Cargando…

Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study

Reducing sedentary behavior in the workplace has become an important public health priority; however, some employers have expressed concerns regarding the potential for reduced productivity if employees are not seated while at work. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenkranz, Sara K., Mailey, Emily L., Umansky, Emily, Rosenkranz, Richard R., Ablah, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911740
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186535
_version_ 1783594670862893056
author Rosenkranz, Sara K.
Mailey, Emily L.
Umansky, Emily
Rosenkranz, Richard R.
Ablah, Elizabeth
author_facet Rosenkranz, Sara K.
Mailey, Emily L.
Umansky, Emily
Rosenkranz, Richard R.
Ablah, Elizabeth
author_sort Rosenkranz, Sara K.
collection PubMed
description Reducing sedentary behavior in the workplace has become an important public health priority; however, some employers have expressed concerns regarding the potential for reduced productivity if employees are not seated while at work. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between workplace sedentary behavior (sitting time) and work productivity among full-time office-based employees, and further to investigate other potential factors associated with productivity. A 19-item online self-report survey was completed by 2068 government employees in Kansas. The survey assessed workplace sedentary behavior, work productivity, job satisfaction, and fatigue. Overall, office workers reported high levels of sedentary time (mean > 78%). The primary results indicated that sitting time was not significantly associated with productivity (β = 0.013, p = 0.519), but job satisfaction and fatigue were positively (β = 0.473, p < 0.001) and negatively (β = −0.047, p = 0.023) associated with productivity, respectively. Furthermore, participants with the highest level of sitting time (>91% of the time) reported lower job satisfaction and greater fatigue as compared with the lowest level of sitting time (<75% of the time). Taken together, these results offer promising support that less sitting time is associated with positive outcomes that do not seem to come at the expense of productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75585812020-10-26 Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study Rosenkranz, Sara K. Mailey, Emily L. Umansky, Emily Rosenkranz, Richard R. Ablah, Elizabeth Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Reducing sedentary behavior in the workplace has become an important public health priority; however, some employers have expressed concerns regarding the potential for reduced productivity if employees are not seated while at work. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between workplace sedentary behavior (sitting time) and work productivity among full-time office-based employees, and further to investigate other potential factors associated with productivity. A 19-item online self-report survey was completed by 2068 government employees in Kansas. The survey assessed workplace sedentary behavior, work productivity, job satisfaction, and fatigue. Overall, office workers reported high levels of sedentary time (mean > 78%). The primary results indicated that sitting time was not significantly associated with productivity (β = 0.013, p = 0.519), but job satisfaction and fatigue were positively (β = 0.473, p < 0.001) and negatively (β = −0.047, p = 0.023) associated with productivity, respectively. Furthermore, participants with the highest level of sitting time (>91% of the time) reported lower job satisfaction and greater fatigue as compared with the lowest level of sitting time (<75% of the time). Taken together, these results offer promising support that less sitting time is associated with positive outcomes that do not seem to come at the expense of productivity. MDPI 2020-09-08 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7558581/ /pubmed/32911740 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186535 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rosenkranz, Sara K.
Mailey, Emily L.
Umansky, Emily
Rosenkranz, Richard R.
Ablah, Elizabeth
Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Workplace Sedentary Behavior and Productivity: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort workplace sedentary behavior and productivity: a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32911740
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186535
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenkranzsarak workplacesedentarybehaviorandproductivityacrosssectionalstudy
AT maileyemilyl workplacesedentarybehaviorandproductivityacrosssectionalstudy
AT umanskyemily workplacesedentarybehaviorandproductivityacrosssectionalstudy
AT rosenkranzrichardr workplacesedentarybehaviorandproductivityacrosssectionalstudy
AT ablahelizabeth workplacesedentarybehaviorandproductivityacrosssectionalstudy