Cargando…
Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation
BACKGROUND: The interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05179 |
_version_ | 1783595115265130496 |
---|---|
author | Madrid, Antonio Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena Robles-García, Verónica Chouza-Insua, Marcelo Cudeiro, Javier Arias, Pablo |
author_facet | Madrid, Antonio Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena Robles-García, Verónica Chouza-Insua, Marcelo Cudeiro, Javier Arias, Pablo |
author_sort | Madrid, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usually delivered from 5 to 10 s after the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the potentiated muscle. METHODS: In this work, we evaluated the sizes of the evoked twitches in the lower limb with different controlled stimulation time delays with respect to the MVC of the ankle plantar flexors. Fifteen healthy participants were included. We recorded the un-potentiated muscle twitch amplitudes at rest in response to doublet supramaximal stimulation of the tibial nerve, superimposed twitches (SITs) at three different delays from the beginning of the MVC force plateau (0.1, 0.75, and 1.5 s), and resting twitches in the potentiated muscle at four different delays once the MVC was finished (0.1, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 s). RESULTS: The magnitude of the SITs did not vary among the delays tested but varied among the potentiated resting twitch (PRT) amplitudes, with 2.5 s being largest and 0.1 s being the smallest. Remarkably, the resting twitch amplitudes reduced during the session despite the long rest periods between MVCs (5 min). CONCLUSION: We conclude that proper control of the stimulation timing is mandatory to increase the sensitivity of the ITT, and a 2.5 s delay from the end of the MVC is recommended for the PRT. Controlling the development of fatigue, which can be intrinsic to testing with repeated MVCs, is also essential. We recommend reducing the number of MVC repetitions and increasing the rest periods between them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7560577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75605772020-10-20 Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation Madrid, Antonio Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena Robles-García, Verónica Chouza-Insua, Marcelo Cudeiro, Javier Arias, Pablo Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: The interpolated twitch technique (ITT) is a ubiquitous test for assessing the level of voluntary muscle force generation, in which muscle twitches are evoked via percutaneous electrical stimulation. Traditionally, the stimulation timing during the ITT is not computer-controlled and usually delivered from 5 to 10 s after the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the potentiated muscle. METHODS: In this work, we evaluated the sizes of the evoked twitches in the lower limb with different controlled stimulation time delays with respect to the MVC of the ankle plantar flexors. Fifteen healthy participants were included. We recorded the un-potentiated muscle twitch amplitudes at rest in response to doublet supramaximal stimulation of the tibial nerve, superimposed twitches (SITs) at three different delays from the beginning of the MVC force plateau (0.1, 0.75, and 1.5 s), and resting twitches in the potentiated muscle at four different delays once the MVC was finished (0.1, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 s). RESULTS: The magnitude of the SITs did not vary among the delays tested but varied among the potentiated resting twitch (PRT) amplitudes, with 2.5 s being largest and 0.1 s being the smallest. Remarkably, the resting twitch amplitudes reduced during the session despite the long rest periods between MVCs (5 min). CONCLUSION: We conclude that proper control of the stimulation timing is mandatory to increase the sensitivity of the ITT, and a 2.5 s delay from the end of the MVC is recommended for the PRT. Controlling the development of fatigue, which can be intrinsic to testing with repeated MVCs, is also essential. We recommend reducing the number of MVC repetitions and increasing the rest periods between them. Elsevier 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7560577/ /pubmed/33088951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05179 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Madrid, Antonio Madinabeitia-Mancebo, Elena Robles-García, Verónica Chouza-Insua, Marcelo Cudeiro, Javier Arias, Pablo Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation |
title | Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation |
title_full | Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation |
title_fullStr | Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation |
title_short | Effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation |
title_sort | effect of stimulation timing on testing voluntary muscle force generation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7560577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33088951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madridantonio effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration AT madinabeitiamanceboelena effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration AT roblesgarciaveronica effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration AT chouzainsuamarcelo effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration AT cudeirojavier effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration AT ariaspablo effectofstimulationtimingontestingvoluntarymuscleforcegeneration |