Cargando…
Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need?
The CoViD-19 pandemic has caused a sudden spike in demand and production of hand sanitisers. Concerns are rising regarding the quality of such products, as the safeguard of consumers is a priority worldwide. We analyse here the ethanolic content of seven off-the-shelf hand sanitiser gels (two biocid...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01818-6 |
_version_ | 1783595237638144000 |
---|---|
author | Berardi, Alberto Cenci-Goga, Beniamino Grispoldi, Luca Cossignani, Lina Perinelli, Diego Romano |
author_facet | Berardi, Alberto Cenci-Goga, Beniamino Grispoldi, Luca Cossignani, Lina Perinelli, Diego Romano |
author_sort | Berardi, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | The CoViD-19 pandemic has caused a sudden spike in demand and production of hand sanitisers. Concerns are rising regarding the quality of such products, as the safeguard of consumers is a priority worldwide. We analyse here the ethanolic content of seven off-the-shelf hand sanitiser gels (two biocides and five cosmetics) from the Italian market, using gas chromatography. The WHO recommends that products containing ethanol should have 60–95% (v/v) alcohol. Four of the tested hand gels have ethanolic contents within the recommended range, while three products (all cosmetics) contain < 60% (v/v), i.e. 52.1% (w/w), ethanol. The product with the lowest alcoholic content has 37.1% w/w ethanol. Toxic methanol is not found in any of the hand sanitisers. We show, in addition, that products with the highest ethanolic content have generally greater antibacterial activity. In conclusion, all tested products are complying with the EU regulations, as the three “substandard” products are classified as cosmetics, whose purpose is cleaning and not disinfecting. Nevertheless, if such hand cleaners were inappropriately used as hand disinfectants, they might be ineffective. Thus, consumer safety relays on awareness and ability to distinguish between biocidal and cosmetics hand gels. The obtained results might sensitise the scientific community, health agencies and ultimately consumers towards the risks of using hand sanitisers of substandard alcoholic concentration. If the wrong product is chosen by consumers, public health can be compromised by the inappropriate use of “low-dosed” cosmetic gels as disinfectants, particularly during the period of the CoViD-19 pandemic. [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1208/s12249-020-01818-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7561283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-75612832020-10-16 Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need? Berardi, Alberto Cenci-Goga, Beniamino Grispoldi, Luca Cossignani, Lina Perinelli, Diego Romano AAPS PharmSciTech Rapid Communication The CoViD-19 pandemic has caused a sudden spike in demand and production of hand sanitisers. Concerns are rising regarding the quality of such products, as the safeguard of consumers is a priority worldwide. We analyse here the ethanolic content of seven off-the-shelf hand sanitiser gels (two biocides and five cosmetics) from the Italian market, using gas chromatography. The WHO recommends that products containing ethanol should have 60–95% (v/v) alcohol. Four of the tested hand gels have ethanolic contents within the recommended range, while three products (all cosmetics) contain < 60% (v/v), i.e. 52.1% (w/w), ethanol. The product with the lowest alcoholic content has 37.1% w/w ethanol. Toxic methanol is not found in any of the hand sanitisers. We show, in addition, that products with the highest ethanolic content have generally greater antibacterial activity. In conclusion, all tested products are complying with the EU regulations, as the three “substandard” products are classified as cosmetics, whose purpose is cleaning and not disinfecting. Nevertheless, if such hand cleaners were inappropriately used as hand disinfectants, they might be ineffective. Thus, consumer safety relays on awareness and ability to distinguish between biocidal and cosmetics hand gels. The obtained results might sensitise the scientific community, health agencies and ultimately consumers towards the risks of using hand sanitisers of substandard alcoholic concentration. If the wrong product is chosen by consumers, public health can be compromised by the inappropriate use of “low-dosed” cosmetic gels as disinfectants, particularly during the period of the CoViD-19 pandemic. [Image: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1208/s12249-020-01818-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7561283/ /pubmed/33063151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01818-6 Text en © American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Rapid Communication Berardi, Alberto Cenci-Goga, Beniamino Grispoldi, Luca Cossignani, Lina Perinelli, Diego Romano Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need? |
title | Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need? |
title_full | Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need? |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need? |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need? |
title_short | Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need? |
title_sort | analysis of commercial hand sanitisers amid covid-19: are we getting the products that we need? |
topic | Rapid Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01818-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berardialberto analysisofcommercialhandsanitisersamidcovid19arewegettingtheproductsthatweneed AT cencigogabeniamino analysisofcommercialhandsanitisersamidcovid19arewegettingtheproductsthatweneed AT grispoldiluca analysisofcommercialhandsanitisersamidcovid19arewegettingtheproductsthatweneed AT cossignanilina analysisofcommercialhandsanitisersamidcovid19arewegettingtheproductsthatweneed AT perinellidiegoromano analysisofcommercialhandsanitisersamidcovid19arewegettingtheproductsthatweneed |