Cargando…
Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques
PURPOSE: Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.10.007 |
_version_ | 1783595114802708480 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Haisong Thomas, Evan M. Li, Jun Yu, Yan Andrews, David Markert, James M. Fiveash, John B. Shi, Wenyin Popple, Richard A. |
author_facet | Liu, Haisong Thomas, Evan M. Li, Jun Yu, Yan Andrews, David Markert, James M. Fiveash, John B. Shi, Wenyin Popple, Richard A. |
author_sort | Liu, Haisong |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME), a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach, and Varian RapidArc (RA), a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach. In this work, we systematically compared plan quality between the 2 techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients with 4 to 10 metastases (217 total; median 7.5; V(min) = 0.014 cm(3); V(max) = 17.73 cm(3)) were planned with both Varian RA and MME at 2 different institutions with extensive experience in each respective technique. All plans had a single isocenter and used Varian linac equipped with high-definition multileaf collimator. RA plans used 2 to 4 noncoplanar VMAT arcs with 10 MV flattening filter-free beam. MME plans used 4 to 9 noncoplanar DCAs and 6 MV flattening filter-free beam, (minimum planning target volume [PTV(min]) = 0.49 cm(3); PTV(max) = 27.32 cm(3); PTV(median) = 7.05 cm(3)). Prescriptions were 14 to 24 Gy in a single fraction. Target coverage goal was 99% of volume receiving prescription dose (D99% ≥ 100%). Plans were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Paddick conformity index (CI) score, 12 Gy volume (V(12Gy)), V(8Gy), V(5Gy), mean brain dose (D(mean)), and beam-on time. RESULTS: Conformity was favorable among RA plans (median: MME CI(RTOG) = 1.38; RA CI(RTOG) = 1.21; P < .0001). V(12Gy) and V(8Gy) were lower for RA plans (median: MME V12 = 23.7 cm(3); RA V12 = 19.2 cm(3); P = .0001; median: MME V(8Gy) = 53.6 cm(3); RA V(8Gy) = 44.1 cm(3); P = .024). V(5Gy) was lower for MME plans (median: MME V(5Gy) = 141.4 cm(3); RA V(5Gy) = 142.8 cm(3); P = .009). Mean brain was lower for MME plans (median: MME D(mean) = 2.57 Gy; RA D(mean) = 2.76 Gy; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For linac-based multiple metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery, RapidArc VMAT facilitates favorable conformity and V(12Gy)/V(8Gy) volume compared with the MME DCA plan. MME planning facilitates reduced dose spill at levels ≤V(5Gy). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7560574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75605742020-10-20 Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques Liu, Haisong Thomas, Evan M. Li, Jun Yu, Yan Andrews, David Markert, James M. Fiveash, John B. Shi, Wenyin Popple, Richard A. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME), a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach, and Varian RapidArc (RA), a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach. In this work, we systematically compared plan quality between the 2 techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients with 4 to 10 metastases (217 total; median 7.5; V(min) = 0.014 cm(3); V(max) = 17.73 cm(3)) were planned with both Varian RA and MME at 2 different institutions with extensive experience in each respective technique. All plans had a single isocenter and used Varian linac equipped with high-definition multileaf collimator. RA plans used 2 to 4 noncoplanar VMAT arcs with 10 MV flattening filter-free beam. MME plans used 4 to 9 noncoplanar DCAs and 6 MV flattening filter-free beam, (minimum planning target volume [PTV(min]) = 0.49 cm(3); PTV(max) = 27.32 cm(3); PTV(median) = 7.05 cm(3)). Prescriptions were 14 to 24 Gy in a single fraction. Target coverage goal was 99% of volume receiving prescription dose (D99% ≥ 100%). Plans were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Paddick conformity index (CI) score, 12 Gy volume (V(12Gy)), V(8Gy), V(5Gy), mean brain dose (D(mean)), and beam-on time. RESULTS: Conformity was favorable among RA plans (median: MME CI(RTOG) = 1.38; RA CI(RTOG) = 1.21; P < .0001). V(12Gy) and V(8Gy) were lower for RA plans (median: MME V12 = 23.7 cm(3); RA V12 = 19.2 cm(3); P = .0001; median: MME V(8Gy) = 53.6 cm(3); RA V(8Gy) = 44.1 cm(3); P = .024). V(5Gy) was lower for MME plans (median: MME V(5Gy) = 141.4 cm(3); RA V(5Gy) = 142.8 cm(3); P = .009). Mean brain was lower for MME plans (median: MME D(mean) = 2.57 Gy; RA D(mean) = 2.76 Gy; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For linac-based multiple metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery, RapidArc VMAT facilitates favorable conformity and V(12Gy)/V(8Gy) volume compared with the MME DCA plan. MME planning facilitates reduced dose spill at levels ≤V(5Gy). Elsevier 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7560574/ /pubmed/33089021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.10.007 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Liu, Haisong Thomas, Evan M. Li, Jun Yu, Yan Andrews, David Markert, James M. Fiveash, John B. Shi, Wenyin Popple, Richard A. Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques |
title | Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques |
title_full | Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques |
title_fullStr | Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques |
title_short | Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques |
title_sort | interinstitutional plan quality assessment of 2 linac-based, single-isocenter, multiple metastasis radiosurgery techniques |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.10.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhaisong interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT thomasevanm interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT lijun interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT yuyan interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT andrewsdavid interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT markertjamesm interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT fiveashjohnb interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT shiwenyin interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques AT popplericharda interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques |