Cargando…

Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms

In order to investigate the effects of mouthwashes on oral biofilms with probiotics, we compared in biofilms the susceptibility to mouthwashes of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and oral pathogens Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Candida albicans. We also evaluated these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Qingru, Kainulainen, Veera, Stamatova, Iva, Janket, Sok-Ja, Meurman, Jukka H., Korpela, Riitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030096
_version_ 1783595021308526592
author Jiang, Qingru
Kainulainen, Veera
Stamatova, Iva
Janket, Sok-Ja
Meurman, Jukka H.
Korpela, Riitta
author_facet Jiang, Qingru
Kainulainen, Veera
Stamatova, Iva
Janket, Sok-Ja
Meurman, Jukka H.
Korpela, Riitta
author_sort Jiang, Qingru
collection PubMed
description In order to investigate the effects of mouthwashes on oral biofilms with probiotics, we compared in biofilms the susceptibility to mouthwashes of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and oral pathogens Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Candida albicans. We also evaluated these pathogens’ susceptibility to the mouthwashes and their recovery after mouthwash-rinsing in biofilms with/without LGG. First, 1-day-/3-day-old LGG-integrated multi-species biofilms were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine, essential oils, or amine fluoride/stannous fluoride. Cells were plate-counted and relative survival rates (RSRs) of LGG and pathogens calculated. Second, 1-day-/3-day-old multispecies biofilms with and without LGG were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes; cells were plate-counted and the pathogens’ RSRs were calculated. Third, 1-day-old biofilms were treated for 1 min with mouthwashes. Cells were plate-counted immediately and after 2-day cultivation. Recovery rates of pathogens were calculated and compared between biofilms with/without LGG. Live/Dead(®) staining served for structural analyses. Our results showed that RSRs of LGG were insignificantly smaller than those of pathogens in both 1-day and 3-day biofilms. No significant differences appeared in pathogens’ RSRs and recovery rates after treatment between biofilms with/without LGG. To conclude, biofilm LGG was susceptible to the mouthwashes; but biofilm LGG altered neither the mouthwash effects on oral pathogens nor affected their recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7560143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75601432020-10-22 Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms Jiang, Qingru Kainulainen, Veera Stamatova, Iva Janket, Sok-Ja Meurman, Jukka H. Korpela, Riitta Dent J (Basel) Article In order to investigate the effects of mouthwashes on oral biofilms with probiotics, we compared in biofilms the susceptibility to mouthwashes of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and oral pathogens Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Candida albicans. We also evaluated these pathogens’ susceptibility to the mouthwashes and their recovery after mouthwash-rinsing in biofilms with/without LGG. First, 1-day-/3-day-old LGG-integrated multi-species biofilms were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine, essential oils, or amine fluoride/stannous fluoride. Cells were plate-counted and relative survival rates (RSRs) of LGG and pathogens calculated. Second, 1-day-/3-day-old multispecies biofilms with and without LGG were exposed for 1 min to mouthwashes; cells were plate-counted and the pathogens’ RSRs were calculated. Third, 1-day-old biofilms were treated for 1 min with mouthwashes. Cells were plate-counted immediately and after 2-day cultivation. Recovery rates of pathogens were calculated and compared between biofilms with/without LGG. Live/Dead(®) staining served for structural analyses. Our results showed that RSRs of LGG were insignificantly smaller than those of pathogens in both 1-day and 3-day biofilms. No significant differences appeared in pathogens’ RSRs and recovery rates after treatment between biofilms with/without LGG. To conclude, biofilm LGG was susceptible to the mouthwashes; but biofilm LGG altered neither the mouthwash effects on oral pathogens nor affected their recovery. MDPI 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7560143/ /pubmed/32882798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030096 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jiang, Qingru
Kainulainen, Veera
Stamatova, Iva
Janket, Sok-Ja
Meurman, Jukka H.
Korpela, Riitta
Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms
title Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms
title_full Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms
title_fullStr Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms
title_full_unstemmed Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms
title_short Mouthwash Effects on LGG-Integrated Experimental Oral Biofilms
title_sort mouthwash effects on lgg-integrated experimental oral biofilms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32882798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8030096
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangqingru mouthwasheffectsonlggintegratedexperimentaloralbiofilms
AT kainulainenveera mouthwasheffectsonlggintegratedexperimentaloralbiofilms
AT stamatovaiva mouthwasheffectsonlggintegratedexperimentaloralbiofilms
AT janketsokja mouthwasheffectsonlggintegratedexperimentaloralbiofilms
AT meurmanjukkah mouthwasheffectsonlggintegratedexperimentaloralbiofilms
AT korpelariitta mouthwasheffectsonlggintegratedexperimentaloralbiofilms