Cargando…

An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection

BACKGROUND: Projection of future cancer incidence is an important task in cancer epidemiology. The results are of interest also for biomedical research and public health policy. Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models, usually based on long-term cancer registry data (> 20 yrs), are established for such pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knoll, Maximilian, Furkel, Jennifer, Debus, Jürgen, Abdollahi, Amir, Karch, André, Stock, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01133-5
_version_ 1783594895329460224
author Knoll, Maximilian
Furkel, Jennifer
Debus, Jürgen
Abdollahi, Amir
Karch, André
Stock, Christian
author_facet Knoll, Maximilian
Furkel, Jennifer
Debus, Jürgen
Abdollahi, Amir
Karch, André
Stock, Christian
author_sort Knoll, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Projection of future cancer incidence is an important task in cancer epidemiology. The results are of interest also for biomedical research and public health policy. Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models, usually based on long-term cancer registry data (> 20 yrs), are established for such projections. In many countries (including Germany), however, nationwide long-term data are not yet available. General guidance on statistical approaches for projections using rather short-term data is challenging and software to enable researchers to easily compare approaches is lacking. METHODS: To enable a comparative analysis of the performance of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection, we developed an R package (incAnalysis), supporting in particular Bayesian models fitted by Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations (INLA). Its use is demonstrated by an extensive empirical evaluation of operating characteristics (bias, coverage and precision) of potentially applicable models differing by complexity. Observed long-term data from three cancer registries (SEER-9, NORDCAN, Saarland) was used for benchmarking. RESULTS: Overall, coverage was high (mostly > 90%) for Bayesian APC models (BAPC), whereas less complex models showed differences in coverage dependent on projection-period. Intercept-only models yielded values below 20% for coverage. Bias increased and precision decreased for longer projection periods (> 15 years) for all except intercept-only models. Precision was lowest for complex models such as BAPC models, generalized additive models with multivariate smoothers and generalized linear models with age x period interaction effects. CONCLUSION: The incAnalysis R package allows a straightforward comparison of cancer incidence rate projection approaches. Further detailed and targeted investigations into model performance in addition to the presented empirical results are recommended to derive guidance on appropriate statistical projection methods in a given setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75595912020-10-16 An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection Knoll, Maximilian Furkel, Jennifer Debus, Jürgen Abdollahi, Amir Karch, André Stock, Christian BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Projection of future cancer incidence is an important task in cancer epidemiology. The results are of interest also for biomedical research and public health policy. Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models, usually based on long-term cancer registry data (> 20 yrs), are established for such projections. In many countries (including Germany), however, nationwide long-term data are not yet available. General guidance on statistical approaches for projections using rather short-term data is challenging and software to enable researchers to easily compare approaches is lacking. METHODS: To enable a comparative analysis of the performance of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection, we developed an R package (incAnalysis), supporting in particular Bayesian models fitted by Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations (INLA). Its use is demonstrated by an extensive empirical evaluation of operating characteristics (bias, coverage and precision) of potentially applicable models differing by complexity. Observed long-term data from three cancer registries (SEER-9, NORDCAN, Saarland) was used for benchmarking. RESULTS: Overall, coverage was high (mostly > 90%) for Bayesian APC models (BAPC), whereas less complex models showed differences in coverage dependent on projection-period. Intercept-only models yielded values below 20% for coverage. Bias increased and precision decreased for longer projection periods (> 15 years) for all except intercept-only models. Precision was lowest for complex models such as BAPC models, generalized additive models with multivariate smoothers and generalized linear models with age x period interaction effects. CONCLUSION: The incAnalysis R package allows a straightforward comparison of cancer incidence rate projection approaches. Further detailed and targeted investigations into model performance in addition to the presented empirical results are recommended to derive guidance on appropriate statistical projection methods in a given setting. BioMed Central 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7559591/ /pubmed/33059585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01133-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Knoll, Maximilian
Furkel, Jennifer
Debus, Jürgen
Abdollahi, Amir
Karch, André
Stock, Christian
An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection
title An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection
title_full An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection
title_fullStr An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection
title_full_unstemmed An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection
title_short An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection
title_sort r package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33059585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01133-5
work_keys_str_mv AT knollmaximilian anrpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT furkeljennifer anrpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT debusjurgen anrpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT abdollahiamir anrpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT karchandre anrpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT stockchristian anrpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT knollmaximilian rpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT furkeljennifer rpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT debusjurgen rpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT abdollahiamir rpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT karchandre rpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection
AT stockchristian rpackageforanintegratedevaluationofstatisticalapproachestocancerincidenceprojection