Cargando…

Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing

Reaction time testing is widely used in online computerized concussion assessments, and most concussion studies utilizing the metric have demonstrated varying degrees of difference between concussed and non-concussed individuals. The problem with most of these online concussion assessments is that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holden, Jameson, Francisco, Eric, Tommerdahl, Anna, Lensch, Rachel, Kirsch, Bryan, Zai, Laila, Pearce, Alan J., Favorov, Oleg V., Dennis, Robert G., Tommerdahl, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132870
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.509091
_version_ 1783594851965599744
author Holden, Jameson
Francisco, Eric
Tommerdahl, Anna
Lensch, Rachel
Kirsch, Bryan
Zai, Laila
Pearce, Alan J.
Favorov, Oleg V.
Dennis, Robert G.
Tommerdahl, Mark
author_facet Holden, Jameson
Francisco, Eric
Tommerdahl, Anna
Lensch, Rachel
Kirsch, Bryan
Zai, Laila
Pearce, Alan J.
Favorov, Oleg V.
Dennis, Robert G.
Tommerdahl, Mark
author_sort Holden, Jameson
collection PubMed
description Reaction time testing is widely used in online computerized concussion assessments, and most concussion studies utilizing the metric have demonstrated varying degrees of difference between concussed and non-concussed individuals. The problem with most of these online concussion assessments is that they predominantly rely on consumer grade technology. Typical administration of these reaction time tests involves presenting a visual stimulus on a computer monitor and prompting the test subject to respond as quickly as possible via keypad or computer mouse. However, inherent delays and variabilities are introduced to the reaction time measure by both computer and associated operating systems that the concussion assessment tool is installed on. The authors hypothesized systems that are typically used to collect concussion reaction time data would demonstrate significant errors in reaction time measurements. To remove human bias, a series of experiments was conducted robotically to assess timing errors introduced by reaction time tests under four different conditions. In the first condition, a visual reaction time test was conducted by flashing a visual stimulus on a computer monitor. Detection was via photodiode and mechanical response was delivered via computer mouse. The second condition employed a mobile device for the visual stimulus, and the mechanical response was delivered to the mobile device's touchscreen. The third condition simulated a tactile reaction time test, and mechanical response was delivered via computer mouse. The fourth condition also simulated a tactile reaction time test, but response was delivered to a dedicated device designed to store the interval between stimulus delivery and response, thus bypassing any problems hypothesized to be introduced by computer and/or computer software. There were significant differences in the range of responses recorded from the four different conditions with the reaction time collected from visual stimulus on a mobile device being the worst and the device with dedicated hardware designed for the task being the best. The results suggest that some of the commonly used visual tasks on consumer grade computers could be (and have been) introducing significant errors for reaction time testing and that dedicated hardware designed for the reaction time task is needed to minimize testing errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75593972020-10-30 Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing Holden, Jameson Francisco, Eric Tommerdahl, Anna Lensch, Rachel Kirsch, Bryan Zai, Laila Pearce, Alan J. Favorov, Oleg V. Dennis, Robert G. Tommerdahl, Mark Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Reaction time testing is widely used in online computerized concussion assessments, and most concussion studies utilizing the metric have demonstrated varying degrees of difference between concussed and non-concussed individuals. The problem with most of these online concussion assessments is that they predominantly rely on consumer grade technology. Typical administration of these reaction time tests involves presenting a visual stimulus on a computer monitor and prompting the test subject to respond as quickly as possible via keypad or computer mouse. However, inherent delays and variabilities are introduced to the reaction time measure by both computer and associated operating systems that the concussion assessment tool is installed on. The authors hypothesized systems that are typically used to collect concussion reaction time data would demonstrate significant errors in reaction time measurements. To remove human bias, a series of experiments was conducted robotically to assess timing errors introduced by reaction time tests under four different conditions. In the first condition, a visual reaction time test was conducted by flashing a visual stimulus on a computer monitor. Detection was via photodiode and mechanical response was delivered via computer mouse. The second condition employed a mobile device for the visual stimulus, and the mechanical response was delivered to the mobile device's touchscreen. The third condition simulated a tactile reaction time test, and mechanical response was delivered via computer mouse. The fourth condition also simulated a tactile reaction time test, but response was delivered to a dedicated device designed to store the interval between stimulus delivery and response, thus bypassing any problems hypothesized to be introduced by computer and/or computer software. There were significant differences in the range of responses recorded from the four different conditions with the reaction time collected from visual stimulus on a mobile device being the worst and the device with dedicated hardware designed for the task being the best. The results suggest that some of the commonly used visual tasks on consumer grade computers could be (and have been) introducing significant errors for reaction time testing and that dedicated hardware designed for the reaction time task is needed to minimize testing errors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7559397/ /pubmed/33132870 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.509091 Text en Copyright © 2020 Holden, Francisco, Tommerdahl, Lensch, Kirsch, Zai, Pearce, Favorov, Dennis and Tommerdahl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Holden, Jameson
Francisco, Eric
Tommerdahl, Anna
Lensch, Rachel
Kirsch, Bryan
Zai, Laila
Pearce, Alan J.
Favorov, Oleg V.
Dennis, Robert G.
Tommerdahl, Mark
Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing
title Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing
title_full Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing
title_fullStr Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing
title_short Methodological Problems With Online Concussion Testing
title_sort methodological problems with online concussion testing
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33132870
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.509091
work_keys_str_mv AT holdenjameson methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT franciscoeric methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT tommerdahlanna methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT lenschrachel methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT kirschbryan methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT zailaila methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT pearcealanj methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT favorovolegv methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT dennisrobertg methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting
AT tommerdahlmark methodologicalproblemswithonlineconcussiontesting