Cargando…

Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis

Meningitis is the most devastating form of coccidioidomycosis. A convenient, rapid diagnostic method could result in early treatment and avoid many meningitis complications. We studied cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples in patients with documented coccidioidal meningitis, and controls, with complemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, David A., Martinez, Marife, Sass, Gabriele, Pappagianis, Demosthenes, Doherty, Brian, Kutsche, Hannah, McGuire, Meredith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6030125
_version_ 1783594577474617344
author Stevens, David A.
Martinez, Marife
Sass, Gabriele
Pappagianis, Demosthenes
Doherty, Brian
Kutsche, Hannah
McGuire, Meredith
author_facet Stevens, David A.
Martinez, Marife
Sass, Gabriele
Pappagianis, Demosthenes
Doherty, Brian
Kutsche, Hannah
McGuire, Meredith
author_sort Stevens, David A.
collection PubMed
description Meningitis is the most devastating form of coccidioidomycosis. A convenient, rapid diagnostic method could result in early treatment and avoid many meningitis complications. We studied cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples in patients with documented coccidioidal meningitis, and controls, with complement fixation (CF), immunodiffusion (ID) (the “classical” assays), lateral flow assays (LFA; one-strip and two-strip), and two enzyme immunoassays (EIA). The two-strip LFA and EIAs not only enabled separate testing for IgG and IgM antibodies separately, but also could aggregate results for each method. CF with ID or the aggregate use of IgG and IgM tests were considered optimal test uses. LFAs and EIAs were evaluated at 1:21 and 1:441 dilutions of specimens. All assays were compared to true patient status. With 49 patient specimens and 40 controls, this is the largest comparative study of CSF coccidioidal diagnostics. Sensitivity of these tests ranged from 71–95% and specificity 90–100%. IgM assays were less sensitive. Assays at 1:441 were similarly specific but less sensitive, suggesting that serial dilutions of samples could result in assays yielding titers. Agreement of positive results on cases was 87–100%. When kits are available, hospital laboratories in endemic areas can perform testing. LFA assays do not require a laboratory, are simple to use, and give rapid results, potentially even at the bedside.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75581552020-10-29 Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis Stevens, David A. Martinez, Marife Sass, Gabriele Pappagianis, Demosthenes Doherty, Brian Kutsche, Hannah McGuire, Meredith J Fungi (Basel) Article Meningitis is the most devastating form of coccidioidomycosis. A convenient, rapid diagnostic method could result in early treatment and avoid many meningitis complications. We studied cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples in patients with documented coccidioidal meningitis, and controls, with complement fixation (CF), immunodiffusion (ID) (the “classical” assays), lateral flow assays (LFA; one-strip and two-strip), and two enzyme immunoassays (EIA). The two-strip LFA and EIAs not only enabled separate testing for IgG and IgM antibodies separately, but also could aggregate results for each method. CF with ID or the aggregate use of IgG and IgM tests were considered optimal test uses. LFAs and EIAs were evaluated at 1:21 and 1:441 dilutions of specimens. All assays were compared to true patient status. With 49 patient specimens and 40 controls, this is the largest comparative study of CSF coccidioidal diagnostics. Sensitivity of these tests ranged from 71–95% and specificity 90–100%. IgM assays were less sensitive. Assays at 1:441 were similarly specific but less sensitive, suggesting that serial dilutions of samples could result in assays yielding titers. Agreement of positive results on cases was 87–100%. When kits are available, hospital laboratories in endemic areas can perform testing. LFA assays do not require a laboratory, are simple to use, and give rapid results, potentially even at the bedside. MDPI 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7558155/ /pubmed/32759879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6030125 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stevens, David A.
Martinez, Marife
Sass, Gabriele
Pappagianis, Demosthenes
Doherty, Brian
Kutsche, Hannah
McGuire, Meredith
Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis
title Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis
title_full Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis
title_short Comparative Study of Newer and Established Methods of Diagnosing Coccidioidal Meningitis
title_sort comparative study of newer and established methods of diagnosing coccidioidal meningitis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof6030125
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensdavida comparativestudyofnewerandestablishedmethodsofdiagnosingcoccidioidalmeningitis
AT martinezmarife comparativestudyofnewerandestablishedmethodsofdiagnosingcoccidioidalmeningitis
AT sassgabriele comparativestudyofnewerandestablishedmethodsofdiagnosingcoccidioidalmeningitis
AT pappagianisdemosthenes comparativestudyofnewerandestablishedmethodsofdiagnosingcoccidioidalmeningitis
AT dohertybrian comparativestudyofnewerandestablishedmethodsofdiagnosingcoccidioidalmeningitis
AT kutschehannah comparativestudyofnewerandestablishedmethodsofdiagnosingcoccidioidalmeningitis
AT mcguiremeredith comparativestudyofnewerandestablishedmethodsofdiagnosingcoccidioidalmeningitis