Cargando…

Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial

Background: Brief counseling and self-monitoring with a pedometer are common practice within primary care for physical activity promotion. It is unknown how high-tech electronic activity monitors compare to pedometers within this setting. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes, through effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Zakkoyya H., Ottenbacher, Kenneth J., Fisher, Steve R., Jennings, Kristofer, Brown, Arleen F., Swartz, Maria C., Martinez, Eloisa, Lyons, Elizabeth J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186800
_version_ 1783594852413341696
author Lewis, Zakkoyya H.
Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
Fisher, Steve R.
Jennings, Kristofer
Brown, Arleen F.
Swartz, Maria C.
Martinez, Eloisa
Lyons, Elizabeth J.
author_facet Lewis, Zakkoyya H.
Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
Fisher, Steve R.
Jennings, Kristofer
Brown, Arleen F.
Swartz, Maria C.
Martinez, Eloisa
Lyons, Elizabeth J.
author_sort Lewis, Zakkoyya H.
collection PubMed
description Background: Brief counseling and self-monitoring with a pedometer are common practice within primary care for physical activity promotion. It is unknown how high-tech electronic activity monitors compare to pedometers within this setting. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes, through effect size estimation, of an electronic activity monitor-based intervention to increase physical activity and decrease cardiovascular disease risk. Method: The pilot randomized controlled trial was pre-registered online at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02554435). Forty overweight, sedentary participants 55–74 years of age were randomized to wear a pedometer or an electronic activity monitor for 12 weeks. Physical activity was measured objectively for 7 days at baseline and follow-up by a SenseWear monitor and cardiovascular disease risk was estimated by the Framingham risk calculator. Results: Effect sizes for behavioral and health outcomes ranged from small to medium. While these effect sizes were favorable to the intervention group for physical activity (PA) (d = 0.78) and general health (d = 0.39), they were not favorable for measures. Conclusion: The results of this pilot trial show promise for this low-intensity intervention strategy, but large-scale trials are needed to test its efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75593992020-10-26 Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial Lewis, Zakkoyya H. Ottenbacher, Kenneth J. Fisher, Steve R. Jennings, Kristofer Brown, Arleen F. Swartz, Maria C. Martinez, Eloisa Lyons, Elizabeth J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Brief counseling and self-monitoring with a pedometer are common practice within primary care for physical activity promotion. It is unknown how high-tech electronic activity monitors compare to pedometers within this setting. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes, through effect size estimation, of an electronic activity monitor-based intervention to increase physical activity and decrease cardiovascular disease risk. Method: The pilot randomized controlled trial was pre-registered online at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02554435). Forty overweight, sedentary participants 55–74 years of age were randomized to wear a pedometer or an electronic activity monitor for 12 weeks. Physical activity was measured objectively for 7 days at baseline and follow-up by a SenseWear monitor and cardiovascular disease risk was estimated by the Framingham risk calculator. Results: Effect sizes for behavioral and health outcomes ranged from small to medium. While these effect sizes were favorable to the intervention group for physical activity (PA) (d = 0.78) and general health (d = 0.39), they were not favorable for measures. Conclusion: The results of this pilot trial show promise for this low-intensity intervention strategy, but large-scale trials are needed to test its efficacy. MDPI 2020-09-18 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7559399/ /pubmed/32961834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186800 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lewis, Zakkoyya H.
Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.
Fisher, Steve R.
Jennings, Kristofer
Brown, Arleen F.
Swartz, Maria C.
Martinez, Eloisa
Lyons, Elizabeth J.
Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial
title Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial
title_full Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial
title_short Effect of Electronic Activity Monitors and Pedometers on Health: Results from the TAME Health Pilot Randomized Pragmatic Trial
title_sort effect of electronic activity monitors and pedometers on health: results from the tame health pilot randomized pragmatic trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186800
work_keys_str_mv AT lewiszakkoyyah effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT ottenbacherkennethj effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT fisherstever effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT jenningskristofer effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT brownarleenf effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT swartzmariac effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT martinezeloisa effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial
AT lyonselizabethj effectofelectronicactivitymonitorsandpedometersonhealthresultsfromthetamehealthpilotrandomizedpragmatictrial