Cargando…

Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement

BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of the evaluation of the Scottish Quality and Safety Fellowship (SQSF)—a 10-month, lead-level international educational programme established in 2008 with the overarching aim of developing clinicians with advanced quality improvement knowledge, technical ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toma, Madalina, Blamey, Avril, Mahal, Dawn, Gray, Nicola M, Allison, Laura, Thakore, Shobhan, Bowie, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33055177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000978
_version_ 1783594770734514176
author Toma, Madalina
Blamey, Avril
Mahal, Dawn
Gray, Nicola M
Allison, Laura
Thakore, Shobhan
Bowie, Paul
author_facet Toma, Madalina
Blamey, Avril
Mahal, Dawn
Gray, Nicola M
Allison, Laura
Thakore, Shobhan
Bowie, Paul
author_sort Toma, Madalina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of the evaluation of the Scottish Quality and Safety Fellowship (SQSF)—a 10-month, lead-level international educational programme established in 2008 with the overarching aim of developing clinicians with advanced quality improvement knowledge, technical ability and essential leadership skills. The evaluation explores four levels of educational and practice outcomes associated with (1) the reaction of fellows to SQSF participation, (2) learning gained, (3) subsequent behaviour changes and (4) the overall impact on national and international level capability and capacity building. METHODS: A theory-informed multi-method design was applied using (1) a search and review of the SQSF organisational database to tabulate personal, professional and demographic characteristics; (2) semi-structured telephone interviews with 16 participants using purposive and self-selected sampling; and (3) a cross-sectional online evaluation survey across all 10 cohorts involving 222 fellows RESULTS: SQSF was positively perceived as a high-quality learning experience containing a well-balanced mix of theory and practice, with a majority of respondents reporting career changing benefits. Most participants reported improved social, behavioural and emotional skills, knowledge and attitudes and, with sustained support of their host organisations, were able to apply and share learning in their workplace. The impact of the SQSF on a wider national and international level capability and capacity was both mediated and moderated by a wide range of interrelated contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-method evaluation demonstrates that SQSF has achieved significant positive outcomes for the great majority of participants. Some tentative recommendations are provided with the aim of further enhancing fellowship content, delivery, transfer and future evaluations of wider impacts at regional, national and international health system levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75590442020-10-19 Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement Toma, Madalina Blamey, Avril Mahal, Dawn Gray, Nicola M Allison, Laura Thakore, Shobhan Bowie, Paul BMJ Open Qual Quality Education Report BACKGROUND: This paper reports the results of the evaluation of the Scottish Quality and Safety Fellowship (SQSF)—a 10-month, lead-level international educational programme established in 2008 with the overarching aim of developing clinicians with advanced quality improvement knowledge, technical ability and essential leadership skills. The evaluation explores four levels of educational and practice outcomes associated with (1) the reaction of fellows to SQSF participation, (2) learning gained, (3) subsequent behaviour changes and (4) the overall impact on national and international level capability and capacity building. METHODS: A theory-informed multi-method design was applied using (1) a search and review of the SQSF organisational database to tabulate personal, professional and demographic characteristics; (2) semi-structured telephone interviews with 16 participants using purposive and self-selected sampling; and (3) a cross-sectional online evaluation survey across all 10 cohorts involving 222 fellows RESULTS: SQSF was positively perceived as a high-quality learning experience containing a well-balanced mix of theory and practice, with a majority of respondents reporting career changing benefits. Most participants reported improved social, behavioural and emotional skills, knowledge and attitudes and, with sustained support of their host organisations, were able to apply and share learning in their workplace. The impact of the SQSF on a wider national and international level capability and capacity was both mediated and moderated by a wide range of interrelated contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-method evaluation demonstrates that SQSF has achieved significant positive outcomes for the great majority of participants. Some tentative recommendations are provided with the aim of further enhancing fellowship content, delivery, transfer and future evaluations of wider impacts at regional, national and international health system levels. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7559044/ /pubmed/33055177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000978 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Education Report
Toma, Madalina
Blamey, Avril
Mahal, Dawn
Gray, Nicola M
Allison, Laura
Thakore, Shobhan
Bowie, Paul
Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
title Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
title_full Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
title_fullStr Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
title_full_unstemmed Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
title_short Multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
title_sort multi-method evaluation of a national clinical fellowship programme to build leadership capacity for quality improvement
topic Quality Education Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33055177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000978
work_keys_str_mv AT tomamadalina multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement
AT blameyavril multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement
AT mahaldawn multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement
AT graynicolam multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement
AT allisonlaura multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement
AT thakoreshobhan multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement
AT bowiepaul multimethodevaluationofanationalclinicalfellowshipprogrammetobuildleadershipcapacityforqualityimprovement