Cargando…

Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the influencing factors associated with long onset‐to‐door time and establish predictive models that could help to assess the probability of prehospital delay in populations with a high risk for stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Li, Liu, Qinqin, Zhao, Qiuli, Zhu, Xuemei, Wang, Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1794
_version_ 1783594899317194752
author Yang, Li
Liu, Qinqin
Zhao, Qiuli
Zhu, Xuemei
Wang, Ling
author_facet Yang, Li
Liu, Qinqin
Zhao, Qiuli
Zhu, Xuemei
Wang, Ling
author_sort Yang, Li
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the influencing factors associated with long onset‐to‐door time and establish predictive models that could help to assess the probability of prehospital delay in populations with a high risk for stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2019 were interviewed, and their medical records were extracted for data analysis. Two machine learning algorithms (support vector machine and Bayesian network) were applied in this study, and their predictive performance was compared with that of the classical logistic regression models after using several variable selection methods. Timely admission (onset‐to‐door time < 3 hr) and prehospital delay (onset‐to‐door time ≥ 3 hr) were the outcome variables. We computed the area under curve (AUC) and the difference in the mean AUC values between the models. RESULTS: A total of 450 patients with AIS were enrolled; 57 (12.7%) with timely admission and 393 (87.3%) patients with prehospital delay. All models, both those constructed by logistic regression and those by machine learning, performed well in predicting prehospital delay (range mean AUC: 0.800–0.846). The difference in the mean AUC values between the best performing machine learning model and the best performing logistic regression model was negligible (0.014; 95% CI: 0.013–0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms were not inferior to logistic regression models for prediction of prehospital delay after stroke. All models provided good discrimination, thereby creating valuable diagnostic programs for prehospital delay prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75596082020-10-20 Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke Yang, Li Liu, Qinqin Zhao, Qiuli Zhu, Xuemei Wang, Ling Brain Behav Original Research OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the influencing factors associated with long onset‐to‐door time and establish predictive models that could help to assess the probability of prehospital delay in populations with a high risk for stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and hospitalized between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2019 were interviewed, and their medical records were extracted for data analysis. Two machine learning algorithms (support vector machine and Bayesian network) were applied in this study, and their predictive performance was compared with that of the classical logistic regression models after using several variable selection methods. Timely admission (onset‐to‐door time < 3 hr) and prehospital delay (onset‐to‐door time ≥ 3 hr) were the outcome variables. We computed the area under curve (AUC) and the difference in the mean AUC values between the models. RESULTS: A total of 450 patients with AIS were enrolled; 57 (12.7%) with timely admission and 393 (87.3%) patients with prehospital delay. All models, both those constructed by logistic regression and those by machine learning, performed well in predicting prehospital delay (range mean AUC: 0.800–0.846). The difference in the mean AUC values between the best performing machine learning model and the best performing logistic regression model was negligible (0.014; 95% CI: 0.013–0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms were not inferior to logistic regression models for prediction of prehospital delay after stroke. All models provided good discrimination, thereby creating valuable diagnostic programs for prehospital delay prediction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7559608/ /pubmed/32812396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1794 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yang, Li
Liu, Qinqin
Zhao, Qiuli
Zhu, Xuemei
Wang, Ling
Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
title Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
title_full Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
title_fullStr Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
title_short Machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
title_sort machine learning is a valid method for predicting prehospital delay after acute ischemic stroke
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812396
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1794
work_keys_str_mv AT yangli machinelearningisavalidmethodforpredictingprehospitaldelayafteracuteischemicstroke
AT liuqinqin machinelearningisavalidmethodforpredictingprehospitaldelayafteracuteischemicstroke
AT zhaoqiuli machinelearningisavalidmethodforpredictingprehospitaldelayafteracuteischemicstroke
AT zhuxuemei machinelearningisavalidmethodforpredictingprehospitaldelayafteracuteischemicstroke
AT wangling machinelearningisavalidmethodforpredictingprehospitaldelayafteracuteischemicstroke