Cargando…
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, with more than 264 million people affected. On average, depression first appears during the late teens to mid-20s as result of a complex interaction of social, psychological and biological factors. The aim of this systematic review wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186686 |
_version_ | 1783594872853233664 |
---|---|
author | Nucci, Daniele Fatigoni, Cristina Amerio, Andrea Odone, Anna Gianfredi, Vincenza |
author_facet | Nucci, Daniele Fatigoni, Cristina Amerio, Andrea Odone, Anna Gianfredi, Vincenza |
author_sort | Nucci, Daniele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, with more than 264 million people affected. On average, depression first appears during the late teens to mid-20s as result of a complex interaction of social, psychological and biological factors. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to assess the association between red and processed meat intake and depression (both incident and prevalent). This systematic review was conducted according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant papers published through March 2020 were identified by searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. All analyses were conducted using ProMeta3 software. A critical appraisal was conducted. Finally, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall effect size (ES) of depression for red and processed meat intake was 1.08 [(95% CI = 1.04; 1.12), p-value < 0.001], based on 241,738 participants. The results from our meta-analysis showed a significant association between red and processed meat intake and risk of depression. The presented synthesis will be useful for health professionals and policy makers to better consider the effect of diet on mental health status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7559491 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75594912020-10-26 Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nucci, Daniele Fatigoni, Cristina Amerio, Andrea Odone, Anna Gianfredi, Vincenza Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, with more than 264 million people affected. On average, depression first appears during the late teens to mid-20s as result of a complex interaction of social, psychological and biological factors. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to assess the association between red and processed meat intake and depression (both incident and prevalent). This systematic review was conducted according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant papers published through March 2020 were identified by searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. All analyses were conducted using ProMeta3 software. A critical appraisal was conducted. Finally, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall effect size (ES) of depression for red and processed meat intake was 1.08 [(95% CI = 1.04; 1.12), p-value < 0.001], based on 241,738 participants. The results from our meta-analysis showed a significant association between red and processed meat intake and risk of depression. The presented synthesis will be useful for health professionals and policy makers to better consider the effect of diet on mental health status. MDPI 2020-09-14 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7559491/ /pubmed/32937855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186686 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Nucci, Daniele Fatigoni, Cristina Amerio, Andrea Odone, Anna Gianfredi, Vincenza Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | red and processed meat consumption and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559491/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nuccidaniele redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fatigonicristina redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT amerioandrea redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT odoneanna redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gianfredivincenza redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |