Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies

Rapidly developing digital dental technologies have substantially simplified the documentation of plaster dental models. The large variety of available scanners with varying degrees of accuracy and cost, however, makes the purchase decision difficult. This study assessed the digitization accuracy of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emara, Aalaa, Sharma, Neha, Halbeisen, Florian S., Msallem, Bilal, Thieringer, Florian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32748890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030079
_version_ 1783594612599816192
author Emara, Aalaa
Sharma, Neha
Halbeisen, Florian S.
Msallem, Bilal
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_facet Emara, Aalaa
Sharma, Neha
Halbeisen, Florian S.
Msallem, Bilal
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_sort Emara, Aalaa
collection PubMed
description Rapidly developing digital dental technologies have substantially simplified the documentation of plaster dental models. The large variety of available scanners with varying degrees of accuracy and cost, however, makes the purchase decision difficult. This study assessed the digitization accuracy of a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and an intraoral scanner (IOS), as compared to a desktop optical scanner (OS). Ten plaster dental models were digitized three times (n = 30) with each scanner. The generated STL files were cross-compared, and the RMS values were calculated. Conclusions were drawn about the accuracy with respect to precision and trueness levels. The precision of the CBCT scanner was similar to the desktop OS reference, which both had a median deviation of 0.04 mm. The IOS had statistically significantly higher deviation compared to the reference OS, with a median deviation of 0.18 mm. The trueness values of the CBCT was also better than that of IOS—median differences of 0.14 and 0.17 mm, respectively. We conclude that the tested CBCT scanner is a highly accurate and user-friendly scanner for model digitization, and therefore a valuable alternative to the OS. The tested IOS was generally of lower accuracy, but it can still be used for plaster dental model digitization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75583082020-10-22 Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies Emara, Aalaa Sharma, Neha Halbeisen, Florian S. Msallem, Bilal Thieringer, Florian M. Dent J (Basel) Article Rapidly developing digital dental technologies have substantially simplified the documentation of plaster dental models. The large variety of available scanners with varying degrees of accuracy and cost, however, makes the purchase decision difficult. This study assessed the digitization accuracy of a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and an intraoral scanner (IOS), as compared to a desktop optical scanner (OS). Ten plaster dental models were digitized three times (n = 30) with each scanner. The generated STL files were cross-compared, and the RMS values were calculated. Conclusions were drawn about the accuracy with respect to precision and trueness levels. The precision of the CBCT scanner was similar to the desktop OS reference, which both had a median deviation of 0.04 mm. The IOS had statistically significantly higher deviation compared to the reference OS, with a median deviation of 0.18 mm. The trueness values of the CBCT was also better than that of IOS—median differences of 0.14 and 0.17 mm, respectively. We conclude that the tested CBCT scanner is a highly accurate and user-friendly scanner for model digitization, and therefore a valuable alternative to the OS. The tested IOS was generally of lower accuracy, but it can still be used for plaster dental model digitization. MDPI 2020-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7558308/ /pubmed/32748890 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030079 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Emara, Aalaa
Sharma, Neha
Halbeisen, Florian S.
Msallem, Bilal
Thieringer, Florian M.
Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies
title Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies
title_sort comparative evaluation of digitization of diagnostic dental cast (plaster) models using different scanning technologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32748890
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030079
work_keys_str_mv AT emaraaalaa comparativeevaluationofdigitizationofdiagnosticdentalcastplastermodelsusingdifferentscanningtechnologies
AT sharmaneha comparativeevaluationofdigitizationofdiagnosticdentalcastplastermodelsusingdifferentscanningtechnologies
AT halbeisenflorians comparativeevaluationofdigitizationofdiagnosticdentalcastplastermodelsusingdifferentscanningtechnologies
AT msallembilal comparativeevaluationofdigitizationofdiagnosticdentalcastplastermodelsusingdifferentscanningtechnologies
AT thieringerflorianm comparativeevaluationofdigitizationofdiagnosticdentalcastplastermodelsusingdifferentscanningtechnologies