Cargando…

Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is a good choice for resection of rectal neoplasms. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is also widely used in the treatment of benign rectal tumors such as rectal polyps and rectal adenomas. However, no studies have compared the outcome of TAM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Jia-Men, Zhao, Jia-Ying, Ye, Tao, Gong, Li-Feng, Wang, Hui-Peng, Chen, Wen-Jie, Cai, Yuan-Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083390
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311
_version_ 1783594913006354432
author Shen, Jia-Men
Zhao, Jia-Ying
Ye, Tao
Gong, Li-Feng
Wang, Hui-Peng
Chen, Wen-Jie
Cai, Yuan-Kun
author_facet Shen, Jia-Men
Zhao, Jia-Ying
Ye, Tao
Gong, Li-Feng
Wang, Hui-Peng
Chen, Wen-Jie
Cai, Yuan-Kun
author_sort Shen, Jia-Men
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is a good choice for resection of rectal neoplasms. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is also widely used in the treatment of benign rectal tumors such as rectal polyps and rectal adenomas. However, no studies have compared the outcome of TAMIS and EMR. AIM: To compare the short-term outcomes after TAMIS and EMR for rectal carcinoid and benign tumors (including rectal polyps and adenomas). METHODS: From January 2014 to January 2019, 44 patients who received TAMIS and 53 patients who received EMR at The Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai were selected. Primary outcomes (surgical-related) were operating time, blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, rate of resection margin involvement and lesion fragmentation rate. The secondary outcomes were complications such as hemorrhage, urinary retention, postoperative infection and reoperation. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in terms of blood loss (12.48 ± 8.00 mL for TAMIS vs 11.45 ± 7.82 mL for EMR, P = 0.527) and length of postoperative hospital stay (3.50 ± 1.87 d for TAMIS vs 2.72 ± 1.98 d for EMR, P = 0.065) between the two groups. Operating time was significantly shorter for EMR compared with TAMIS (21.19 ± 9.49 min vs 49.95 ± 15.28 min, P = 0.001). The lesion fragmentation rate in the EMR group was 22.6% (12/53) and was significantly higher than that (0%, 0/44) in the TAMIS group (P = 0.001). TAMIS was associated with a higher urinary retention rate (13.6%, 6/44 vs 1.9%, 1/53 P = 0.026) and lower hemorrhage rate (0%, 0/44 vs 18.9%, 10/53 P = 0.002). A significantly higher reoperation rate was observed in the EMR group (9.4%, 5/53 vs 0%, 0/44 P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Compared with EMR, TAMIS can remove lesions more completely with effective hemostasis and lower postoperative hemorrhage and reoperation rates. TAMIS is a better choice for the treatment of rectal carcinoids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75596692020-10-19 Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis Shen, Jia-Men Zhao, Jia-Ying Ye, Tao Gong, Li-Feng Wang, Hui-Peng Chen, Wen-Jie Cai, Yuan-Kun World J Clin Cases Case Control Study BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is a good choice for resection of rectal neoplasms. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is also widely used in the treatment of benign rectal tumors such as rectal polyps and rectal adenomas. However, no studies have compared the outcome of TAMIS and EMR. AIM: To compare the short-term outcomes after TAMIS and EMR for rectal carcinoid and benign tumors (including rectal polyps and adenomas). METHODS: From January 2014 to January 2019, 44 patients who received TAMIS and 53 patients who received EMR at The Fifth People’s Hospital of Shanghai were selected. Primary outcomes (surgical-related) were operating time, blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, rate of resection margin involvement and lesion fragmentation rate. The secondary outcomes were complications such as hemorrhage, urinary retention, postoperative infection and reoperation. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in terms of blood loss (12.48 ± 8.00 mL for TAMIS vs 11.45 ± 7.82 mL for EMR, P = 0.527) and length of postoperative hospital stay (3.50 ± 1.87 d for TAMIS vs 2.72 ± 1.98 d for EMR, P = 0.065) between the two groups. Operating time was significantly shorter for EMR compared with TAMIS (21.19 ± 9.49 min vs 49.95 ± 15.28 min, P = 0.001). The lesion fragmentation rate in the EMR group was 22.6% (12/53) and was significantly higher than that (0%, 0/44) in the TAMIS group (P = 0.001). TAMIS was associated with a higher urinary retention rate (13.6%, 6/44 vs 1.9%, 1/53 P = 0.026) and lower hemorrhage rate (0%, 0/44 vs 18.9%, 10/53 P = 0.002). A significantly higher reoperation rate was observed in the EMR group (9.4%, 5/53 vs 0%, 0/44 P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Compared with EMR, TAMIS can remove lesions more completely with effective hemostasis and lower postoperative hemorrhage and reoperation rates. TAMIS is a better choice for the treatment of rectal carcinoids. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-10-06 2020-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7559669/ /pubmed/33083390 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Case Control Study
Shen, Jia-Men
Zhao, Jia-Ying
Ye, Tao
Gong, Li-Feng
Wang, Hui-Peng
Chen, Wen-Jie
Cai, Yuan-Kun
Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis
title Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis
title_full Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis
title_short Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis
title_sort transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: a retrospective analysis
topic Case Control Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33083390
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311
work_keys_str_mv AT shenjiamen transanalminimallyinvasivesurgeryvsendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalbenigntumorsandrectalcarcinoidsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT zhaojiaying transanalminimallyinvasivesurgeryvsendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalbenigntumorsandrectalcarcinoidsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yetao transanalminimallyinvasivesurgeryvsendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalbenigntumorsandrectalcarcinoidsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT gonglifeng transanalminimallyinvasivesurgeryvsendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalbenigntumorsandrectalcarcinoidsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT wanghuipeng transanalminimallyinvasivesurgeryvsendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalbenigntumorsandrectalcarcinoidsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT chenwenjie transanalminimallyinvasivesurgeryvsendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalbenigntumorsandrectalcarcinoidsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT caiyuankun transanalminimallyinvasivesurgeryvsendoscopicmucosalresectionforrectalbenigntumorsandrectalcarcinoidsaretrospectiveanalysis