Cargando…

Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation

BACKGROUND: The interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madrid, Antonio, Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena, Robles-García, Verónica, Chouza-Insua, Marcelo, Cudeiro, Javier, Arias, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05179
_version_ 1783595115265130496
author Madrid, Antonio
Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena
Robles-García, Verónica
Chouza-Insua, Marcelo
Cudeiro, Javier
Arias, Pablo
author_facet Madrid, Antonio
Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena
Robles-García, Verónica
Chouza-Insua, Marcelo
Cudeiro, Javier
Arias, Pablo
author_sort Madrid, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usually delivered from 5 to 10 s after the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the potentiated muscle. METHODS: In this work, we evaluated the sizes of the evoked twitches in the lower limb with different controlled stimulation time delays with respect to the MVC of the ankle plantar flexors. Fifteen healthy participants were included. We recorded the un-potentiated muscle twitch amplitudes at rest in response to doublet supramaximal stimulation of the tibial nerve, superimposed twitches (SITs) at three different delays from the beginning of the MVC force plateau (0.1, 0.75, and 1.5 s), and resting twitches in the potentiated muscle at four different delays once the MVC was finished (0.1, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 s). RESULTS: The magnitude of the SITs did not vary among the delays tested but varied among the potentiated resting twitch (PRT) amplitudes, with 2.5 s being largest and 0.1 s being the smallest. Remarkably, the resting twitch amplitudes reduced during the session despite the long rest periods between MVCs (5 min). CONCLUSION: We conclude that proper control of the stimulation timing is mandatory to increase the sensitivity of the ITT, and a 2.5 s delay from the end of the MVC is recommended for the PRT. Controlling the development of fatigue, which can be intrinsic to testing with repeated MVCs, is also essential. We recommend reducing the number of MVC repetitions and increasing the rest periods between them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7560577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75605772020-10-20 Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation Madrid, Antonio Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena Robles-García, Verónica Chouza-Insua, Marcelo Cudeiro, Javier Arias, Pablo Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: The interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usually delivered from 5 to 10 s after the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the potentiated muscle. METHODS: In this work, we evaluated the sizes of the evoked twitches in the lower limb with different controlled stimulation time delays with respect to the MVC of the ankle plantar flexors. Fifteen healthy participants were included. We recorded the un-potentiated muscle twitch amplitudes at rest in response to doublet supramaximal stimulation of the tibial nerve, superimposed twitches (SITs) at three different delays from the beginning of the MVC force plateau (0.1, 0.75, and 1.5 s), and resting twitches in the potentiated muscle at four different delays once the MVC was finished (0.1, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 s). RESULTS: The magnitude of the SITs did not vary among the delays tested but varied among the potentiated resting twitch (PRT) amplitudes, with 2.5 s being largest and 0.1 s being the smallest. Remarkably, the resting twitch amplitudes reduced during the session despite the long rest periods between MVCs (5 min). CONCLUSION: We conclude that proper control of the stimulation timing is mandatory to increase the sensitivity of the ITT, and a 2.5 s delay from the end of the MVC is recommended for the PRT. Controlling the development of fatigue, which can be intrinsic to testing with repeated MVCs, is also essential. We recommend reducing the number of MVC repetitions and increasing the rest periods between them. Elsevier 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7560577/ /pubmed/33088951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05179 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Madrid, Antonio
Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena
Robles-García, Verónica
Chouza-Insua, Marcelo
Cudeiro, Javier
Arias, Pablo
Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
title Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
title_full Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
title_fullStr Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
title_short Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
title_sort effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05179
work_keys_str_mv AT madridantonio effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration
AT madinabeitiamanceboelena effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration
AT roblesgarciaveronica effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration
AT chouzainsuamarcelo effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration
AT cudeirojavier effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration
AT ariaspablo effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration