Cargando…

Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats

Background and Objectives: Mechanical stimulation can improve the structural properties of the fracture site and induce the differentiation of different cell types for bone regeneration. This study aimed to compare the effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) versus whole body v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Etemadi Sh, Milad, Hsieh, Nan-Chen, Movahed Mohammadi, Seyed Shahin, Momeni, Shahrooz, Razavi, Seyed Mohammad, Alizargar, Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911827
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090457
_version_ 1783594571457888256
author Etemadi Sh, Milad
Hsieh, Nan-Chen
Movahed Mohammadi, Seyed Shahin
Momeni, Shahrooz
Razavi, Seyed Mohammad
Alizargar, Javad
author_facet Etemadi Sh, Milad
Hsieh, Nan-Chen
Movahed Mohammadi, Seyed Shahin
Momeni, Shahrooz
Razavi, Seyed Mohammad
Alizargar, Javad
author_sort Etemadi Sh, Milad
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Mechanical stimulation can improve the structural properties of the fracture site and induce the differentiation of different cell types for bone regeneration. This study aimed to compare the effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) versus whole body vibration (WBV) on healing of mandibular bone defects. Materials and Methods: A mandibular defect was created in 66 rats. The rats were randomly divided into two groups of rats. Each group was subdivided randomly by three groups (n = 11) as follows: (I) control group, (II) treatment with LIPUS, and (III) treatment with WBV. The radiographic changes in bone density, the ratio of lamellar bone to the entire bone volume, the ratio of the newly formed bone to the connective tissue and inflammation grade were evaluated after 1 and 2 months. Results: LIPUS significantly increased the radiographic bone density change compared to the control group at the first and second month postoperatively (p < 0.01). WBV only significantly increased the bone density compared to the control group at the second month after the surgery (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Application of LIPUS and WBV may enhance the regeneration of mandibular bone defects in rats. Although LIPUS and WBV are effective in mandibular bone healing, the effects of LIPUS are faster and greater than WBV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75581292020-10-29 Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats Etemadi Sh, Milad Hsieh, Nan-Chen Movahed Mohammadi, Seyed Shahin Momeni, Shahrooz Razavi, Seyed Mohammad Alizargar, Javad Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Mechanical stimulation can improve the structural properties of the fracture site and induce the differentiation of different cell types for bone regeneration. This study aimed to compare the effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) versus whole body vibration (WBV) on healing of mandibular bone defects. Materials and Methods: A mandibular defect was created in 66 rats. The rats were randomly divided into two groups of rats. Each group was subdivided randomly by three groups (n = 11) as follows: (I) control group, (II) treatment with LIPUS, and (III) treatment with WBV. The radiographic changes in bone density, the ratio of lamellar bone to the entire bone volume, the ratio of the newly formed bone to the connective tissue and inflammation grade were evaluated after 1 and 2 months. Results: LIPUS significantly increased the radiographic bone density change compared to the control group at the first and second month postoperatively (p < 0.01). WBV only significantly increased the bone density compared to the control group at the second month after the surgery (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Application of LIPUS and WBV may enhance the regeneration of mandibular bone defects in rats. Although LIPUS and WBV are effective in mandibular bone healing, the effects of LIPUS are faster and greater than WBV. MDPI 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7558129/ /pubmed/32911827 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090457 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Etemadi Sh, Milad
Hsieh, Nan-Chen
Movahed Mohammadi, Seyed Shahin
Momeni, Shahrooz
Razavi, Seyed Mohammad
Alizargar, Javad
Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats
title Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats
title_full Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats
title_fullStr Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats
title_full_unstemmed Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats
title_short Histological and Radiological Evaluation of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Versus Whole Body Vibration on Healing of Mandibular Bone Defects in Rats
title_sort histological and radiological evaluation of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound versus whole body vibration on healing of mandibular bone defects in rats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911827
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090457
work_keys_str_mv AT etemadishmilad histologicalandradiologicalevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundversuswholebodyvibrationonhealingofmandibularbonedefectsinrats
AT hsiehnanchen histologicalandradiologicalevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundversuswholebodyvibrationonhealingofmandibularbonedefectsinrats
AT movahedmohammadiseyedshahin histologicalandradiologicalevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundversuswholebodyvibrationonhealingofmandibularbonedefectsinrats
AT momenishahrooz histologicalandradiologicalevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundversuswholebodyvibrationonhealingofmandibularbonedefectsinrats
AT razaviseyedmohammad histologicalandradiologicalevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundversuswholebodyvibrationonhealingofmandibularbonedefectsinrats
AT alizargarjavad histologicalandradiologicalevaluationoflowintensitypulsedultrasoundversuswholebodyvibrationonhealingofmandibularbonedefectsinrats