Cargando…
Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of the evaluation of the Scottish Quality and Safety Fellowship (SQSF)—a 10-month, lead-level international educational programme established in 2008 with the overarching aim of developing clinicians with advanced quality improvement knowledge, technical ab...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33055177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000978 |
_version_ | 1783594770734514176 |
---|---|
author | Toma, Madalina Blamey, Avril Mahal, Dawn Gray, Nicola M Allison, Laura Thakore, Shobhan Bowie, Paul |
author_facet | Toma, Madalina Blamey, Avril Mahal, Dawn Gray, Nicola M Allison, Laura Thakore, Shobhan Bowie, Paul |
author_sort | Toma, Madalina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of the evaluation of the Scottish Quality and Safety Fellowship (SQSF)—a 10-month, lead-level international educational programme established in 2008 with the overarching aim of developing clinicians with advanced quality improvement knowledge, technical ability and essential leadership skills. The evaluation explores four levels of educational and practice outcomes associated with (1) the reaction of fellows to SQSF participation, (2) learning gained, (3) subsequent behaviour changes and (4) the overall impact on national and international level capability and capacity building. METHODS: A theory-informed multi-method design was applied using (1) a search and review of the SQSF organisational database to tabulate personal, professional and demographic characteristics; (2) semi-structured telephone interviews with 16 participants using purposive and self-selected sampling; and (3) a cross-sectional online evaluation survey across all 10 cohorts involving 222 fellows RESULTS: SQSF was positively perceived as a high-quality learning experience containing a well-balanced mix of theory and practice, with a majority of respondents reporting career changing benefits. Most participants reported improved social, behavioural and emotional skills, knowledge and attitudes and, with sustained support of their host organisations, were able to apply and share learning in their workplace. The impact of the SQSF on a wider national and international level capability and capacity was both mediated and moderated by a wide range of interrelated contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-method evaluation demonstrates that SQSF has achieved significant positive outcomes for the great majority of participants. Some tentative recommendations are provided with the aim of further enhancing fellowship content, delivery, transfer and future evaluations of wider impacts at regional, national and international health system levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7559044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75590442020-10-19 Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement Toma, Madalina Blamey, Avril Mahal, Dawn Gray, Nicola M Allison, Laura Thakore, Shobhan Bowie, Paul BMJ Open Qual Quality Education Report BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of the evaluation of the Scottish Quality and Safety Fellowship (SQSF)—a 10-month, lead-level international educational programme established in 2008 with the overarching aim of developing clinicians with advanced quality improvement knowledge, technical ability and essential leadership skills. The evaluation explores four levels of educational and practice outcomes associated with (1) the reaction of fellows to SQSF participation, (2) learning gained, (3) subsequent behaviour changes and (4) the overall impact on national and international level capability and capacity building. METHODS: A theory-informed multi-method design was applied using (1) a search and review of the SQSF organisational database to tabulate personal, professional and demographic characteristics; (2) semi-structured telephone interviews with 16 participants using purposive and self-selected sampling; and (3) a cross-sectional online evaluation survey across all 10 cohorts involving 222 fellows RESULTS: SQSF was positively perceived as a high-quality learning experience containing a well-balanced mix of theory and practice, with a majority of respondents reporting career changing benefits. Most participants reported improved social, behavioural and emotional skills, knowledge and attitudes and, with sustained support of their host organisations, were able to apply and share learning in their workplace. The impact of the SQSF on a wider national and international level capability and capacity was both mediated and moderated by a wide range of interrelated contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-method evaluation demonstrates that SQSF has achieved significant positive outcomes for the great majority of participants. Some tentative recommendations are provided with the aim of further enhancing fellowship content, delivery, transfer and future evaluations of wider impacts at regional, national and international health system levels. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7559044/ /pubmed/33055177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000978 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Quality Education Report Toma, Madalina Blamey, Avril Mahal, Dawn Gray, Nicola M Allison, Laura Thakore, Shobhan Bowie, Paul Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement |
title | Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement |
title_full | Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement |
title_fullStr | Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement |
title_short | Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement |
title_sort | multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement |
topic | Quality Education Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33055177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomamadalina multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement AT blameyavril multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement AT mahaldawn multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement AT graynicolam multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement AT allisonlaura multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement AT thakoreshobhan multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement AT bowiepaul multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement |