Cargando…
Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears
In bimodal listening, cochlear implant (CI) users combine electric hearing (EH) in one ear and acoustic hearing (AH) in the other ear. In electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS), CI users combine EH and AH in the same ear. In quiet, integration of EH and AH has been shown to be better with EAS, but with...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240752 |
_version_ | 1783595201791524864 |
---|---|
author | Willis, Shelby Moore, Brian C. J. Galvin, John J. Fu, Qian-Jie |
author_facet | Willis, Shelby Moore, Brian C. J. Galvin, John J. Fu, Qian-Jie |
author_sort | Willis, Shelby |
collection | PubMed |
description | In bimodal listening, cochlear implant (CI) users combine electric hearing (EH) in one ear and acoustic hearing (AH) in the other ear. In electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS), CI users combine EH and AH in the same ear. In quiet, integration of EH and AH has been shown to be better with EAS, but with greater sensitivity to tonotopic mismatch in EH. The goal of the present study was to evaluate how external noise might affect integration of AH and EH within or across ears. Recognition of monosyllabic words was measured for normal-hearing subjects listening to simulations of unimodal (AH or EH alone), EAS, and bimodal listening in quiet and in speech-shaped steady noise (10 dB, 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio). The input/output frequency range for AH was 0.1–0.6 kHz. EH was simulated using an 8-channel noise vocoder. The output frequency range was 1.2–8.0 kHz to simulate a shallow insertion depth. The input frequency range was either matched (1.2–8.0 kHz) or mismatched (0.6–8.0 kHz) to the output frequency range; the mismatched input range maximized the amount of speech information, while the matched input resulted in some speech information loss. In quiet, tonotopic mismatch differently affected EAS and bimodal performance. In noise, EAS and bimodal performance was similarly affected by tonotopic mismatch. The data suggest that tonotopic mismatch may differently affect integration of EH and AH in quiet and in noise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7561114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75611142020-10-21 Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears Willis, Shelby Moore, Brian C. J. Galvin, John J. Fu, Qian-Jie PLoS One Research Article In bimodal listening, cochlear implant (CI) users combine electric hearing (EH) in one ear and acoustic hearing (AH) in the other ear. In electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS), CI users combine EH and AH in the same ear. In quiet, integration of EH and AH has been shown to be better with EAS, but with greater sensitivity to tonotopic mismatch in EH. The goal of the present study was to evaluate how external noise might affect integration of AH and EH within or across ears. Recognition of monosyllabic words was measured for normal-hearing subjects listening to simulations of unimodal (AH or EH alone), EAS, and bimodal listening in quiet and in speech-shaped steady noise (10 dB, 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio). The input/output frequency range for AH was 0.1–0.6 kHz. EH was simulated using an 8-channel noise vocoder. The output frequency range was 1.2–8.0 kHz to simulate a shallow insertion depth. The input frequency range was either matched (1.2–8.0 kHz) or mismatched (0.6–8.0 kHz) to the output frequency range; the mismatched input range maximized the amount of speech information, while the matched input resulted in some speech information loss. In quiet, tonotopic mismatch differently affected EAS and bimodal performance. In noise, EAS and bimodal performance was similarly affected by tonotopic mismatch. The data suggest that tonotopic mismatch may differently affect integration of EH and AH in quiet and in noise. Public Library of Science 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7561114/ /pubmed/33057396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240752 Text en © 2020 Willis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Willis, Shelby Moore, Brian C. J. Galvin, John J. Fu, Qian-Jie Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears |
title | Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears |
title_full | Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears |
title_fullStr | Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears |
title_short | Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears |
title_sort | effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33057396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willisshelby effectsofnoiseonintegrationofacousticandelectrichearingwithinandacrossears AT moorebriancj effectsofnoiseonintegrationofacousticandelectrichearingwithinandacrossears AT galvinjohnj effectsofnoiseonintegrationofacousticandelectrichearingwithinandacrossears AT fuqianjie effectsofnoiseonintegrationofacousticandelectrichearingwithinandacrossears |