Cargando…

Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study

Electronic and mobile health (eHealth/mHealth) are rapidly growing areas in medicine and digital technologies are gaining importance. In dentistry, digitalization is also an emerging topic, whereby more and more applications are being offered. As an example, using real-time feedback, digital applica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Humm, Viviane, Wiedemeier, Daniel, Attin, Thomas, Schmidlin, Patrick, Gartenmann, Stefanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030097
_version_ 1783594556292333568
author Humm, Viviane
Wiedemeier, Daniel
Attin, Thomas
Schmidlin, Patrick
Gartenmann, Stefanie
author_facet Humm, Viviane
Wiedemeier, Daniel
Attin, Thomas
Schmidlin, Patrick
Gartenmann, Stefanie
author_sort Humm, Viviane
collection PubMed
description Electronic and mobile health (eHealth/mHealth) are rapidly growing areas in medicine and digital technologies are gaining importance. In dentistry, digitalization is also an emerging topic, whereby more and more applications are being offered. As an example, using real-time feedback, digital application software (an app) was designed to help users brush their teeth more accurately. However, there is no data on the effectiveness and haptic of such apps. Therefore, a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was designed: twenty volunteers received an electric toothbrush with an associated app to assess whether the app-assisted toothbrushing is better than without. After a short period of familiarization with the electric toothbrush, plaque index (O‘Leary et al. 1972) was recorded and subjects were assigned to the test (with app; n = 10) or the control group (no app; n = 10). At the end of the 2-week pilot study period, plaque was again assessed and participants in the test group completed a questionnaire about the app’s user-friendliness. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the test and control groups. The plaque index improved on average by 8.5% points in the test and 4.7% points in the control group. Fifty percent of the test group participants were of the opinion that they had achieved better cleaning results and would recommend the app to others, although the app contributed only marginally to increased plaque removal. However, such apps may nevertheless be helpful as motivational tools, especially when tracking and monitoring cleaning data. Therefore, more development and research on this topic is indicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75580642020-10-22 Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study Humm, Viviane Wiedemeier, Daniel Attin, Thomas Schmidlin, Patrick Gartenmann, Stefanie Dent J (Basel) Article Electronic and mobile health (eHealth/mHealth) are rapidly growing areas in medicine and digital technologies are gaining importance. In dentistry, digitalization is also an emerging topic, whereby more and more applications are being offered. As an example, using real-time feedback, digital application software (an app) was designed to help users brush their teeth more accurately. However, there is no data on the effectiveness and haptic of such apps. Therefore, a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was designed: twenty volunteers received an electric toothbrush with an associated app to assess whether the app-assisted toothbrushing is better than without. After a short period of familiarization with the electric toothbrush, plaque index (O‘Leary et al. 1972) was recorded and subjects were assigned to the test (with app; n = 10) or the control group (no app; n = 10). At the end of the 2-week pilot study period, plaque was again assessed and participants in the test group completed a questionnaire about the app’s user-friendliness. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the test and control groups. The plaque index improved on average by 8.5% points in the test and 4.7% points in the control group. Fifty percent of the test group participants were of the opinion that they had achieved better cleaning results and would recommend the app to others, although the app contributed only marginally to increased plaque removal. However, such apps may nevertheless be helpful as motivational tools, especially when tracking and monitoring cleaning data. Therefore, more development and research on this topic is indicated. MDPI 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7558064/ /pubmed/32882808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030097 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Humm, Viviane
Wiedemeier, Daniel
Attin, Thomas
Schmidlin, Patrick
Gartenmann, Stefanie
Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study
title Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study
title_full Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study
title_short Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study
title_sort treatment success and user-friendliness of an electric toothbrush app: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030097
work_keys_str_mv AT hummviviane treatmentsuccessanduserfriendlinessofanelectrictoothbrushappapilotstudy
AT wiedemeierdaniel treatmentsuccessanduserfriendlinessofanelectrictoothbrushappapilotstudy
AT attinthomas treatmentsuccessanduserfriendlinessofanelectrictoothbrushappapilotstudy
AT schmidlinpatrick treatmentsuccessanduserfriendlinessofanelectrictoothbrushappapilotstudy
AT gartenmannstefanie treatmentsuccessanduserfriendlinessofanelectrictoothbrushappapilotstudy