Cargando…

Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health

This article presents the research from the first phase of our study on blood-borne risk management, wherein we solicited epidemiologists’ and healthcare practitioners’ expert opinions on a blood-borne infection risk assessment in Poland. Forty-two experts were recommended by epidemiology consultant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gębska Kuczerowska, Anita, Błoński, Artur, Kuczerowska, Joanna, Gajda, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932579
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186650
_version_ 1783594758924402688
author Gębska Kuczerowska, Anita
Błoński, Artur
Kuczerowska, Joanna
Gajda, Robert
author_facet Gębska Kuczerowska, Anita
Błoński, Artur
Kuczerowska, Joanna
Gajda, Robert
author_sort Gębska Kuczerowska, Anita
collection PubMed
description This article presents the research from the first phase of our study on blood-borne risk management, wherein we solicited epidemiologists’ and healthcare practitioners’ expert opinions on a blood-borne infection risk assessment in Poland. Forty-two experts were recommended by epidemiology consultants and recruited from all districts in Poland. We used the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) method in the evaluation. Experts’ opinions showed that there is room for improvement in the prevention of blood-borne infections. Commonly reported weaknesses in the risk assessment included gaps in knowledge and inappropriate procedures, which are largely caused by financial constraints and practitioners’ lack of awareness of developments in their trade. Strengths included legal regulations for medical services and procedures, surveillance, and increasing awareness on the part of medical staff. When paired with the existing statistical data, these results provide a comprehensive view of the problem of blood-borne infections in Poland. The analysis supported the development of a strategy proposal to prevent blood-borne infections and enhance existing risk assessment procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7558990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75589902020-10-26 Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health Gębska Kuczerowska, Anita Błoński, Artur Kuczerowska, Joanna Gajda, Robert Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This article presents the research from the first phase of our study on blood-borne risk management, wherein we solicited epidemiologists’ and healthcare practitioners’ expert opinions on a blood-borne infection risk assessment in Poland. Forty-two experts were recommended by epidemiology consultants and recruited from all districts in Poland. We used the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) method in the evaluation. Experts’ opinions showed that there is room for improvement in the prevention of blood-borne infections. Commonly reported weaknesses in the risk assessment included gaps in knowledge and inappropriate procedures, which are largely caused by financial constraints and practitioners’ lack of awareness of developments in their trade. Strengths included legal regulations for medical services and procedures, surveillance, and increasing awareness on the part of medical staff. When paired with the existing statistical data, these results provide a comprehensive view of the problem of blood-borne infections in Poland. The analysis supported the development of a strategy proposal to prevent blood-borne infections and enhance existing risk assessment procedures. MDPI 2020-09-12 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7558990/ /pubmed/32932579 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186650 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gębska Kuczerowska, Anita
Błoński, Artur
Kuczerowska, Joanna
Gajda, Robert
Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health
title Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health
title_full Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health
title_fullStr Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health
title_full_unstemmed Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health
title_short Strengths and Weaknesses in the Risk Management of Blood-Borne Infections: Qualitative Research in Public Health
title_sort strengths and weaknesses in the risk management of blood-borne infections: qualitative research in public health
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7558990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932579
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186650
work_keys_str_mv AT gebskakuczerowskaanita strengthsandweaknessesintheriskmanagementofbloodborneinfectionsqualitativeresearchinpublichealth
AT błonskiartur strengthsandweaknessesintheriskmanagementofbloodborneinfectionsqualitativeresearchinpublichealth
AT kuczerowskajoanna strengthsandweaknessesintheriskmanagementofbloodborneinfectionsqualitativeresearchinpublichealth
AT gajdarobert strengthsandweaknessesintheriskmanagementofbloodborneinfectionsqualitativeresearchinpublichealth