Cargando…

In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation

Background and Objectives: There is still considerable controversy regarding the possibility of submitting replanted teeth to orthodontic movement (OM). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the tissue response after orthodontic movement on replanted teeth. Materials and Methods: Sixty Wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque, Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana, Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso, Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino, Montemezzi, Pietro, Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros, Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e, Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090421
_version_ 1783594740518748160
author Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque
Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso
Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino
Montemezzi, Pietro
Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros
Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e
Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera
author_facet Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque
Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso
Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino
Montemezzi, Pietro
Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros
Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e
Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera
author_sort Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: There is still considerable controversy regarding the possibility of submitting replanted teeth to orthodontic movement (OM). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the tissue response after orthodontic movement on replanted teeth. Materials and Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15): G1, replantation without OM after 30 days; G2, replantation with OM after 30 days; G3, replantation without OM after 60 days, and G4, replantation with OM after 60 days. The maxillary left central incisors were extracted and the teeth were stored in milk media. After 30 min, the teeth were replanted and fixed with non-rigid immobilization. All specimens were observed after 30 and 60 days of replantation and then subdivided into two subgroups (with OM or without OM). The animals were euthanized after seven days of the OM started, and the maxillary bone blocks were processed for histological evaluation. Results: The histological results showed periodontal ligament repair in both periods studied without OM; however, ankylosis and root resorption was seen in all orthodontically moved teeth. Conclusions: The orthodontic movement did not favor tissue response in all replanted teeth, regardless of the experimental periods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75589102020-10-26 In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: There is still considerable controversy regarding the possibility of submitting replanted teeth to orthodontic movement (OM). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the tissue response after orthodontic movement on replanted teeth. Materials and Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15): G1, replantation without OM after 30 days; G2, replantation with OM after 30 days; G3, replantation without OM after 60 days, and G4, replantation with OM after 60 days. The maxillary left central incisors were extracted and the teeth were stored in milk media. After 30 min, the teeth were replanted and fixed with non-rigid immobilization. All specimens were observed after 30 and 60 days of replantation and then subdivided into two subgroups (with OM or without OM). The animals were euthanized after seven days of the OM started, and the maxillary bone blocks were processed for histological evaluation. Results: The histological results showed periodontal ligament repair in both periods studied without OM; however, ankylosis and root resorption was seen in all orthodontically moved teeth. Conclusions: The orthodontic movement did not favor tissue response in all replanted teeth, regardless of the experimental periods. MDPI 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7558910/ /pubmed/32825215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090421 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque
Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso
Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino
Montemezzi, Pietro
Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros
Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e
Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera
In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
title In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
title_full In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
title_fullStr In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
title_short In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
title_sort in vivo biological evaluation of orthodontically moved incisors after replantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090421
work_keys_str_mv AT calasansmaiajosedealbuquerque invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation
AT calasansmaiamonicadiuana invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation
AT stuanimariabernadetesasso invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation
AT alvesadrianaterezinhanevesnovellino invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation
AT montemezzipietro invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation
AT mouraocarlosfernandodealmeidabarros invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation
AT calnetojuliopedrae invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation
AT ruellasantoniocarlosdeoliviera invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation