Cargando…

Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows

This study assessed the impact of a PRRSV (porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus) recombinant strain (Horsens strain) on the reproductive performance of naïve pregnant sows in the last third of gestation. Fifteen sows were included: four negative reproductive controls (NTX), five infec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Genís, Sandra, Kvisgaard, Lise K., Larsen, Lars E., Taylor, Lucas P., Calvert, Jay G., Balasch, Mònica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32967283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090772
_version_ 1783594798842642432
author Genís, Sandra
Kvisgaard, Lise K.
Larsen, Lars E.
Taylor, Lucas P.
Calvert, Jay G.
Balasch, Mònica
author_facet Genís, Sandra
Kvisgaard, Lise K.
Larsen, Lars E.
Taylor, Lucas P.
Calvert, Jay G.
Balasch, Mònica
author_sort Genís, Sandra
collection PubMed
description This study assessed the impact of a PRRSV (porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus) recombinant strain (Horsens strain) on the reproductive performance of naïve pregnant sows in the last third of gestation. Fifteen sows were included: four negative reproductive controls (NTX), five infected with a PRRSV-1 field strain (Olot/91, T01), and six infected with the recombinant PRRSV-1 strain (Horsens strain, T02). Piglets were monitored until weaning. Reproductive performance was the primary variable. In sows, viremia and nasal shedding (T01 and T02 groups), and, in piglets, viral load in blood and in lungs, as well as macroscopic lung lesions (T01 and T02 groups), were the secondary variables. The reproductive performance results were numerically different between the two challenged groups. Moreover, viral loads in blood were 1.83 × 10(6) ± 9.05 × 10(6) copies/mL at farrowing, 1.05 × 10(7) ± 2.21 × 10(7) copies/mL at weaning from piglets born from T01 animals and 1.64 × 10(3) ± 7.62 × 10(3) copies/mL at farrowing, 1.95 × 10(3) ± 1.17 × 10(4) copies/mL at weaning from piglets born from T02 sows. Overall, 68.8% of T01 piglets and 38.1% of T02 piglets presented mild lung lesions. In conclusion, the results suggest that Horsens strain is less virulent than the field strain Olot/91 under these experimental conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75591632020-10-29 Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows Genís, Sandra Kvisgaard, Lise K. Larsen, Lars E. Taylor, Lucas P. Calvert, Jay G. Balasch, Mònica Pathogens Article This study assessed the impact of a PRRSV (porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus) recombinant strain (Horsens strain) on the reproductive performance of naïve pregnant sows in the last third of gestation. Fifteen sows were included: four negative reproductive controls (NTX), five infected with a PRRSV-1 field strain (Olot/91, T01), and six infected with the recombinant PRRSV-1 strain (Horsens strain, T02). Piglets were monitored until weaning. Reproductive performance was the primary variable. In sows, viremia and nasal shedding (T01 and T02 groups), and, in piglets, viral load in blood and in lungs, as well as macroscopic lung lesions (T01 and T02 groups), were the secondary variables. The reproductive performance results were numerically different between the two challenged groups. Moreover, viral loads in blood were 1.83 × 10(6) ± 9.05 × 10(6) copies/mL at farrowing, 1.05 × 10(7) ± 2.21 × 10(7) copies/mL at weaning from piglets born from T01 animals and 1.64 × 10(3) ± 7.62 × 10(3) copies/mL at farrowing, 1.95 × 10(3) ± 1.17 × 10(4) copies/mL at weaning from piglets born from T02 sows. Overall, 68.8% of T01 piglets and 38.1% of T02 piglets presented mild lung lesions. In conclusion, the results suggest that Horsens strain is less virulent than the field strain Olot/91 under these experimental conditions. MDPI 2020-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7559163/ /pubmed/32967283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090772 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Genís, Sandra
Kvisgaard, Lise K.
Larsen, Lars E.
Taylor, Lucas P.
Calvert, Jay G.
Balasch, Mònica
Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows
title Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows
title_full Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows
title_fullStr Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows
title_short Assessment of the Impact of the Recombinant Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Horsens Strain on the Reproductive Performance in Pregnant Sows
title_sort assessment of the impact of the recombinant porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus horsens strain on the reproductive performance in pregnant sows
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32967283
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090772
work_keys_str_mv AT genissandra assessmentoftheimpactoftherecombinantporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirushorsensstrainonthereproductiveperformanceinpregnantsows
AT kvisgaardlisek assessmentoftheimpactoftherecombinantporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirushorsensstrainonthereproductiveperformanceinpregnantsows
AT larsenlarse assessmentoftheimpactoftherecombinantporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirushorsensstrainonthereproductiveperformanceinpregnantsows
AT taylorlucasp assessmentoftheimpactoftherecombinantporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirushorsensstrainonthereproductiveperformanceinpregnantsows
AT calvertjayg assessmentoftheimpactoftherecombinantporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirushorsensstrainonthereproductiveperformanceinpregnantsows
AT balaschmonica assessmentoftheimpactoftherecombinantporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirushorsensstrainonthereproductiveperformanceinpregnantsows