Cargando…

Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions

This study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elshazly, Tarek M., Bourauel, Christoph, Sherief, Dalia I., El-Korashy, Dalia I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030076
_version_ 1783594848242106368
author Elshazly, Tarek M.
Bourauel, Christoph
Sherief, Dalia I.
El-Korashy, Dalia I.
author_facet Elshazly, Tarek M.
Bourauel, Christoph
Sherief, Dalia I.
El-Korashy, Dalia I.
author_sort Elshazly, Tarek M.
collection PubMed
description This study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and polymerization shrinkage, cylindrical specimens with different thicknesses were prepared. The DoC was attributed to the bottom/top ratios of Vickers microhardness numbers. For polymerization shrinkage, each specimen was firstly scanned using micro-computed tomography (µCT) then cured for 20 s, then for 10 s, and then for 10 s, and they were rescanned between each curing time. Data were processed using the Mimics software. For marginal leakage, standardized 5 mm cavities were prepared in 90 molars. After etching and bonding, materials were packed according to groups: FB-bulk, FB-incremental, and FS-incremental, which were cured for 20, 30, and 40 s, respectively. After thermo-cycling, teeth were stored in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h and then sectioned and observed for dye penetration. The results showed insignificant differences in the shrinkage and leakage between the different packing techniques and curing times of both materials. In conclusion, the introduction of a novel matrix into resin composite composition enabled bulk-filling in one layer up to 5 mm deep while keeping a tolerable polymerization shrinkage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75593802020-10-26 Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions Elshazly, Tarek M. Bourauel, Christoph Sherief, Dalia I. El-Korashy, Dalia I. Dent J (Basel) Article This study compared two resin composites with similar filler systems and different matrix compositions. The depth of cure (DoC), polymerization shrinkage, and marginal leakage were evaluated. A Filtek Bulk Fill resin composite (FB) and a Filtek Supreme resin composite (FS) were used. For the DoC and polymerization shrinkage, cylindrical specimens with different thicknesses were prepared. The DoC was attributed to the bottom/top ratios of Vickers microhardness numbers. For polymerization shrinkage, each specimen was firstly scanned using micro-computed tomography (µCT) then cured for 20 s, then for 10 s, and then for 10 s, and they were rescanned between each curing time. Data were processed using the Mimics software. For marginal leakage, standardized 5 mm cavities were prepared in 90 molars. After etching and bonding, materials were packed according to groups: FB-bulk, FB-incremental, and FS-incremental, which were cured for 20, 30, and 40 s, respectively. After thermo-cycling, teeth were stored in 1% methylene blue dye for 24 h and then sectioned and observed for dye penetration. The results showed insignificant differences in the shrinkage and leakage between the different packing techniques and curing times of both materials. In conclusion, the introduction of a novel matrix into resin composite composition enabled bulk-filling in one layer up to 5 mm deep while keeping a tolerable polymerization shrinkage. MDPI 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7559380/ /pubmed/32709056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030076 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Elshazly, Tarek M.
Bourauel, Christoph
Sherief, Dalia I.
El-Korashy, Dalia I.
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_full Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_fullStr Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_short Evaluation of Two Resin Composites Having Different Matrix Compositions
title_sort evaluation of two resin composites having different matrix compositions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32709056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030076
work_keys_str_mv AT elshazlytarekm evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions
AT bourauelchristoph evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions
AT sheriefdaliai evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions
AT elkorashydaliai evaluationoftworesincompositeshavingdifferentmatrixcompositions