Cargando…
In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
Background and Objectives: There is still considerable controversy regarding the possibility of submitting replanted teeth to orthodontic movement (OM). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the tissue response after orthodontic movement on replanted teeth. Materials and Methods: Sixty Wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090421 |
_version_ | 1783594740518748160 |
---|---|
author | Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera |
author_facet | Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera |
author_sort | Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: There is still considerable controversy regarding the possibility of submitting replanted teeth to orthodontic movement (OM). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the tissue response after orthodontic movement on replanted teeth. Materials and Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15): G1, replantation without OM after 30 days; G2, replantation with OM after 30 days; G3, replantation without OM after 60 days, and G4, replantation with OM after 60 days. The maxillary left central incisors were extracted and the teeth were stored in milk media. After 30 min, the teeth were replanted and fixed with non-rigid immobilization. All specimens were observed after 30 and 60 days of replantation and then subdivided into two subgroups (with OM or without OM). The animals were euthanized after seven days of the OM started, and the maxillary bone blocks were processed for histological evaluation. Results: The histological results showed periodontal ligament repair in both periods studied without OM; however, ankylosis and root resorption was seen in all orthodontically moved teeth. Conclusions: The orthodontic movement did not favor tissue response in all replanted teeth, regardless of the experimental periods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7558910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75589102020-10-26 In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: There is still considerable controversy regarding the possibility of submitting replanted teeth to orthodontic movement (OM). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the tissue response after orthodontic movement on replanted teeth. Materials and Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 15): G1, replantation without OM after 30 days; G2, replantation with OM after 30 days; G3, replantation without OM after 60 days, and G4, replantation with OM after 60 days. The maxillary left central incisors were extracted and the teeth were stored in milk media. After 30 min, the teeth were replanted and fixed with non-rigid immobilization. All specimens were observed after 30 and 60 days of replantation and then subdivided into two subgroups (with OM or without OM). The animals were euthanized after seven days of the OM started, and the maxillary bone blocks were processed for histological evaluation. Results: The histological results showed periodontal ligament repair in both periods studied without OM; however, ankylosis and root resorption was seen in all orthodontically moved teeth. Conclusions: The orthodontic movement did not favor tissue response in all replanted teeth, regardless of the experimental periods. MDPI 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7558910/ /pubmed/32825215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090421 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Calasans-Maia, Jose de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana Stuani, Maria Bernadete Sasso Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Montemezzi, Pietro Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Cal-Neto, Julio Pedra e Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliviera In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation |
title | In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation |
title_full | In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation |
title_fullStr | In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation |
title_short | In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation |
title_sort | in vivo biological evaluation of orthodontically moved incisors after replantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32825215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calasansmaiajosedealbuquerque invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation AT calasansmaiamonicadiuana invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation AT stuanimariabernadetesasso invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation AT alvesadrianaterezinhanevesnovellino invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation AT montemezzipietro invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation AT mouraocarlosfernandodealmeidabarros invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation AT calnetojuliopedrae invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation AT ruellasantoniocarlosdeoliviera invivobiologicalevaluationoforthodonticallymovedincisorsafterreplantation |