Cargando…

Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: The average length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU_ALOS) is a helpful parameter summarizing critical bed occupancy. During the outbreak of a novel virus, estimating early a reliable ICU_ALOS estimate of infected patients is critical to accurately parameterize models examini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lapidus, Nathanael, Zhou, Xianlong, Carrat, Fabrice, Riou, Bruno, Zhao, Yan, Hejblum, Gilles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00749-6
_version_ 1783595271442137088
author Lapidus, Nathanael
Zhou, Xianlong
Carrat, Fabrice
Riou, Bruno
Zhao, Yan
Hejblum, Gilles
author_facet Lapidus, Nathanael
Zhou, Xianlong
Carrat, Fabrice
Riou, Bruno
Zhao, Yan
Hejblum, Gilles
author_sort Lapidus, Nathanael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The average length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU_ALOS) is a helpful parameter summarizing critical bed occupancy. During the outbreak of a novel virus, estimating early a reliable ICU_ALOS estimate of infected patients is critical to accurately parameterize models examining mitigation and preparedness scenarios. METHODS: Two estimation methods of ICU_ALOS were compared: the average LOS of already discharged patients at the date of estimation (DPE), and a standard parametric method used for analyzing time-to-event data which fits a given distribution to observed data and includes the censored stays of patients still treated in the ICU at the date of estimation (CPE). Methods were compared on a series of all COVID-19 consecutive cases (n = 59) admitted in an ICU devoted to such patients. At the last follow-up date, 99 days after the first admission, all patients but one had been discharged. A simulation study investigated the generalizability of the methods' patterns. CPE and DPE estimates were also compared to COVID-19 estimates reported to date. RESULTS: LOS ≥ 30 days concerned 14 out of the 59 patients (24%), including 8 of the 21 deaths observed. Two months after the first admission, 38 (64%) patients had been discharged, with corresponding DPE and CPE estimates of ICU_ALOS (95% CI) at 13.0 days (10.4–15.6) and 23.1 days (18.1–29.7), respectively. Series' true ICU_ALOS was greater than 21 days, well above reported estimates to date. CONCLUSIONS: Discharges of short stays are more likely observed earlier during the course of an outbreak. Cautious unbiased ICU_ALOS estimates suggest parameterizing a higher burden of ICU bed occupancy than that adopted to date in COVID-19 forecasting models. FUNDING: Support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900097 to Dr. Zhou) and the Emergency Response Project of Hubei Science and Technology Department (2020FCA023 to Pr. Zhao).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7561433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-75614332020-10-16 Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic Lapidus, Nathanael Zhou, Xianlong Carrat, Fabrice Riou, Bruno Zhao, Yan Hejblum, Gilles Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The average length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU_ALOS) is a helpful parameter summarizing critical bed occupancy. During the outbreak of a novel virus, estimating early a reliable ICU_ALOS estimate of infected patients is critical to accurately parameterize models examining mitigation and preparedness scenarios. METHODS: Two estimation methods of ICU_ALOS were compared: the average LOS of already discharged patients at the date of estimation (DPE), and a standard parametric method used for analyzing time-to-event data which fits a given distribution to observed data and includes the censored stays of patients still treated in the ICU at the date of estimation (CPE). Methods were compared on a series of all COVID-19 consecutive cases (n = 59) admitted in an ICU devoted to such patients. At the last follow-up date, 99 days after the first admission, all patients but one had been discharged. A simulation study investigated the generalizability of the methods' patterns. CPE and DPE estimates were also compared to COVID-19 estimates reported to date. RESULTS: LOS ≥ 30 days concerned 14 out of the 59 patients (24%), including 8 of the 21 deaths observed. Two months after the first admission, 38 (64%) patients had been discharged, with corresponding DPE and CPE estimates of ICU_ALOS (95% CI) at 13.0 days (10.4–15.6) and 23.1 days (18.1–29.7), respectively. Series' true ICU_ALOS was greater than 21 days, well above reported estimates to date. CONCLUSIONS: Discharges of short stays are more likely observed earlier during the course of an outbreak. Cautious unbiased ICU_ALOS estimates suggest parameterizing a higher burden of ICU bed occupancy than that adopted to date in COVID-19 forecasting models. FUNDING: Support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900097 to Dr. Zhou) and the Emergency Response Project of Hubei Science and Technology Department (2020FCA023 to Pr. Zhao). Springer International Publishing 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7561433/ /pubmed/33063241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00749-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Lapidus, Nathanael
Zhou, Xianlong
Carrat, Fabrice
Riou, Bruno
Zhao, Yan
Hejblum, Gilles
Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic
title Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_short Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic
title_sort biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the covid-19 pandemic
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7561433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33063241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00749-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lapidusnathanael biasedandunbiasedestimationoftheaveragelengthofstayinintensivecareunitsinthecovid19pandemic
AT zhouxianlong biasedandunbiasedestimationoftheaveragelengthofstayinintensivecareunitsinthecovid19pandemic
AT carratfabrice biasedandunbiasedestimationoftheaveragelengthofstayinintensivecareunitsinthecovid19pandemic
AT rioubruno biasedandunbiasedestimationoftheaveragelengthofstayinintensivecareunitsinthecovid19pandemic
AT zhaoyan biasedandunbiasedestimationoftheaveragelengthofstayinintensivecareunitsinthecovid19pandemic
AT hejblumgilles biasedandunbiasedestimationoftheaveragelengthofstayinintensivecareunitsinthecovid19pandemic