Cargando…

Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?

BACKGROUND: A defecation disorder (DD) is a difficulty in evacuation documented by physiological exams. However, this physiological evaluation can be cumbersome, inaccessible and costly. Three “low-cost” tools to evaluate DD—a clinical DD score, the balloon expulsion test (BET) and a digital rectal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caetano, A. C., Costa, D., Gonçalves, R., Correia-Pinto, J., Rolanda, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33054847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01490-x
_version_ 1783594935760453632
author Caetano, A. C.
Costa, D.
Gonçalves, R.
Correia-Pinto, J.
Rolanda, C.
author_facet Caetano, A. C.
Costa, D.
Gonçalves, R.
Correia-Pinto, J.
Rolanda, C.
author_sort Caetano, A. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A defecation disorder (DD) is a difficulty in evacuation documented by physiological exams. However, this physiological evaluation can be cumbersome, inaccessible and costly. Three “low-cost” tools to evaluate DD—a clinical DD score, the balloon expulsion test (BET) and a digital rectal examination (DRE) score were evaluated as separate or combined tests for DD screening. METHODS: This prospective study occurred between January 2015 and March 2019 in the Gastroenterology Department of a tertiary hospital. Besides the gold standard physiological tests, constipated patients answered the clinical DD score and were evaluated by DRE and BET [standard and variable volume (VV)]. RESULTS: From 98 constipated patients, 35 (38.9%) were diagnosed with DD according to Rome IV criteria, mainly female (n = 30, 86%) with a median age of 60 years old. The clinical DD score revealed an AUC of 0.417 (SE = 0.07, p = 0.191). The DRE score displayed an AUC of 0.56 (SE = 0.063, p = 0.301). The standard BET displayed a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 58%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 57% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. The sequential VVBET followed by standard BET improved the BET performance regarding the evaluation of DD, with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 67%, PPV of 63% and NPV of 87%. The sequential BET had an OR 8.942, p > 0.001, CI 3.18–25.14, revealing to be the most significant predictor for DD screening. CONCLUSION: The sequential BET is a low cost, well-performing DD screening tool, appropriate to the Primary Care Setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7559767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75597672020-10-16 Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders? Caetano, A. C. Costa, D. Gonçalves, R. Correia-Pinto, J. Rolanda, C. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: A defecation disorder (DD) is a difficulty in evacuation documented by physiological exams. However, this physiological evaluation can be cumbersome, inaccessible and costly. Three “low-cost” tools to evaluate DD—a clinical DD score, the balloon expulsion test (BET) and a digital rectal examination (DRE) score were evaluated as separate or combined tests for DD screening. METHODS: This prospective study occurred between January 2015 and March 2019 in the Gastroenterology Department of a tertiary hospital. Besides the gold standard physiological tests, constipated patients answered the clinical DD score and were evaluated by DRE and BET [standard and variable volume (VV)]. RESULTS: From 98 constipated patients, 35 (38.9%) were diagnosed with DD according to Rome IV criteria, mainly female (n = 30, 86%) with a median age of 60 years old. The clinical DD score revealed an AUC of 0.417 (SE = 0.07, p = 0.191). The DRE score displayed an AUC of 0.56 (SE = 0.063, p = 0.301). The standard BET displayed a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 58%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 57% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. The sequential VVBET followed by standard BET improved the BET performance regarding the evaluation of DD, with a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 67%, PPV of 63% and NPV of 87%. The sequential BET had an OR 8.942, p > 0.001, CI 3.18–25.14, revealing to be the most significant predictor for DD screening. CONCLUSION: The sequential BET is a low cost, well-performing DD screening tool, appropriate to the Primary Care Setting. BioMed Central 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7559767/ /pubmed/33054847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01490-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Caetano, A. C.
Costa, D.
Gonçalves, R.
Correia-Pinto, J.
Rolanda, C.
Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
title Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
title_full Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
title_fullStr Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
title_full_unstemmed Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
title_short Does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
title_sort does sequential balloon expulsion test improve the screening of defecation disorders?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7559767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33054847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01490-x
work_keys_str_mv AT caetanoac doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders
AT costad doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders
AT goncalvesr doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders
AT correiapintoj doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders
AT rolandac doessequentialballoonexpulsiontestimprovethescreeningofdefecationdisorders