Cargando…
Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
BACKGROUND: A defecation disorder (DD) is a difficulty in evacuation documented by physiological exams. However, this physiological evaluation can be cumbersome, inaccessible and costly. Three “low-cost” tools to evaluate DD—a clinical DD score, the balloon expulsion test (BET) and a digital rectal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33054847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01490-x |
_version_ | 1783594935760453632 |
---|---|
author | Caetano, A. C. Costa, D. Gonçalves, R. Correia-Pinto, J. Rolanda, C. |
author_facet | Caetano, A. C. Costa, D. Gonçalves, R. Correia-Pinto, J. Rolanda, C. |
author_sort | Caetano, A. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A defecation disorder (DD) is a difficulty in evacuation documented by physiological exams. However, this physiological evaluation can be cumbersome, inaccessible and costly. Three “low-cost” tools to evaluate DD—a clinical DD score, the balloon expulsion test (BET) and a digital rectal examination (DRE) score were evaluated as separate or combined tests for DD screening. METHODS: This prospective study occurred between January 2015 and March 2019 in the Gastroenterology Department of a tertiary hospital. Besides the gold standard physiological tests, constipated patients answered the clinical DD score and were evaluated by DRE and BET [standard and variable volume (VV)]. RESULTS: From 98 constipated patients, 35 (38.9%) were diagnosed with DD according to Rome IV criteria, mainly female (n = 30, 86%) with a median age of 60 years old. The clinical DD score revealed an AUC of 0.417 (SE = 0.07, p = 0.191). The DRE score displayed an AUC of 0.56 (SE = 0.063, p = 0.301). The standard BET displayed a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 58%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 57% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. The sequential VVBET followed by standard BET improved the BET performance regarding the evaluation of DD, with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 67%, PPV of 63% and NPV of 87%. The sequential BET had an OR 8.942, p > 0.001, CI 3.18–25.14, revealing to be the most significant predictor for DD screening. CONCLUSION: The sequential BET is a low cost, well-performing DD screening tool, appropriate to the Primary Care Setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7559767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75597672020-10-16 Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? Caetano, A. C. Costa, D. Gonçalves, R. Correia-Pinto, J. Rolanda, C. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: A defecation disorder (DD) is a difficulty in evacuation documented by physiological exams. However, this physiological evaluation can be cumbersome, inaccessible and costly. Three “low-cost” tools to evaluate DD—a clinical DD score, the balloon expulsion test (BET) and a digital rectal examination (DRE) score were evaluated as separate or combined tests for DD screening. METHODS: This prospective study occurred between January 2015 and March 2019 in the Gastroenterology Department of a tertiary hospital. Besides the gold standard physiological tests, constipated patients answered the clinical DD score and were evaluated by DRE and BET [standard and variable volume (VV)]. RESULTS: From 98 constipated patients, 35 (38.9%) were diagnosed with DD according to Rome IV criteria, mainly female (n = 30, 86%) with a median age of 60 years old. The clinical DD score revealed an AUC of 0.417 (SE = 0.07, p = 0.191). The DRE score displayed an AUC of 0.56 (SE = 0.063, p = 0.301). The standard BET displayed a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 58%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 57% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. The sequential VVBET followed by standard BET improved the BET performance regarding the evaluation of DD, with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 67%, PPV of 63% and NPV of 87%. The sequential BET had an OR 8.942, p > 0.001, CI 3.18–25.14, revealing to be the most significant predictor for DD screening. CONCLUSION: The sequential BET is a low cost, well-performing DD screening tool, appropriate to the Primary Care Setting. BioMed Central 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7559767/ /pubmed/33054847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01490-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Caetano, A. C. Costa, D. Gonçalves, R. Correia-Pinto, J. Rolanda, C. Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? |
title | Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? |
title_full | Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? |
title_fullStr | Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? |
title_short | Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? |
title_sort | does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33054847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01490-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caetanoac doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders AT costad doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders AT goncalvesr doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders AT correiapintoj doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders AT rolandac doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders |