Cargando…

Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques

PURPOSE: Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Haisong, Thomas, Evan M., Li, Jun, Yu, Yan, Andrews, David, Markert, James M., Fiveash, John B., Shi, Wenyin, Popple, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.10.007
_version_ 1783595114802708480
author Liu, Haisong
Thomas, Evan M.
Li, Jun
Yu, Yan
Andrews, David
Markert, James M.
Fiveash, John B.
Shi, Wenyin
Popple, Richard A.
author_facet Liu, Haisong
Thomas, Evan M.
Li, Jun
Yu, Yan
Andrews, David
Markert, James M.
Fiveash, John B.
Shi, Wenyin
Popple, Richard A.
author_sort Liu, Haisong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME), a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach, and Varian RapidArc (RA), a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach. In this work, we systematically compared plan quality between the 2 techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients with 4 to 10 metastases (217 total; median 7.5; V(min) = 0.014 cm(3); V(max) = 17.73 cm(3)) were planned with both Varian RA and MME at 2 different institutions with extensive experience in each respective technique. All plans had a single isocenter and used Varian linac equipped with high-definition multileaf collimator. RA plans used 2 to 4 noncoplanar VMAT arcs with 10 MV flattening filter-free beam. MME plans used 4 to 9 noncoplanar DCAs and 6 MV flattening filter-free beam, (minimum planning target volume [PTV(min]) = 0.49 cm(3); PTV(max) = 27.32 cm(3); PTV(median) = 7.05 cm(3)). Prescriptions were 14 to 24 Gy in a single fraction. Target coverage goal was 99% of volume receiving prescription dose (D99% ≥ 100%). Plans were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Paddick conformity index (CI) score, 12 Gy volume (V(12Gy)), V(8Gy), V(5Gy), mean brain dose (D(mean)), and beam-on time. RESULTS: Conformity was favorable among RA plans (median: MME CI(RTOG) = 1.38; RA CI(RTOG) = 1.21; P < .0001). V(12Gy) and V(8Gy) were lower for RA plans (median: MME V12 = 23.7 cm(3); RA V12 = 19.2 cm(3); P = .0001; median: MME V(8Gy) = 53.6 cm(3); RA V(8Gy) = 44.1 cm(3); P = .024). V(5Gy) was lower for MME plans (median: MME V(5Gy) = 141.4 cm(3); RA V(5Gy) = 142.8 cm(3); P = .009). Mean brain was lower for MME plans (median: MME D(mean) = 2.57 Gy; RA D(mean) = 2.76 Gy; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For linac-based multiple metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery, RapidArc VMAT facilitates favorable conformity and V(12Gy)/V(8Gy) volume compared with the MME DCA plan. MME planning facilitates reduced dose spill at levels ≤V(5Gy).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7560574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75605742020-10-20 Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques Liu, Haisong Thomas, Evan M. Li, Jun Yu, Yan Andrews, David Markert, James M. Fiveash, John B. Shi, Wenyin Popple, Richard A. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME), a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach, and Varian RapidArc (RA), a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach. In this work, we systematically compared plan quality between the 2 techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty patients with 4 to 10 metastases (217 total; median 7.5; V(min) = 0.014 cm(3); V(max) = 17.73 cm(3)) were planned with both Varian RA and MME at 2 different institutions with extensive experience in each respective technique. All plans had a single isocenter and used Varian linac equipped with high-definition multileaf collimator. RA plans used 2 to 4 noncoplanar VMAT arcs with 10 MV flattening filter-free beam. MME plans used 4 to 9 noncoplanar DCAs and 6 MV flattening filter-free beam, (minimum planning target volume [PTV(min]) = 0.49 cm(3); PTV(max) = 27.32 cm(3); PTV(median) = 7.05 cm(3)). Prescriptions were 14 to 24 Gy in a single fraction. Target coverage goal was 99% of volume receiving prescription dose (D99% ≥ 100%). Plans were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Paddick conformity index (CI) score, 12 Gy volume (V(12Gy)), V(8Gy), V(5Gy), mean brain dose (D(mean)), and beam-on time. RESULTS: Conformity was favorable among RA plans (median: MME CI(RTOG) = 1.38; RA CI(RTOG) = 1.21; P < .0001). V(12Gy) and V(8Gy) were lower for RA plans (median: MME V12 = 23.7 cm(3); RA V12 = 19.2 cm(3); P = .0001; median: MME V(8Gy) = 53.6 cm(3); RA V(8Gy) = 44.1 cm(3); P = .024). V(5Gy) was lower for MME plans (median: MME V(5Gy) = 141.4 cm(3); RA V(5Gy) = 142.8 cm(3); P = .009). Mean brain was lower for MME plans (median: MME D(mean) = 2.57 Gy; RA D(mean) = 2.76 Gy; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: For linac-based multiple metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery, RapidArc VMAT facilitates favorable conformity and V(12Gy)/V(8Gy) volume compared with the MME DCA plan. MME planning facilitates reduced dose spill at levels ≤V(5Gy). Elsevier 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7560574/ /pubmed/33089021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.10.007 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Liu, Haisong
Thomas, Evan M.
Li, Jun
Yu, Yan
Andrews, David
Markert, James M.
Fiveash, John B.
Shi, Wenyin
Popple, Richard A.
Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques
title Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques
title_full Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques
title_fullStr Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques
title_short Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques
title_sort interinstitutional plan quality assessment of 2 linac-based, single-isocenter, multiple metastasis radiosurgery techniques
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2019.10.007
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhaisong interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT thomasevanm interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT lijun interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT yuyan interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT andrewsdavid interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT markertjamesm interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT fiveashjohnb interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT shiwenyin interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques
AT popplericharda interinstitutionalplanqualityassessmentof2linacbasedsingleisocentermultiplemetastasisradiosurgerytechniques