Cargando…

Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, with more than 264 million people affected. On average, depression first appears during the late teens to mid-20s as result of a complex interaction of social, psychological and biological factors. The aim of this systematic review wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nucci, Daniele, Fatigoni, Cristina, Amerio, Andrea, Odone, Anna, Gianfredi, Vincenza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186686
_version_ 1783594872853233664
author Nucci, Daniele
Fatigoni, Cristina
Amerio, Andrea
Odone, Anna
Gianfredi, Vincenza
author_facet Nucci, Daniele
Fatigoni, Cristina
Amerio, Andrea
Odone, Anna
Gianfredi, Vincenza
author_sort Nucci, Daniele
collection PubMed
description Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, with more than 264 million people affected. On average, depression first appears during the late teens to mid-20s as result of a complex interaction of social, psychological and biological factors. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to assess the association between red and processed meat intake and depression (both incident and prevalent). This systematic review was conducted according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant papers published through March 2020 were identified by searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. All analyses were conducted using ProMeta3 software. A critical appraisal was conducted. Finally, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall effect size (ES) of depression for red and processed meat intake was 1.08 [(95% CI = 1.04; 1.12), p-value < 0.001], based on 241,738 participants. The results from our meta-analysis showed a significant association between red and processed meat intake and risk of depression. The presented synthesis will be useful for health professionals and policy makers to better consider the effect of diet on mental health status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75594912020-10-26 Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nucci, Daniele Fatigoni, Cristina Amerio, Andrea Odone, Anna Gianfredi, Vincenza Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, with more than 264 million people affected. On average, depression first appears during the late teens to mid-20s as result of a complex interaction of social, psychological and biological factors. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to assess the association between red and processed meat intake and depression (both incident and prevalent). This systematic review was conducted according to the methods recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant papers published through March 2020 were identified by searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. All analyses were conducted using ProMeta3 software. A critical appraisal was conducted. Finally, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall effect size (ES) of depression for red and processed meat intake was 1.08 [(95% CI = 1.04; 1.12), p-value < 0.001], based on 241,738 participants. The results from our meta-analysis showed a significant association between red and processed meat intake and risk of depression. The presented synthesis will be useful for health professionals and policy makers to better consider the effect of diet on mental health status. MDPI 2020-09-14 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7559491/ /pubmed/32937855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186686 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Nucci, Daniele
Fatigoni, Cristina
Amerio, Andrea
Odone, Anna
Gianfredi, Vincenza
Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort red and processed meat consumption and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186686
work_keys_str_mv AT nuccidaniele redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fatigonicristina redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amerioandrea redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT odoneanna redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gianfredivincenza redandprocessedmeatconsumptionandriskofdepressionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis