Ahmed Kandil, Sherif H. Hassouna, Mohamed Salah El-Din Membranes (Basel) Article In this work, the efficiency of a conventional chlorination pretreatment is compared with a novel modified low-fouling polyethersulfone (PES) ultrafiltration (UF) membrane, in terms of bacteria attachment and membrane biofouling reduction. This study highlights the use of membrane modification as an effective strategy to reduce bacterial attachment, which is the initial step of biofilm formation, rather than using antimicrobial agents that can enhance bacterial regrowth. The obtained results revealed that the filtration of pretreated, inoculated seawater using the modified PES UF membrane without the pre-chlorination step maintained the highest initial flux (3.27 ± 0.13 m(3)·m(−2)·h(−1)) in the membrane, as well as having one and a half times higher water productivity than the unmodified membrane. The highest removal of bacterial cells was achieved by the modified membrane without chlorination, in which about 12.07 × 10(4) and 8.9 × 10(4) colony-forming unit (CFU) m(−2) bacterial cells were retained on the unmodified and modified membrane surfaces, respectively, while 29.4 × 10(6) and 0.42 × 10(6) CFU mL(−1) reached the filtrate for the unmodified and modified membranes, respectively. The use of chlorine disinfectant resulted in significant bacterial regrowth. MDPI 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7558014/ /pubmed/32927801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090227 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nady, Norhan
Salem, Noha
Amer, Ranya
El-Shazly, Ahmed
Kandil, Sherif H.
Hassouna, Mohamed Salah El-Din
Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity
title Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity
title_full Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity
title_fullStr Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity
title_short Comparison between a Conventional Anti-Biofouling Compound and a Novel Modified Low-Fouling Polyethersulfone Ultrafiltration Membrane: Bacterial Anti-Attachment, Water Quality and Productivity
title_sort comparison between a conventional anti-biofouling compound and a novel modified low-fouling polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane: bacterial anti-attachment, water quality and productivity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32927801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090227
work_keys_str_mv AT nadynorhan comparisonbetweenaconventionalantibiofoulingcompoundandanovelmodifiedlowfoulingpolyethersulfoneultrafiltrationmembranebacterialantiattachmentwaterqualityandproductivity
AT salemnoha comparisonbetweenaconventionalantibiofoulingcompoundandanovelmodifiedlowfoulingpolyethersulfoneultrafiltrationmembranebacterialantiattachmentwaterqualityandproductivity
AT amerranya comparisonbetweenaconventionalantibiofoulingcompoundandanovelmodifiedlowfoulingpolyethersulfoneultrafiltrationmembranebacterialantiattachmentwaterqualityandproductivity
AT elshazlyahmed comparisonbetweenaconventionalantibiofoulingcompoundandanovelmodifiedlowfoulingpolyethersulfoneultrafiltrationmembranebacterialantiattachmentwaterqualityandproductivity
AT kandilsherifh comparisonbetweenaconventionalantibiofoulingcompoundandanovelmodifiedlowfoulingpolyethersulfoneultrafiltrationmembranebacterialantiattachmentwaterqualityandproductivity
AT hassounamohamedsalaheldin comparisonbetweenaconventionalantibiofoulingcompoundandanovelmodifiedlowfoulingpolyethersulfoneultrafiltrationmembranebacterialantiattachmentwaterqualityandproductivity