Cargando…

Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics

Aim: To evaluate the reliability of linear and angular measurements taken using different software programs in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: A sample of four software programs from different manufacturers, namely MicroDicom viewer, Photoshop(®) CS3, AutoCAD(®), and Image-Pro(®), were used for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radwan, Eman Saad, Scribante, Andrea, Sfondrini, Maria Francesca, Montasser, Mona A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32756303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030081
_version_ 1783594632344502272
author Radwan, Eman Saad
Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Montasser, Mona A
author_facet Radwan, Eman Saad
Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Montasser, Mona A
author_sort Radwan, Eman Saad
collection PubMed
description Aim: To evaluate the reliability of linear and angular measurements taken using different software programs in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: A sample of four software programs from different manufacturers, namely MicroDicom viewer, Photoshop(®) CS3, AutoCAD(®), and Image-Pro(®), were used for measuring the geometric features of four types of miniscrews from different manufacturers. Each miniscrew type presented a group: Group I, Tomas(®) (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany); Group II, HUBIT(®) (HUBIT, Gyeonggi-do, Korea); Group III, AbsoAnchor(®) (Dentos, Daegu, Korea); and Group IV, Creative (Creative, Zhejiang, China). Measurements of apical face angle, thread angle, lead angle, flank, pitch depth, and width were taken on 45 × magnification scanning electron microscope images of the shafts of the miniscrews. One assessor measured the seven geometric features for the four types of miniscrews using the four software programs twice in two sessions separated by a three week interval. Results: Pairwise comparisons, for each of the four miniscrew groups, showed that the only common result observed was the significant difference (p < 0.001) between measurements of flank taken by the four software programs. When measurements of the four types of miniscrews were pooled into one group, a high degree of intra-rater reliability (ICC range from 0.9 to 1.0) for all the seven geometric features was found with all the four software programs. The paired t-test showed insignificant difference (at p ≤ 0.05) between the first and second measurements, except for a few measurements including pitch width measured by Image-Pro(®) (p = 0.012), MicroDicom (p = 0.023), and Photoshop(®) (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Results did not give absolute superiority to one software program over the others and suggested an assessor effect. Assessor estimates could have been affected, among other factors, by the design of the miniscrews and the technical features of the software programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75583952020-10-22 Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics Radwan, Eman Saad Scribante, Andrea Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Montasser, Mona A Dent J (Basel) Article Aim: To evaluate the reliability of linear and angular measurements taken using different software programs in orthodontics. Materials and Methods: A sample of four software programs from different manufacturers, namely MicroDicom viewer, Photoshop(®) CS3, AutoCAD(®), and Image-Pro(®), were used for measuring the geometric features of four types of miniscrews from different manufacturers. Each miniscrew type presented a group: Group I, Tomas(®) (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany); Group II, HUBIT(®) (HUBIT, Gyeonggi-do, Korea); Group III, AbsoAnchor(®) (Dentos, Daegu, Korea); and Group IV, Creative (Creative, Zhejiang, China). Measurements of apical face angle, thread angle, lead angle, flank, pitch depth, and width were taken on 45 × magnification scanning electron microscope images of the shafts of the miniscrews. One assessor measured the seven geometric features for the four types of miniscrews using the four software programs twice in two sessions separated by a three week interval. Results: Pairwise comparisons, for each of the four miniscrew groups, showed that the only common result observed was the significant difference (p < 0.001) between measurements of flank taken by the four software programs. When measurements of the four types of miniscrews were pooled into one group, a high degree of intra-rater reliability (ICC range from 0.9 to 1.0) for all the seven geometric features was found with all the four software programs. The paired t-test showed insignificant difference (at p ≤ 0.05) between the first and second measurements, except for a few measurements including pitch width measured by Image-Pro(®) (p = 0.012), MicroDicom (p = 0.023), and Photoshop(®) (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Results did not give absolute superiority to one software program over the others and suggested an assessor effect. Assessor estimates could have been affected, among other factors, by the design of the miniscrews and the technical features of the software programs. MDPI 2020-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7558395/ /pubmed/32756303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030081 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Radwan, Eman Saad
Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Montasser, Mona A
Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics
title Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics
title_full Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics
title_fullStr Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics
title_full_unstemmed Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics
title_short Imaging Software Programs for Reliable Mathematical Measurements in Orthodontics
title_sort imaging software programs for reliable mathematical measurements in orthodontics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32756303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030081
work_keys_str_mv AT radwanemansaad imagingsoftwareprogramsforreliablemathematicalmeasurementsinorthodontics
AT scribanteandrea imagingsoftwareprogramsforreliablemathematicalmeasurementsinorthodontics
AT sfondrinimariafrancesca imagingsoftwareprogramsforreliablemathematicalmeasurementsinorthodontics
AT montassermonaa imagingsoftwareprogramsforreliablemathematicalmeasurementsinorthodontics