Cargando…
Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) requires abutment disconnection to monitor implant stability. To overcome this limitation, an experimental transepithelial abutment was designed to allow a SmartPeg to be screwed onto it, in order to determine the prototype abutments repeatability and reproducibili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32947802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186733 |
_version_ | 1783594855003324416 |
---|---|
author | Guerrero-González, María Monticelli, Francesca Saura García-Martín, David Herrero-Climent, Mariano Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente Fernández-Palacín, Ana |
author_facet | Guerrero-González, María Monticelli, Francesca Saura García-Martín, David Herrero-Climent, Mariano Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente Fernández-Palacín, Ana |
author_sort | Guerrero-González, María |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) requires abutment disconnection to monitor implant stability. To overcome this limitation, an experimental transepithelial abutment was designed to allow a SmartPeg to be screwed onto it, in order to determine the prototype abutments repeatability and reproducibility using Osstell ISQ and to assess whether implant length and diameter have an influence on the reliability of these measurements. RFA was conducted with a SmartPeg screwed directly into the implant and onto experimental abutments of different heights of 2, 3.5 and 5 mm. A total of 32 patients (116 implants) were tested. RFA measurements were taken twice for each group from mesial, distal, buccal and palatal/lingual surfaces. Mean values and SD were calculated and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) (p < 0.05, IC 95%). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) mean values were 72.581 measured directly to implant and 72.899 (2 mm), 72.391 (3.5 mm) and 71.458 (5 mm) measured from the prototypes. ICC between measurements made directly to implant and through 2-, 3.5- and 5-mm abutments were 0.908, 0.919 and 0.939, respectively. RFA values registered through the experimental transepithelial abutments achieved a high reliability. Neither the implant length nor the diameter had any influence on the measurements’ reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7559410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75594102020-10-26 Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study Guerrero-González, María Monticelli, Francesca Saura García-Martín, David Herrero-Climent, Mariano Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente Fernández-Palacín, Ana Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) requires abutment disconnection to monitor implant stability. To overcome this limitation, an experimental transepithelial abutment was designed to allow a SmartPeg to be screwed onto it, in order to determine the prototype abutments repeatability and reproducibility using Osstell ISQ and to assess whether implant length and diameter have an influence on the reliability of these measurements. RFA was conducted with a SmartPeg screwed directly into the implant and onto experimental abutments of different heights of 2, 3.5 and 5 mm. A total of 32 patients (116 implants) were tested. RFA measurements were taken twice for each group from mesial, distal, buccal and palatal/lingual surfaces. Mean values and SD were calculated and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) (p < 0.05, IC 95%). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) mean values were 72.581 measured directly to implant and 72.899 (2 mm), 72.391 (3.5 mm) and 71.458 (5 mm) measured from the prototypes. ICC between measurements made directly to implant and through 2-, 3.5- and 5-mm abutments were 0.908, 0.919 and 0.939, respectively. RFA values registered through the experimental transepithelial abutments achieved a high reliability. Neither the implant length nor the diameter had any influence on the measurements’ reliability. MDPI 2020-09-16 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7559410/ /pubmed/32947802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186733 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Guerrero-González, María Monticelli, Francesca Saura García-Martín, David Herrero-Climent, Mariano Ríos-Carrasco, Blanca Ríos-Santos, José-Vicente Fernández-Palacín, Ana Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study |
title | Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study |
title_full | Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study |
title_fullStr | Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study |
title_short | Reliability of the Resonance Frequency Analysis Values in New Prototype Transepithelial Abutments: A Prospective Clinical Study |
title_sort | reliability of the resonance frequency analysis values in new prototype transepithelial abutments: a prospective clinical study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32947802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guerrerogonzalezmaria reliabilityoftheresonancefrequencyanalysisvaluesinnewprototypetransepithelialabutmentsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT monticellifrancesca reliabilityoftheresonancefrequencyanalysisvaluesinnewprototypetransepithelialabutmentsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT sauragarciamartindavid reliabilityoftheresonancefrequencyanalysisvaluesinnewprototypetransepithelialabutmentsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT herreroclimentmariano reliabilityoftheresonancefrequencyanalysisvaluesinnewprototypetransepithelialabutmentsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT rioscarrascoblanca reliabilityoftheresonancefrequencyanalysisvaluesinnewprototypetransepithelialabutmentsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT riossantosjosevicente reliabilityoftheresonancefrequencyanalysisvaluesinnewprototypetransepithelialabutmentsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT fernandezpalacinana reliabilityoftheresonancefrequencyanalysisvaluesinnewprototypetransepithelialabutmentsaprospectiveclinicalstudy |