Cargando…

The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy

In this work, a near β-type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn alloy was hot-rolled at the temperature of 800–880 °C with a thickness reduction of 87.5% and then heat-treated with the strategy of 880 °C/1 h/air cooling (AC) + 650 °C/3 h/AC. The microstructure difference between the hot-rolled and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Xinjie, Fan, Qunbo, Wang, Duoduo, Gong, Haichao, Yu, Hong, Yuan, Jingjiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32927684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13184006
_version_ 1783594646408003584
author Zhu, Xinjie
Fan, Qunbo
Wang, Duoduo
Gong, Haichao
Yu, Hong
Yuan, Jingjiu
author_facet Zhu, Xinjie
Fan, Qunbo
Wang, Duoduo
Gong, Haichao
Yu, Hong
Yuan, Jingjiu
author_sort Zhu, Xinjie
collection PubMed
description In this work, a near β-type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn alloy was hot-rolled at the temperature of 800–880 °C with a thickness reduction of 87.5% and then heat-treated with the strategy of 880 °C/1 h/air cooling (AC) + 650 °C/3 h/AC. The microstructure difference between the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloys and its influence on the ballistic impact behavior of the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloys were analyzed. The microstructural investigation revealed that the average size of the acicular secondary α phase (α(s)) dropped from 75 to 42 nm, and the corresponding amount of this phase increased significantly after heat treatment. In addition, the dislocation density of the α and β phases decreased from 0.3340 × 10(15)/m(2) and 4.6746 × 10(15)/m(2) for the hot-rolled titanium alloy plate to 0.2806 × 10(15)/m(2) and 1.8050 × 10(15)/m(2) for the heat-treated one, respectively. The high strength of the heat-treated titanium alloy was maintained, owing to the positive contribution of the acicular secondary α phase. Furthermore, the critical fracture strain increased sharply from 19.9% for the hot-rolled titanium alloy plate to 23.1% for the heat-treated one, thereby overcoming (to some extent) the constraint of the strength–ductility trade-off. This is mainly attributed to the fact that the dislocation density and the difference between the dislocation densities of the α and β phases decreased substantially, and deformation localization was effectively suppressed after heat treatment. Damage to the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloy plates after the penetration of a 7.62 mm ordinary steel core projectile at a distance of 100 m was assessed via industrial computer tomography and microstructure observation. The results revealed that a large crack (volume: 2.55 mm(3)) occurred on the rear face and propagated toward the interior of the hot-rolled titanium alloy plate. The crack tip was connected to a long adiabatic shear band with a depth of 3 mm along the thickness direction. However, good integrity of the heat-treated titanium alloy plate was maintained, owing to its excellent deformation capability. Ultimately, the failure mechanism of the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloy plates was revealed by determining the crack-forming reasons in these materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75584752020-10-26 The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy Zhu, Xinjie Fan, Qunbo Wang, Duoduo Gong, Haichao Yu, Hong Yuan, Jingjiu Materials (Basel) Article In this work, a near β-type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn alloy was hot-rolled at the temperature of 800–880 °C with a thickness reduction of 87.5% and then heat-treated with the strategy of 880 °C/1 h/air cooling (AC) + 650 °C/3 h/AC. The microstructure difference between the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloys and its influence on the ballistic impact behavior of the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloys were analyzed. The microstructural investigation revealed that the average size of the acicular secondary α phase (α(s)) dropped from 75 to 42 nm, and the corresponding amount of this phase increased significantly after heat treatment. In addition, the dislocation density of the α and β phases decreased from 0.3340 × 10(15)/m(2) and 4.6746 × 10(15)/m(2) for the hot-rolled titanium alloy plate to 0.2806 × 10(15)/m(2) and 1.8050 × 10(15)/m(2) for the heat-treated one, respectively. The high strength of the heat-treated titanium alloy was maintained, owing to the positive contribution of the acicular secondary α phase. Furthermore, the critical fracture strain increased sharply from 19.9% for the hot-rolled titanium alloy plate to 23.1% for the heat-treated one, thereby overcoming (to some extent) the constraint of the strength–ductility trade-off. This is mainly attributed to the fact that the dislocation density and the difference between the dislocation densities of the α and β phases decreased substantially, and deformation localization was effectively suppressed after heat treatment. Damage to the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloy plates after the penetration of a 7.62 mm ordinary steel core projectile at a distance of 100 m was assessed via industrial computer tomography and microstructure observation. The results revealed that a large crack (volume: 2.55 mm(3)) occurred on the rear face and propagated toward the interior of the hot-rolled titanium alloy plate. The crack tip was connected to a long adiabatic shear band with a depth of 3 mm along the thickness direction. However, good integrity of the heat-treated titanium alloy plate was maintained, owing to its excellent deformation capability. Ultimately, the failure mechanism of the hot-rolled and heat-treated titanium alloy plates was revealed by determining the crack-forming reasons in these materials. MDPI 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7558475/ /pubmed/32927684 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13184006 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhu, Xinjie
Fan, Qunbo
Wang, Duoduo
Gong, Haichao
Yu, Hong
Yuan, Jingjiu
The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy
title The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy
title_full The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy
title_fullStr The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy
title_full_unstemmed The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy
title_short The Microstructural Difference and Its Influence on the Ballistic Impact Behavior of a Near β-Type Ti5.1Al2.5Cr0.5Fe4.5Mo1.1Sn1.8Zr2.9Zn Titanium Alloy
title_sort microstructural difference and its influence on the ballistic impact behavior of a near β-type ti5.1al2.5cr0.5fe4.5mo1.1sn1.8zr2.9zn titanium alloy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32927684
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13184006
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuxinjie themicrostructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT fanqunbo themicrostructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT wangduoduo themicrostructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT gonghaichao themicrostructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT yuhong themicrostructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT yuanjingjiu themicrostructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT zhuxinjie microstructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT fanqunbo microstructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT wangduoduo microstructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT gonghaichao microstructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT yuhong microstructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy
AT yuanjingjiu microstructuraldifferenceanditsinfluenceontheballisticimpactbehaviorofanearbtypeti51al25cr05fe45mo11sn18zr29zntitaniumalloy