Cargando…

Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation

Piezoelectric devices are widely used in oral surgical procedures, including implant site preparation. However, little is known about the influence of working movement on temperature elevation in bone. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of two different working cycles on temperature ele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamazza, Luca, Lollobrigida, Marco, Vozza, Iole, Palmieri, Luigi, Stacchi, Claudio, Lombardi, Teresa, De Biase, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13184072
_version_ 1783595069104717824
author Lamazza, Luca
Lollobrigida, Marco
Vozza, Iole
Palmieri, Luigi
Stacchi, Claudio
Lombardi, Teresa
De Biase, Alberto
author_facet Lamazza, Luca
Lollobrigida, Marco
Vozza, Iole
Palmieri, Luigi
Stacchi, Claudio
Lombardi, Teresa
De Biase, Alberto
author_sort Lamazza, Luca
collection PubMed
description Piezoelectric devices are widely used in oral surgical procedures, including implant site preparation. However, little is known about the influence of working movement on temperature elevation in bone. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of two different working cycles on temperature elevation during piezoelectric implant site preparation. Sixty osteotomies at a depth of 10 mm were performed on bone blocks of bovine ribs using a piezoelectric tip with external irrigation (IM1s, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy). A mechanical positioning device was used to guarantee reproducible working and measuring conditions. Two different working cycles, of 4 and 6 s, respectively, were tested, including both longitudinal and rotational movements. Temperature was recorded in real time with a fiber optic thermometer and applied pressure was maintained under 150 g. For each test, the highest recorded temperature (T(max)) and the mean temperature recorded from 30 s before to 30 s after the highest recorded temperature (T(±30)) were extrapolated. Tests duration was also recorded. Both T(max) and T(±30) were significantly higher in the ‘6 s cycles’ group than the ‘4 s cycles’ group (42.44 ± 7.3 °C vs. 37.24 ± 4.6 °C, p = 0.002; 37.24 ± 4.6 °C vs. 33.30 ± 3.3 °C, p = 0.003). Test duration was also significantly higher using 6 s cycles compared to 4 s cycles (143.17 ± 29.4 s vs. 119.80 ± 36.4 s, p = 0.002). The results of this study indicate that working cycles of 4 s effectively reduce heat generation and working time during piezoelectric implant site preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7560358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75603582020-10-22 Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation Lamazza, Luca Lollobrigida, Marco Vozza, Iole Palmieri, Luigi Stacchi, Claudio Lombardi, Teresa De Biase, Alberto Materials (Basel) Article Piezoelectric devices are widely used in oral surgical procedures, including implant site preparation. However, little is known about the influence of working movement on temperature elevation in bone. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of two different working cycles on temperature elevation during piezoelectric implant site preparation. Sixty osteotomies at a depth of 10 mm were performed on bone blocks of bovine ribs using a piezoelectric tip with external irrigation (IM1s, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy). A mechanical positioning device was used to guarantee reproducible working and measuring conditions. Two different working cycles, of 4 and 6 s, respectively, were tested, including both longitudinal and rotational movements. Temperature was recorded in real time with a fiber optic thermometer and applied pressure was maintained under 150 g. For each test, the highest recorded temperature (T(max)) and the mean temperature recorded from 30 s before to 30 s after the highest recorded temperature (T(±30)) were extrapolated. Tests duration was also recorded. Both T(max) and T(±30) were significantly higher in the ‘6 s cycles’ group than the ‘4 s cycles’ group (42.44 ± 7.3 °C vs. 37.24 ± 4.6 °C, p = 0.002; 37.24 ± 4.6 °C vs. 33.30 ± 3.3 °C, p = 0.003). Test duration was also significantly higher using 6 s cycles compared to 4 s cycles (143.17 ± 29.4 s vs. 119.80 ± 36.4 s, p = 0.002). The results of this study indicate that working cycles of 4 s effectively reduce heat generation and working time during piezoelectric implant site preparation. MDPI 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7560358/ /pubmed/32937785 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13184072 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lamazza, Luca
Lollobrigida, Marco
Vozza, Iole
Palmieri, Luigi
Stacchi, Claudio
Lombardi, Teresa
De Biase, Alberto
Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation
title Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation
title_full Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation
title_fullStr Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation
title_full_unstemmed Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation
title_short Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Influence of Handpiece Movements on Temperature Elevation
title_sort piezoelectric implant site preparation: influence of handpiece movements on temperature elevation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32937785
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13184072
work_keys_str_mv AT lamazzaluca piezoelectricimplantsitepreparationinfluenceofhandpiecemovementsontemperatureelevation
AT lollobrigidamarco piezoelectricimplantsitepreparationinfluenceofhandpiecemovementsontemperatureelevation
AT vozzaiole piezoelectricimplantsitepreparationinfluenceofhandpiecemovementsontemperatureelevation
AT palmieriluigi piezoelectricimplantsitepreparationinfluenceofhandpiecemovementsontemperatureelevation
AT stacchiclaudio piezoelectricimplantsitepreparationinfluenceofhandpiecemovementsontemperatureelevation
AT lombarditeresa piezoelectricimplantsitepreparationinfluenceofhandpiecemovementsontemperatureelevation
AT debiasealberto piezoelectricimplantsitepreparationinfluenceofhandpiecemovementsontemperatureelevation